Response to "Revisiting the influence of campaign tone on turnout in senate elections"

Kim L. Fridkin; Patrick J. Kenney

doi:10.1093/pan/mpj005

Response to "Revisiting the influence of campaign tone on turnout in senate elections"

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In sum, we believe that the differences in the impact of negativity found by Jackson and Sides reflect the inadequacy of their operationalization of mudslinging, and the differences are not driven by our choice of a subsample analysis.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	219-222
Number of pages	4
Journal	Political Analysis
Volume	14
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj005
State	Published - Mar 1 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sociology and Political Science
Political Science and International Relations

Access to Document

10.1093/pan/mpj005

Cite this

@article{0bbb5451fe6347c58d86a287665cc874,

title = "Response to {"}Revisiting the influence of campaign tone on turnout in senate elections{"}",

abstract = "In sum, we believe that the differences in the impact of negativity found by Jackson and Sides reflect the inadequacy of their operationalization of mudslinging, and the differences are not driven by our choice of a subsample analysis.",

author = "Fridkin, {Kim L.} and Kenney, {Patrick J.}",

year = "2006",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/pan/mpj005",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "14",

pages = "219--222",

journal = "Political Analysis",

issn = "1047-1987",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to "Revisiting the influence of campaign tone on turnout in senate elections"

AU - Fridkin, Kim L.

AU - Kenney, Patrick J.

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - In sum, we believe that the differences in the impact of negativity found by Jackson and Sides reflect the inadequacy of their operationalization of mudslinging, and the differences are not driven by our choice of a subsample analysis.

AB - In sum, we believe that the differences in the impact of negativity found by Jackson and Sides reflect the inadequacy of their operationalization of mudslinging, and the differences are not driven by our choice of a subsample analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645157460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645157460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/pan/mpj005

DO - 10.1093/pan/mpj005

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:33645157460

SN - 1047-1987

VL - 14

SP - 219

EP - 222

JO - Political Analysis

JF - Political Analysis

IS - 2

ER -

Response to "Revisiting the influence of campaign tone on turnout in senate elections"

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this