Scale in GIS

An overview

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scale has many meanings, but in GIS two are of greatest significance: resolution and extent. Ideally models of physical process would be defined and tested on scale-free data. In practice spatial resolution will always be limited by cost, data volume, and other factors. Raster data are shown to be preferable to vector data for scientific research because they make spatial resolution explicit. The effects of resolution are discussed for two simple GIS functions. Three theoretical frameworks for discussing spatial resolution are introduced and explored. The problems of cross-scale inference, including the modifiable areal unit problem and the ecological fallacy, are described and illustrated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-9
Number of pages5
JournalGeomorphology
Volume130
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

GIS
spatial resolution
raster
cost

Keywords

  • Ecological fallacy
  • Extent
  • Modifiable areal unit problem
  • Representative fraction
  • Resolution
  • Scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Scale in GIS : An overview. / Goodchild, Michael.

In: Geomorphology, Vol. 130, No. 1-2, 01.07.2011, p. 5-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goodchild, Michael. / Scale in GIS : An overview. In: Geomorphology. 2011 ; Vol. 130, No. 1-2. pp. 5-9.
@article{d6415723064f44e1992d8e6371148048,
title = "Scale in GIS: An overview",
abstract = "Scale has many meanings, but in GIS two are of greatest significance: resolution and extent. Ideally models of physical process would be defined and tested on scale-free data. In practice spatial resolution will always be limited by cost, data volume, and other factors. Raster data are shown to be preferable to vector data for scientific research because they make spatial resolution explicit. The effects of resolution are discussed for two simple GIS functions. Three theoretical frameworks for discussing spatial resolution are introduced and explored. The problems of cross-scale inference, including the modifiable areal unit problem and the ecological fallacy, are described and illustrated.",
keywords = "Ecological fallacy, Extent, Modifiable areal unit problem, Representative fraction, Resolution, Scale",
author = "Michael Goodchild",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "130",
pages = "5--9",
journal = "Geomorphology",
issn = "0169-555X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scale in GIS

T2 - An overview

AU - Goodchild, Michael

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Scale has many meanings, but in GIS two are of greatest significance: resolution and extent. Ideally models of physical process would be defined and tested on scale-free data. In practice spatial resolution will always be limited by cost, data volume, and other factors. Raster data are shown to be preferable to vector data for scientific research because they make spatial resolution explicit. The effects of resolution are discussed for two simple GIS functions. Three theoretical frameworks for discussing spatial resolution are introduced and explored. The problems of cross-scale inference, including the modifiable areal unit problem and the ecological fallacy, are described and illustrated.

AB - Scale has many meanings, but in GIS two are of greatest significance: resolution and extent. Ideally models of physical process would be defined and tested on scale-free data. In practice spatial resolution will always be limited by cost, data volume, and other factors. Raster data are shown to be preferable to vector data for scientific research because they make spatial resolution explicit. The effects of resolution are discussed for two simple GIS functions. Three theoretical frameworks for discussing spatial resolution are introduced and explored. The problems of cross-scale inference, including the modifiable areal unit problem and the ecological fallacy, are described and illustrated.

KW - Ecological fallacy

KW - Extent

KW - Modifiable areal unit problem

KW - Representative fraction

KW - Resolution

KW - Scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954986411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954986411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.004

M3 - Article

VL - 130

SP - 5

EP - 9

JO - Geomorphology

JF - Geomorphology

SN - 0169-555X

IS - 1-2

ER -