Shades of blue: Local policing, legality, and immigration law

Doris Marie Provine, Paul Lewis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Local law enforcement has often been described as the “thin blue line” that protects the American public from criminality, a perspective that emphasizes the responsibility of police officers to balance the demands of public safety and individual rights. Local law enforcement can also be described as government at its most decentralized level, a perspective with significant implications for the study of immigration enforcement. Police and sheriffs enforce locally enacted laws at a local level and answer to local authorities. Localism in law enforcement is part of the constitutional design. From the perspective of the federal government, however, the traditional independence of local law enforcement from federal authority can impede the realization of important policy goals, such as the enforcement of federal immigration laws. In this view, local law enforcement has the potential to be a valuable “force multiplier” in the effort to detect and remove unauthorized immigrants from the nation’s interior. Under the umbrella of cooperative federalism, what was once an informal and sporadic relationship between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities is morphing into something much more intense and organized. The process began in 1996 when the federal agency charged with immigration enforcement, now called Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), began to actively seek partnerships with local police departments and sheriffs (see Menjívar and Kanstroom, Chapter 1, regarding the expansion of deportations during this period). The idea was to increase the apprehension of undocumented immigrants by authorizing local police to make arrests and verify immigration status. This experiment in the devolution of enforcement authority, at first limited to a few interested jurisdictions, has now evolved into a national mandatory effort: Operation Secure Communities. The goal of this new program is to link local jails to federal immigration databases and require cooperation from jail officials in reporting and holding arrestees who appear to lack legal status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationConstructing Immigrant 'Illegality': Critiques, Experiences, and Responses
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages298-324
Number of pages27
ISBN (Print)9781107300408, 9781107041592
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

immigration law
legality
local law
law enforcement
immigration
police
immigrant
federal authority
deportation
federal law
Criminality
legal status
multiplier
police officer
federalism
Federal Government
decentralization
jurisdiction
responsibility
Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Provine, D. M., & Lewis, P. (2010). Shades of blue: Local policing, legality, and immigration law. In Constructing Immigrant 'Illegality': Critiques, Experiences, and Responses (pp. 298-324). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107300408.016

Shades of blue : Local policing, legality, and immigration law. / Provine, Doris Marie; Lewis, Paul.

Constructing Immigrant 'Illegality': Critiques, Experiences, and Responses. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 298-324.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Provine, DM & Lewis, P 2010, Shades of blue: Local policing, legality, and immigration law. in Constructing Immigrant 'Illegality': Critiques, Experiences, and Responses. Cambridge University Press, pp. 298-324. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107300408.016
Provine DM, Lewis P. Shades of blue: Local policing, legality, and immigration law. In Constructing Immigrant 'Illegality': Critiques, Experiences, and Responses. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 298-324 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107300408.016
Provine, Doris Marie ; Lewis, Paul. / Shades of blue : Local policing, legality, and immigration law. Constructing Immigrant 'Illegality': Critiques, Experiences, and Responses. Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 298-324
@inbook{cf5ebd48bbb444348eb0940c7fe222a6,
title = "Shades of blue: Local policing, legality, and immigration law",
abstract = "Local law enforcement has often been described as the “thin blue line” that protects the American public from criminality, a perspective that emphasizes the responsibility of police officers to balance the demands of public safety and individual rights. Local law enforcement can also be described as government at its most decentralized level, a perspective with significant implications for the study of immigration enforcement. Police and sheriffs enforce locally enacted laws at a local level and answer to local authorities. Localism in law enforcement is part of the constitutional design. From the perspective of the federal government, however, the traditional independence of local law enforcement from federal authority can impede the realization of important policy goals, such as the enforcement of federal immigration laws. In this view, local law enforcement has the potential to be a valuable “force multiplier” in the effort to detect and remove unauthorized immigrants from the nation’s interior. Under the umbrella of cooperative federalism, what was once an informal and sporadic relationship between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities is morphing into something much more intense and organized. The process began in 1996 when the federal agency charged with immigration enforcement, now called Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), began to actively seek partnerships with local police departments and sheriffs (see Menj{\'i}var and Kanstroom, Chapter 1, regarding the expansion of deportations during this period). The idea was to increase the apprehension of undocumented immigrants by authorizing local police to make arrests and verify immigration status. This experiment in the devolution of enforcement authority, at first limited to a few interested jurisdictions, has now evolved into a national mandatory effort: Operation Secure Communities. The goal of this new program is to link local jails to federal immigration databases and require cooperation from jail officials in reporting and holding arrestees who appear to lack legal status.",
author = "Provine, {Doris Marie} and Paul Lewis",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107300408.016",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107300408",
pages = "298--324",
booktitle = "Constructing Immigrant 'Illegality': Critiques, Experiences, and Responses",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Shades of blue

