Social and configural effects on the cognitive dynamics of perspective-taking

Alexia Galati, Rick Dale, Nicholas Duran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

How do environmental cues and social perspectives influence perspective selection? Listeners responded to instructions (e.g., “Give me the folder on the right”) from a simulated partner, selecting from two objects consistently aligned with themselves (ego-aligned; Experiment 1a) or the speaker (other-aligned; Experiment1b). In Experiment 2, listeners selected from triangular 3-object configurations whose orientation varied (ego-, other-, or neither-aligned). When the configural cue was other-aligned (consistently or inconsistently: Experiments 1b and 2), listeners were more likely to be other-centric. Other-centric responders stabilized their strategy more quickly when the cue was other-aligned, but their mouse trajectories did not exhibit facilitation (Experiment 1b vs. 1a). In Experiment 2, other-centric responders showed sensitivity to the configural cue, making longer and more complex trajectories on neither-aligned configurations. That cue also influenced how listeners interpreted the front-back terms. Our findings suggest that configural cues can promote an other-centric strategy and its stabilization, influence response dynamics selectively, and impact the interpretation of spatial language.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume104
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Keywords

  • Audience design
  • Cognitive dynamics
  • Mouse-tracking
  • Perspective-taking
  • Spatial cognition
  • Spatial instructions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Social and configural effects on the cognitive dynamics of perspective-taking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this