Sensitivity of carbon sequestration costs to economic and biological uncertainties

Susan M. Capalbo, John M. Antle, Sian Mooney, Keith Paustian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Modifying current agricultural management practices as a means of sequestering carbon has been shown to be a relatively low cost way to offset greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of the estimates of the amount of soil carbon sequestered and the costs of sequestering carbon to uncertainties in the underlying economic and biological parameters of the modeling framework and to scale of analysis. An application is made to the dryland grain production systems of the US northern Great Plains under a per-hectare payment policy. We show that the resulting changes in the marginal costs and corresponding quantities of soil carbon sequestered are a nonlinear function of the changes in the soil carbon rates, yields, or economic parameters, and depend upon the spatial heterogeneity of the area. The analysis of changes in yields supports the argument that sequestering soil C could be a long-term win-win situation for producers and society. In the short run, providing incentives to producers to switch production practices in order to sequester soil C could lead to higher productivity in the long run that would induce farmers to maintain these practices without incentives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume33
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

soil carbon
carbon sequestration
Carbon
Soils
Economics
incentive
economics
cost
Costs
agricultural management
carbon
production system
management practice
greenhouse gas
soil
productivity
Gas emissions
Greenhouse gases
Productivity
modeling

Keywords

  • Biophysical uncertainty
  • Carbon sequestration
  • Economic uncertainty
  • Integrated Assessment approach
  • Marginal cost of soil C
  • Scale
  • Soil C rates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Sensitivity of carbon sequestration costs to economic and biological uncertainties. / Capalbo, Susan M.; Antle, John M.; Mooney, Sian; Paustian, Keith.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 33, No. SUPPL. 1, 2004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Capalbo, Susan M. ; Antle, John M. ; Mooney, Sian ; Paustian, Keith. / Sensitivity of carbon sequestration costs to economic and biological uncertainties. In: Environmental Management. 2004 ; Vol. 33, No. SUPPL. 1.
@article{d4939d967d8a47fab82c5b004976ad67,
title = "Sensitivity of carbon sequestration costs to economic and biological uncertainties",
abstract = "Modifying current agricultural management practices as a means of sequestering carbon has been shown to be a relatively low cost way to offset greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of the estimates of the amount of soil carbon sequestered and the costs of sequestering carbon to uncertainties in the underlying economic and biological parameters of the modeling framework and to scale of analysis. An application is made to the dryland grain production systems of the US northern Great Plains under a per-hectare payment policy. We show that the resulting changes in the marginal costs and corresponding quantities of soil carbon sequestered are a nonlinear function of the changes in the soil carbon rates, yields, or economic parameters, and depend upon the spatial heterogeneity of the area. The analysis of changes in yields supports the argument that sequestering soil C could be a long-term win-win situation for producers and society. In the short run, providing incentives to producers to switch production practices in order to sequester soil C could lead to higher productivity in the long run that would induce farmers to maintain these practices without incentives.",
keywords = "Biophysical uncertainty, Carbon sequestration, Economic uncertainty, Integrated Assessment approach, Marginal cost of soil C, Scale, Soil C rates",
author = "Capalbo, {Susan M.} and Antle, {John M.} and Sian Mooney and Keith Paustian",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-003-9134-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity of carbon sequestration costs to economic and biological uncertainties

AU - Capalbo, Susan M.

AU - Antle, John M.

AU - Mooney, Sian

AU - Paustian, Keith

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Modifying current agricultural management practices as a means of sequestering carbon has been shown to be a relatively low cost way to offset greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of the estimates of the amount of soil carbon sequestered and the costs of sequestering carbon to uncertainties in the underlying economic and biological parameters of the modeling framework and to scale of analysis. An application is made to the dryland grain production systems of the US northern Great Plains under a per-hectare payment policy. We show that the resulting changes in the marginal costs and corresponding quantities of soil carbon sequestered are a nonlinear function of the changes in the soil carbon rates, yields, or economic parameters, and depend upon the spatial heterogeneity of the area. The analysis of changes in yields supports the argument that sequestering soil C could be a long-term win-win situation for producers and society. In the short run, providing incentives to producers to switch production practices in order to sequester soil C could lead to higher productivity in the long run that would induce farmers to maintain these practices without incentives.

AB - Modifying current agricultural management practices as a means of sequestering carbon has been shown to be a relatively low cost way to offset greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of the estimates of the amount of soil carbon sequestered and the costs of sequestering carbon to uncertainties in the underlying economic and biological parameters of the modeling framework and to scale of analysis. An application is made to the dryland grain production systems of the US northern Great Plains under a per-hectare payment policy. We show that the resulting changes in the marginal costs and corresponding quantities of soil carbon sequestered are a nonlinear function of the changes in the soil carbon rates, yields, or economic parameters, and depend upon the spatial heterogeneity of the area. The analysis of changes in yields supports the argument that sequestering soil C could be a long-term win-win situation for producers and society. In the short run, providing incentives to producers to switch production practices in order to sequester soil C could lead to higher productivity in the long run that would induce farmers to maintain these practices without incentives.

KW - Biophysical uncertainty

KW - Carbon sequestration

KW - Economic uncertainty

KW - Integrated Assessment approach

KW - Marginal cost of soil C

KW - Scale

KW - Soil C rates

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27544483186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27544483186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-003-9134-1

DO - 10.1007/s00267-003-9134-1

M3 - Article

VL - 33

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -