Schedule impact of alternative framing systems

Colby Robinson, Allan Chasey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Increasingly, owners of semiconductor manufacturing facilities desire new wafer fabrication facilities constructed in less time, for less money, and at higher quality levels. The structural framing systems that support wafer fabrication facility requirements are instrumental in determining how quickly a facility can be constructed and utilized. This article evaluates concrete versus steel for structural framing systems to determine the impact of defined alternatives on the construction schedule Advantages and disadvantages of using alternative structural materials for semiconductor manufacturing plants are discussed. A baseline structure was developed for time analysis. An industry survey was used to collect time data to analyze how structural materials affect the project schedule. All data collected was based on the model structure developed. Case studies of two existing semiconductor facilities were also utilized to augment the survey data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World
Pages747-757
Number of pages11
Volume278
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000
EventConstruction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World - Orlando, FL, United States
Duration: Feb 20 2000Feb 22 2000

Other

OtherConstruction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando, FL
Period2/20/002/22/00

Fingerprint

Semiconductor materials
Fabrication
Model structures
Concretes
Steel
Industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Robinson, C., & Chasey, A. (2000). Schedule impact of alternative framing systems. In Proceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World (Vol. 278, pp. 747-757) https://doi.org/10.1061/40475(278)79

Schedule impact of alternative framing systems. / Robinson, Colby; Chasey, Allan.

Proceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World. Vol. 278 2000. p. 747-757.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Robinson, C & Chasey, A 2000, Schedule impact of alternative framing systems. in Proceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World. vol. 278, pp. 747-757, Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World, Orlando, FL, United States, 2/20/00. https://doi.org/10.1061/40475(278)79
Robinson C, Chasey A. Schedule impact of alternative framing systems. In Proceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World. Vol. 278. 2000. p. 747-757 https://doi.org/10.1061/40475(278)79
Robinson, Colby ; Chasey, Allan. / Schedule impact of alternative framing systems. Proceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World. Vol. 278 2000. pp. 747-757
@inproceedings{5074c59b099c45358c8e219fb94c1b68,
title = "Schedule impact of alternative framing systems",
abstract = "Increasingly, owners of semiconductor manufacturing facilities desire new wafer fabrication facilities constructed in less time, for less money, and at higher quality levels. The structural framing systems that support wafer fabrication facility requirements are instrumental in determining how quickly a facility can be constructed and utilized. This article evaluates concrete versus steel for structural framing systems to determine the impact of defined alternatives on the construction schedule Advantages and disadvantages of using alternative structural materials for semiconductor manufacturing plants are discussed. A baseline structure was developed for time analysis. An industry survey was used to collect time data to analyze how structural materials affect the project schedule. All data collected was based on the model structure developed. Case studies of two existing semiconductor facilities were also utilized to augment the survey data.",
author = "Colby Robinson and Allan Chasey",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1061/40475(278)79",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784404751",
volume = "278",
pages = "747--757",
booktitle = "Proceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Schedule impact of alternative framing systems

AU - Robinson, Colby

AU - Chasey, Allan

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Increasingly, owners of semiconductor manufacturing facilities desire new wafer fabrication facilities constructed in less time, for less money, and at higher quality levels. The structural framing systems that support wafer fabrication facility requirements are instrumental in determining how quickly a facility can be constructed and utilized. This article evaluates concrete versus steel for structural framing systems to determine the impact of defined alternatives on the construction schedule Advantages and disadvantages of using alternative structural materials for semiconductor manufacturing plants are discussed. A baseline structure was developed for time analysis. An industry survey was used to collect time data to analyze how structural materials affect the project schedule. All data collected was based on the model structure developed. Case studies of two existing semiconductor facilities were also utilized to augment the survey data.

AB - Increasingly, owners of semiconductor manufacturing facilities desire new wafer fabrication facilities constructed in less time, for less money, and at higher quality levels. The structural framing systems that support wafer fabrication facility requirements are instrumental in determining how quickly a facility can be constructed and utilized. This article evaluates concrete versus steel for structural framing systems to determine the impact of defined alternatives on the construction schedule Advantages and disadvantages of using alternative structural materials for semiconductor manufacturing plants are discussed. A baseline structure was developed for time analysis. An industry survey was used to collect time data to analyze how structural materials affect the project schedule. All data collected was based on the model structure developed. Case studies of two existing semiconductor facilities were also utilized to augment the survey data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58849160374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58849160374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/40475(278)79

DO - 10.1061/40475(278)79

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:58849160374

SN - 9780784404751

VL - 278

SP - 747

EP - 757

BT - Proceedings of Construction Congress VI: Building Together for a Better Tomorrow in an Increasingly Complex World

ER -