TY - JOUR
T1 - Science and democracy
AU - Fitzpatrick, Susan M.
AU - Cook-Deegan, Robert
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico , CNPq ( 407192/2018-2 ); the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior , CAPES (Finance Code 001 ); and the Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco , FACEPE (APQ- 0108-2.08/14 ; APQ-0711-2.08/16 ; APQ-0414-2.08/17 ). LLSS would like to thank CNPq for graduate scholarship. NDLS thanks CAPES ( 88882.306289/2018-01 ) and FACEPE ( BCT-0148-2.08/18 ) for post-doctoral scholarships.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Susan M. Fitzpatrick and Robert Cook-Deegan critically review an article by Donna Gerardi Riordan titled, 'Research Funding via Direct Democracy: Is It Good for Science?'. The language used to sell Proposition 71 promises more than science can hope to deliver. Concluding a public referendum on a complicated issue fraught with scientific, ethical, legal, and social controversies should not be misinterpreted as giving people a voice. Given the forced choice of Proposition 71, a majority of the citizens of believing California money could accelerate the alchemic process whereby basic research yields medical treatments, voted to cure diabetes and defeat Alzheimer's. Attention may now turn to the serious coordination problem that follows from state research programs. The need for federal funding is arguably reduced in scientific areas where states and other countries have stepped in. Riordan focuses on the results of insulating the program from conventional state legislative and executive processes.
AB - Susan M. Fitzpatrick and Robert Cook-Deegan critically review an article by Donna Gerardi Riordan titled, 'Research Funding via Direct Democracy: Is It Good for Science?'. The language used to sell Proposition 71 promises more than science can hope to deliver. Concluding a public referendum on a complicated issue fraught with scientific, ethical, legal, and social controversies should not be misinterpreted as giving people a voice. Given the forced choice of Proposition 71, a majority of the citizens of believing California money could accelerate the alchemic process whereby basic research yields medical treatments, voted to cure diabetes and defeat Alzheimer's. Attention may now turn to the serious coordination problem that follows from state research programs. The need for federal funding is arguably reduced in scientific areas where states and other countries have stepped in. Riordan focuses on the results of insulating the program from conventional state legislative and executive processes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53849136605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53849136605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:53849136605
SN - 0748-5492
VL - 25
SP - 19
EP - 20
JO - Issues in science and technology
JF - Issues in science and technology
IS - 1
ER -