Review: Spinal manipulative therapy is not better than standard treatments for low back pain

W. J. Assendelft; S. C. Morton; E. I. Yu; Martin Underwood

doi:10.1136/ebm.9.6.171

Review: Spinal manipulative therapy is not better than standard treatments for low back pain

W. J. Assendelft, S. C. Morton, E. I. Yu, Martin Underwood

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	171
Number of pages	1
Journal	Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume	9
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.9.6.171
State	Published - Nov 2004
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

Access to Document

10.1136/ebm.9.6.171

Cite this

@article{172baa35443e49c08023e267eb3799cc,

title = "Review: Spinal manipulative therapy is not better than standard treatments for low back pain",

author = "Assendelft, {W. J.} and Morton, {S. C.} and Yu, {E. I.} and Martin Underwood",

year = "2004",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1136/ebm.9.6.171",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "9",

pages = "171",

journal = "Evidence-Based Medicine",

issn = "1356-5524",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review

T2 - Spinal manipulative therapy is not better than standard treatments for low back pain

AU - Assendelft, W. J.

AU - Morton, S. C.

AU - Yu, E. I.

AU - Underwood, Martin

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19744362639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19744362639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ebm.9.6.171

DO - 10.1136/ebm.9.6.171

M3 - Short survey

AN - SCOPUS:19744362639

SN - 1356-5524

VL - 9

SP - 171

JO - Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - Evidence-Based Medicine

IS - 6

ER -

Review: Spinal manipulative therapy is not better than standard treatments for low back pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this