12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An object can be used in multiple contexts, each requiring different hand actions. How the central nervous system builds and maintains memory of such dexterous manipulations remains unclear. We conducted experiments in which human subjects had to learn and recall manipulations performed in two contexts, A and B. Both contexts involved lifting the same L-shaped object whose geometry cued its asymmetrical mass distribution. Correct performance required producing a torque on the vertical handle at object lift onset to prevent it from tilting. The torque direction depended on the context, i.e., object orientation, which was changed by 180° object rotation about a vertical axis. With an A1B1A2context switching paradigm, subjects learned A1in the first block of eight trials as indicated by a torque approaching the required one. However, subjects made large errors in anticipating the required torque when switching to B1immediately after A1(negative transfer), as well as when they had to recall A1when switching to A2after learning B through another block of eight lifts (retrieval interference). Classic sensorimotor learning theories attribute such interferences to multi-rate, multistate error-driven updates of internal models. However, by systematically changing the interblock break duration and within-block number of trials, our results suggest an alternative explanation underlying interference and retention of dexterous manipulation. Specifically, we identified and quantified through a novel computational model the nonlinear interaction between two sensorimotor mechanisms: a shortlived, context-independent, use-dependent sensorimotor memory and a context-sensitive, error-based learning process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-155
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume113
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Torque
Learning
Central Nervous System
Hand
Retention (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Interference
  • Manipulation
  • Retention
  • Sensorimotor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Retention and interference of learned dexterous manipulation : Interaction between multiple sensorimotor processes. / Fu, Qiushi; Santello, Marco.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 113, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 144-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{478e4bb7f31441139025270e0febb53e,
title = "Retention and interference of learned dexterous manipulation: Interaction between multiple sensorimotor processes",
abstract = "An object can be used in multiple contexts, each requiring different hand actions. How the central nervous system builds and maintains memory of such dexterous manipulations remains unclear. We conducted experiments in which human subjects had to learn and recall manipulations performed in two contexts, A and B. Both contexts involved lifting the same L-shaped object whose geometry cued its asymmetrical mass distribution. Correct performance required producing a torque on the vertical handle at object lift onset to prevent it from tilting. The torque direction depended on the context, i.e., object orientation, which was changed by 180° object rotation about a vertical axis. With an A1B1A2context switching paradigm, subjects learned A1in the first block of eight trials as indicated by a torque approaching the required one. However, subjects made large errors in anticipating the required torque when switching to B1immediately after A1(negative transfer), as well as when they had to recall A1when switching to A2after learning B through another block of eight lifts (retrieval interference). Classic sensorimotor learning theories attribute such interferences to multi-rate, multistate error-driven updates of internal models. However, by systematically changing the interblock break duration and within-block number of trials, our results suggest an alternative explanation underlying interference and retention of dexterous manipulation. Specifically, we identified and quantified through a novel computational model the nonlinear interaction between two sensorimotor mechanisms: a shortlived, context-independent, use-dependent sensorimotor memory and a context-sensitive, error-based learning process.",
keywords = "Interference, Manipulation, Retention, Sensorimotor",
author = "Qiushi Fu and Marco Santello",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00348.2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "144--155",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retention and interference of learned dexterous manipulation

T2 - Interaction between multiple sensorimotor processes

AU - Fu, Qiushi

AU - Santello, Marco

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - An object can be used in multiple contexts, each requiring different hand actions. How the central nervous system builds and maintains memory of such dexterous manipulations remains unclear. We conducted experiments in which human subjects had to learn and recall manipulations performed in two contexts, A and B. Both contexts involved lifting the same L-shaped object whose geometry cued its asymmetrical mass distribution. Correct performance required producing a torque on the vertical handle at object lift onset to prevent it from tilting. The torque direction depended on the context, i.e., object orientation, which was changed by 180° object rotation about a vertical axis. With an A1B1A2context switching paradigm, subjects learned A1in the first block of eight trials as indicated by a torque approaching the required one. However, subjects made large errors in anticipating the required torque when switching to B1immediately after A1(negative transfer), as well as when they had to recall A1when switching to A2after learning B through another block of eight lifts (retrieval interference). Classic sensorimotor learning theories attribute such interferences to multi-rate, multistate error-driven updates of internal models. However, by systematically changing the interblock break duration and within-block number of trials, our results suggest an alternative explanation underlying interference and retention of dexterous manipulation. Specifically, we identified and quantified through a novel computational model the nonlinear interaction between two sensorimotor mechanisms: a shortlived, context-independent, use-dependent sensorimotor memory and a context-sensitive, error-based learning process.

AB - An object can be used in multiple contexts, each requiring different hand actions. How the central nervous system builds and maintains memory of such dexterous manipulations remains unclear. We conducted experiments in which human subjects had to learn and recall manipulations performed in two contexts, A and B. Both contexts involved lifting the same L-shaped object whose geometry cued its asymmetrical mass distribution. Correct performance required producing a torque on the vertical handle at object lift onset to prevent it from tilting. The torque direction depended on the context, i.e., object orientation, which was changed by 180° object rotation about a vertical axis. With an A1B1A2context switching paradigm, subjects learned A1in the first block of eight trials as indicated by a torque approaching the required one. However, subjects made large errors in anticipating the required torque when switching to B1immediately after A1(negative transfer), as well as when they had to recall A1when switching to A2after learning B through another block of eight lifts (retrieval interference). Classic sensorimotor learning theories attribute such interferences to multi-rate, multistate error-driven updates of internal models. However, by systematically changing the interblock break duration and within-block number of trials, our results suggest an alternative explanation underlying interference and retention of dexterous manipulation. Specifically, we identified and quantified through a novel computational model the nonlinear interaction between two sensorimotor mechanisms: a shortlived, context-independent, use-dependent sensorimotor memory and a context-sensitive, error-based learning process.

KW - Interference

KW - Manipulation

KW - Retention

KW - Sensorimotor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920911224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920911224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00348.2014

DO - 10.1152/jn.00348.2014

M3 - Article

C2 - 25274349

AN - SCOPUS:84920911224

VL - 113

SP - 144

EP - 155

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 1

ER -