Revealing structures in narratives: A mixed-methods approach to studying interdisciplinary handoff in critical care

Lena Mamykina, Silis Jiang, Sarah A. Collins, Bridget Twohig, Jamie Hirsh, George Hripcsak, R. Stanley Hum, David Kaufman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: To examine a novel mixed-methods approach for studying patterns of clinical communication that could inform future informatics solutions, with a specific focus on handoff within interdisciplinary teams. Materials and methods: Researchers observed, recorded, and transcribed verbal handoff discussions of different members of critical care teams. The transcripts were coded qualitatively, and then analyzed quantitatively for emerging structural patterns using categorical cluster analysis, and for degree of shared mental models (SMM) using the modified Pyramid method. Results: An empirical study using the proposed mixed-methods approach suggested emerging patterns of communication among clinicians. For example, the temporal focus of handoff was often determined by the role of the clinician giving the handoff; the clinical content of handoff was consistent between clinicians, but varied between patients. The SMM index ranged from 0.065 (with the maximum possible overlap score of 1) to 0.007 with a median of 0.026; the overlap was higher in statements concerned with patient presentation (23.6% of these had overlap) and referring to the past (24% overlapped). This calculated SMM index was correlated with the assessment of coherence within the participating teams by independent physicians (r = 0.63, p = 0.038). Conclusions: The proposed novel mixed-methods approach helped to reveal emerging patterns in content and structure of handoff communication and highlight differences due to the clinical context, and to the different priorities of clinicians on interdisciplinary patient care teams. The approach for calculating SMM is more ecologically sensitive as it relies on naturally occurring discourse and less intrusive than traditional ways of assessing SMM, and takes initial steps toward establishing empirical foundation for the design of electronic tools to support handoff in interdisciplinary teams.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)117-124
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Biomedical Informatics
    Volume62
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Critical Care
    Communication
    Patient Care Team
    Informatics
    Cluster analysis
    Cluster Analysis
    Research Personnel
    Physicians

    Keywords

    • Clinical communication
    • Electronic documentation
    • Handoff
    • Shared mental models
    • Teamwork

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Computer Science Applications
    • Health Informatics

    Cite this

    Revealing structures in narratives : A mixed-methods approach to studying interdisciplinary handoff in critical care. / Mamykina, Lena; Jiang, Silis; Collins, Sarah A.; Twohig, Bridget; Hirsh, Jamie; Hripcsak, George; Stanley Hum, R.; Kaufman, David.

    In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 62, 01.08.2016, p. 117-124.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Mamykina, L, Jiang, S, Collins, SA, Twohig, B, Hirsh, J, Hripcsak, G, Stanley Hum, R & Kaufman, D 2016, 'Revealing structures in narratives: A mixed-methods approach to studying interdisciplinary handoff in critical care', Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 62, pp. 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.025
    Mamykina, Lena ; Jiang, Silis ; Collins, Sarah A. ; Twohig, Bridget ; Hirsh, Jamie ; Hripcsak, George ; Stanley Hum, R. ; Kaufman, David. / Revealing structures in narratives : A mixed-methods approach to studying interdisciplinary handoff in critical care. In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2016 ; Vol. 62. pp. 117-124.
    @article{588b557584824bd4994cec1ee8871d8c,
    title = "Revealing structures in narratives: A mixed-methods approach to studying interdisciplinary handoff in critical care",
    abstract = "Objective: To examine a novel mixed-methods approach for studying patterns of clinical communication that could inform future informatics solutions, with a specific focus on handoff within interdisciplinary teams. Materials and methods: Researchers observed, recorded, and transcribed verbal handoff discussions of different members of critical care teams. The transcripts were coded qualitatively, and then analyzed quantitatively for emerging structural patterns using categorical cluster analysis, and for degree of shared mental models (SMM) using the modified Pyramid method. Results: An empirical study using the proposed mixed-methods approach suggested emerging patterns of communication among clinicians. For example, the temporal focus of handoff was often determined by the role of the clinician giving the handoff; the clinical content of handoff was consistent between clinicians, but varied between patients. The SMM index ranged from 0.065 (with the maximum possible overlap score of 1) to 0.007 with a median of 0.026; the overlap was higher in statements concerned with patient presentation (23.6{\%} of these had overlap) and referring to the past (24{\%} overlapped). This calculated SMM index was correlated with the assessment of coherence within the participating teams by independent physicians (r = 0.63, p = 0.038). Conclusions: The proposed novel mixed-methods approach helped to reveal emerging patterns in content and structure of handoff communication and highlight differences due to the clinical context, and to the different priorities of clinicians on interdisciplinary patient care teams. The approach for calculating SMM is more ecologically sensitive as it relies on naturally occurring discourse and less intrusive than traditional ways of assessing SMM, and takes initial steps toward establishing empirical foundation for the design of electronic tools to support handoff in interdisciplinary teams.",
    keywords = "Clinical communication, Electronic documentation, Handoff, Shared mental models, Teamwork",
    author = "Lena Mamykina and Silis Jiang and Collins, {Sarah A.} and Bridget Twohig and Jamie Hirsh and George Hripcsak and {Stanley Hum}, R. and David Kaufman",
    year = "2016",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.025",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "62",
    pages = "117--124",
    journal = "Journal of Biomedical Informatics",
    issn = "1532-0464",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Revealing structures in narratives