T2 - Local policing, legality, and immigration law

AU - Provine, Doris Marie

AU - Lewis, Paul

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Local law enforcement has often been described as the “thin blue line” that protects the American public from criminality, a perspective that emphasizes the responsibility of police officers to balance the demands of public safety and individual rights. Local law enforcement can also be described as government at its most decentralized level, a perspective with significant implications for the study of immigration enforcement. Police and sheriffs enforce locally enacted laws at a local level and answer to local authorities. Localism in law enforcement is part of the constitutional design. From the perspective of the federal government, however, the traditional independence of local law enforcement from federal authority can impede the realization of important policy goals, such as the enforcement of federal immigration laws. In this view, local law enforcement has the potential to be a valuable “force multiplier” in the effort to detect and remove unauthorized immigrants from the nation’s interior. Under the umbrella of cooperative federalism, what was once an informal and sporadic relationship between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities is morphing into something much more intense and organized. The process began in 1996 when the federal agency charged with immigration enforcement, now called Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), began to actively seek partnerships with local police departments and sheriffs (see Menjívar and Kanstroom, Chapter 1, regarding the expansion of deportations during this period). The idea was to increase the apprehension of undocumented immigrants by authorizing local police to make arrests and verify immigration status. This experiment in the devolution of enforcement authority, at first limited to a few interested jurisdictions, has now evolved into a national mandatory effort: Operation Secure Communities. The goal of this new program is to link local jails to federal immigration databases and require cooperation from jail officials in reporting and holding arrestees who appear to lack legal status.

AB - Local law enforcement has often been described as the “thin blue line” that protects the American public from criminality, a perspective that emphasizes the responsibility of police officers to balance the demands of public safety and individual rights. Local law enforcement can also be described as government at its most decentralized level, a perspective with significant implications for the study of immigration enforcement. Police and sheriffs enforce locally enacted laws at a local level and answer to local authorities. Localism in law enforcement is part of the constitutional design. From the perspective of the federal government, however, the traditional independence of local law enforcement from federal authority can impede the realization of important policy goals, such as the enforcement of federal immigration laws. In this view, local law enforcement has the potential to be a valuable “force multiplier” in the effort to detect and remove unauthorized immigrants from the nation’s interior. Under the umbrella of cooperative federalism, what was once an informal and sporadic relationship between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities is morphing into something much more intense and organized. The process began in 1996 when the federal agency charged with immigration enforcement, now called Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), began to actively seek partnerships with local police departments and sheriffs (see Menjívar and Kanstroom, Chapter 1, regarding the expansion of deportations during this period). The idea was to increase the apprehension of undocumented immigrants by authorizing local police to make arrests and verify immigration status. This experiment in the devolution of enforcement authority, at first limited to a few interested jurisdictions, has now evolved into a national mandatory effort: Operation Secure Communities. The goal of this new program is to link local jails to federal immigration databases and require cooperation from jail officials in reporting and holding arrestees who appear to lack legal status.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923521392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923521392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107300408.016

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107300408.016

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923521392

SN - 9781107300408

SN - 9781107041592

SP - 298

EP - 324

BT - Constructing Immigrant 'Illegality': Critiques, Experiences, and Responses

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -