Response to "Revisiting the influence of campaign tone on turnout in senate elections"

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

In sum, we believe that the differences in the impact of negativity found by Jackson and Sides reflect the inadequacy of their operationalization of mudslinging, and the differences are not driven by our choice of a subsample analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-222
Number of pages4
JournalPolitical Analysis
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to "Revisiting the influence of campaign tone on turnout in senate elections"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this