    T2 - A mixed-methods approach to studying interdisciplinary handoff in critical care

    AU - Mamykina, Lena

    AU - Jiang, Silis

    AU - Collins, Sarah A.

    AU - Twohig, Bridget

    AU - Hirsh, Jamie

    AU - Hripcsak, George

    AU - Stanley Hum, R.

    AU - Kaufman, David

    PY - 2016/8/1

    Y1 - 2016/8/1

    N2 - Objective: To examine a novel mixed-methods approach for studying patterns of clinical communication that could inform future informatics solutions, with a specific focus on handoff within interdisciplinary teams. Materials and methods: Researchers observed, recorded, and transcribed verbal handoff discussions of different members of critical care teams. The transcripts were coded qualitatively, and then analyzed quantitatively for emerging structural patterns using categorical cluster analysis, and for degree of shared mental models (SMM) using the modified Pyramid method. Results: An empirical study using the proposed mixed-methods approach suggested emerging patterns of communication among clinicians. For example, the temporal focus of handoff was often determined by the role of the clinician giving the handoff; the clinical content of handoff was consistent between clinicians, but varied between patients. The SMM index ranged from 0.065 (with the maximum possible overlap score of 1) to 0.007 with a median of 0.026; the overlap was higher in statements concerned with patient presentation (23.6% of these had overlap) and referring to the past (24% overlapped). This calculated SMM index was correlated with the assessment of coherence within the participating teams by independent physicians (r = 0.63, p = 0.038). Conclusions: The proposed novel mixed-methods approach helped to reveal emerging patterns in content and structure of handoff communication and highlight differences due to the clinical context, and to the different priorities of clinicians on interdisciplinary patient care teams. The approach for calculating SMM is more ecologically sensitive as it relies on naturally occurring discourse and less intrusive than traditional ways of assessing SMM, and takes initial steps toward establishing empirical foundation for the design of electronic tools to support handoff in interdisciplinary teams.

    AB - Objective: To examine a novel mixed-methods approach for studying patterns of clinical communication that could inform future informatics solutions, with a specific focus on handoff within interdisciplinary teams. Materials and methods: Researchers observed, recorded, and transcribed verbal handoff discussions of different members of critical care teams. The transcripts were coded qualitatively, and then analyzed quantitatively for emerging structural patterns using categorical cluster analysis, and for degree of shared mental models (SMM) using the modified Pyramid method. Results: An empirical study using the proposed mixed-methods approach suggested emerging patterns of communication among clinicians. For example, the temporal focus of handoff was often determined by the role of the clinician giving the handoff; the clinical content of handoff was consistent between clinicians, but varied between patients. The SMM index ranged from 0.065 (with the maximum possible overlap score of 1) to 0.007 with a median of 0.026; the overlap was higher in statements concerned with patient presentation (23.6% of these had overlap) and referring to the past (24% overlapped). This calculated SMM index was correlated with the assessment of coherence within the participating teams by independent physicians (r = 0.63, p = 0.038). Conclusions: The proposed novel mixed-methods approach helped to reveal emerging patterns in content and structure of handoff communication and highlight differences due to the clinical context, and to the different priorities of clinicians on interdisciplinary patient care teams. The approach for calculating SMM is more ecologically sensitive as it relies on naturally occurring discourse and less intrusive than traditional ways of assessing SMM, and takes initial steps toward establishing empirical foundation for the design of electronic tools to support handoff in interdisciplinary teams.

    KW - Clinical communication

    KW - Electronic documentation

    KW - Handoff

    KW - Shared mental models

    KW - Teamwork

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977593267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977593267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.025

    DO - 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.025

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 27064124

    AN - SCOPUS:84977593267

    VL - 62

    SP - 117

    EP - 124

    JO - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

    JF - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

    SN - 1532-0464

    ER -