Risk perception by patients with anxiety disorders

Randolph Nesse, R. Klaas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies by social psychologists have recently shown that normal people have systematically distorted perceptions of risk. We extend these studies to patients with anxiety disorders to see how they differ from normal subjects, and, more specifically, to test the hypothesis that anxiety disorders might result from excessively objective risk assessments. Fifty patients with anxiety disorders and 50 matched controls estimated the likelihood that 22 events would happen to the average person or to the self. On both measures, and on accuracy, the groups were essentially identical. In confirmation of previously reported patterns of risk distortion, both groups overestimated rare risks, underestimated common risks, and consistently underestimated the relative risks to self. These results suggest that cognitive estimates of specific risks are normal in patients with anxiety disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)465-470
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume182
Issue number8
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anxiety Disorders
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Risk perception by patients with anxiety disorders. / Nesse, Randolph; Klaas, R.

In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 182, No. 8, 1994, p. 465-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{30b7248593c8498cba5f85f1b1728281,
title = "Risk perception by patients with anxiety disorders",
abstract = "Studies by social psychologists have recently shown that normal people have systematically distorted perceptions of risk. We extend these studies to patients with anxiety disorders to see how they differ from normal subjects, and, more specifically, to test the hypothesis that anxiety disorders might result from excessively objective risk assessments. Fifty patients with anxiety disorders and 50 matched controls estimated the likelihood that 22 events would happen to the average person or to the self. On both measures, and on accuracy, the groups were essentially identical. In confirmation of previously reported patterns of risk distortion, both groups overestimated rare risks, underestimated common risks, and consistently underestimated the relative risks to self. These results suggest that cognitive estimates of specific risks are normal in patients with anxiety disorders.",
author = "Randolph Nesse and R. Klaas",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "182",
pages = "465--470",
journal = "Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease",
issn = "0022-3018",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk perception by patients with anxiety disorders

AU - Nesse, Randolph

AU - Klaas, R.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Studies by social psychologists have recently shown that normal people have systematically distorted perceptions of risk. We extend these studies to patients with anxiety disorders to see how they differ from normal subjects, and, more specifically, to test the hypothesis that anxiety disorders might result from excessively objective risk assessments. Fifty patients with anxiety disorders and 50 matched controls estimated the likelihood that 22 events would happen to the average person or to the self. On both measures, and on accuracy, the groups were essentially identical. In confirmation of previously reported patterns of risk distortion, both groups overestimated rare risks, underestimated common risks, and consistently underestimated the relative risks to self. These results suggest that cognitive estimates of specific risks are normal in patients with anxiety disorders.

AB - Studies by social psychologists have recently shown that normal people have systematically distorted perceptions of risk. We extend these studies to patients with anxiety disorders to see how they differ from normal subjects, and, more specifically, to test the hypothesis that anxiety disorders might result from excessively objective risk assessments. Fifty patients with anxiety disorders and 50 matched controls estimated the likelihood that 22 events would happen to the average person or to the self. On both measures, and on accuracy, the groups were essentially identical. In confirmation of previously reported patterns of risk distortion, both groups overestimated rare risks, underestimated common risks, and consistently underestimated the relative risks to self. These results suggest that cognitive estimates of specific risks are normal in patients with anxiety disorders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028027238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028027238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8040658

AN - SCOPUS:0028027238

VL - 182

SP - 465

EP - 470

JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

SN - 0022-3018

IS - 8

ER -