Setting agendas and designing alternatives: Policymaking and the strategic role of meetings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of strategic forums - such as special commissions, task,forces, roundtables, working groups, summits - in the policy process. Reviewing prominent theories about policymaking, the author suggests ways in which strategic forums might fit within these frameworks as an analytically distinct policy lever. The paper examines existing literature on such forums, and identifies characteristics of "meetings that matter" - those gatherings that appear to have achieved some policy traction in a given domain. Finally, the paper investigates a particular field, cultural policy, to evaluate the extent to which meetings are serving policy purposes. The author concludes that meetings can serve an important role in the policy process by framing public problems and highlighting policy alternatives; creating and sustaining policy communities; fostering policy transfer and knowledge uptake; and developing networks among policy entrepreneurs. Nonetheless, with regard to cultural policy, the author argues that, compared to other policy domains, strategic policy-focused convenings are not a regular part of the arts and culture landscape and remain underused policy tools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-542
Number of pages20
JournalReview of Policy Research
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

cultural policy
working group
entrepreneur
art
community
policy
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Setting agendas and designing alternatives : Policymaking and the strategic role of meetings. / Tepper, Steven.

In: Review of Policy Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 07.2004, p. 523-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c5286e3cbdd54c97affa3b2c063166f1,
title = "Setting agendas and designing alternatives: Policymaking and the strategic role of meetings",
abstract = "This paper investigates the role of strategic forums - such as special commissions, task,forces, roundtables, working groups, summits - in the policy process. Reviewing prominent theories about policymaking, the author suggests ways in which strategic forums might fit within these frameworks as an analytically distinct policy lever. The paper examines existing literature on such forums, and identifies characteristics of {"}meetings that matter{"} - those gatherings that appear to have achieved some policy traction in a given domain. Finally, the paper investigates a particular field, cultural policy, to evaluate the extent to which meetings are serving policy purposes. The author concludes that meetings can serve an important role in the policy process by framing public problems and highlighting policy alternatives; creating and sustaining policy communities; fostering policy transfer and knowledge uptake; and developing networks among policy entrepreneurs. Nonetheless, with regard to cultural policy, the author argues that, compared to other policy domains, strategic policy-focused convenings are not a regular part of the arts and culture landscape and remain underused policy tools.",
author = "Steven Tepper",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00092.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "523--542",
journal = "Review of Policy Research",
issn = "0278-4416",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting agendas and designing alternatives

T2 - Policymaking and the strategic role of meetings

AU - Tepper, Steven

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - This paper investigates the role of strategic forums - such as special commissions, task,forces, roundtables, working groups, summits - in the policy process. Reviewing prominent theories about policymaking, the author suggests ways in which strategic forums might fit within these frameworks as an analytically distinct policy lever. The paper examines existing literature on such forums, and identifies characteristics of "meetings that matter" - those gatherings that appear to have achieved some policy traction in a given domain. Finally, the paper investigates a particular field, cultural policy, to evaluate the extent to which meetings are serving policy purposes. The author concludes that meetings can serve an important role in the policy process by framing public problems and highlighting policy alternatives; creating and sustaining policy communities; fostering policy transfer and knowledge uptake; and developing networks among policy entrepreneurs. Nonetheless, with regard to cultural policy, the author argues that, compared to other policy domains, strategic policy-focused convenings are not a regular part of the arts and culture landscape and remain underused policy tools.

AB - This paper investigates the role of strategic forums - such as special commissions, task,forces, roundtables, working groups, summits - in the policy process. Reviewing prominent theories about policymaking, the author suggests ways in which strategic forums might fit within these frameworks as an analytically distinct policy lever. The paper examines existing literature on such forums, and identifies characteristics of "meetings that matter" - those gatherings that appear to have achieved some policy traction in a given domain. Finally, the paper investigates a particular field, cultural policy, to evaluate the extent to which meetings are serving policy purposes. The author concludes that meetings can serve an important role in the policy process by framing public problems and highlighting policy alternatives; creating and sustaining policy communities; fostering policy transfer and knowledge uptake; and developing networks among policy entrepreneurs. Nonetheless, with regard to cultural policy, the author argues that, compared to other policy domains, strategic policy-focused convenings are not a regular part of the arts and culture landscape and remain underused policy tools.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242886161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242886161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00092.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00092.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3242886161

VL - 21

SP - 523

EP - 542

JO - Review of Policy Research

JF - Review of Policy Research

SN - 0278-4416

IS - 4

ER -