TY - JOUR
T1 - Questioning dominant development practices
T2 - Emerging voices of indigenous subalterns
AU - Dutta, Uttaran
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - Guided by modernist monologic epistemologies, the dominant approach to subaltern development espouses economic-centered interventions. Contemporary theorization of development argues that the process fundamentally operates as a discourse to depict the underserved as the site of control. Further, it unilaterally exercises structural forces and applies hegemonic logic to create, sustain, and reinforce the material and communicative marginalization. The culture-centered approach (CCA), an alternative critical communicative framework, calls for a reflexive engagement with the narratives and discourses that emerges from the lived experiences of the subalterns. Grounded in the CCA, this paper uses subaltern discourses to consider the nature and consequences of dominant development practices on the lives of indigenous subalterns of the Himalayan region of eastern India. As such, this study, on the one hand, examines how dominant development practices operate as discourse and creates conditions of marginalization in subaltern spaces. On the other hand, this analysis seeks to foreground the narratives of communicative absences, discursive violence, and subaltern negotiations in the dialogic spaces of decision-making.
AB - Guided by modernist monologic epistemologies, the dominant approach to subaltern development espouses economic-centered interventions. Contemporary theorization of development argues that the process fundamentally operates as a discourse to depict the underserved as the site of control. Further, it unilaterally exercises structural forces and applies hegemonic logic to create, sustain, and reinforce the material and communicative marginalization. The culture-centered approach (CCA), an alternative critical communicative framework, calls for a reflexive engagement with the narratives and discourses that emerges from the lived experiences of the subalterns. Grounded in the CCA, this paper uses subaltern discourses to consider the nature and consequences of dominant development practices on the lives of indigenous subalterns of the Himalayan region of eastern India. As such, this study, on the one hand, examines how dominant development practices operate as discourse and creates conditions of marginalization in subaltern spaces. On the other hand, this analysis seeks to foreground the narratives of communicative absences, discursive violence, and subaltern negotiations in the dialogic spaces of decision-making.
KW - Communication for development
KW - Culture-centered approach
KW - India
KW - Indigenous people
KW - Subaltern
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962766677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962766677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13216597.2015.1052534
DO - 10.1080/13216597.2015.1052534
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84962766677
SN - 1321-6597
VL - 21
SP - 169
EP - 188
JO - Journal of International Communication
JF - Journal of International Communication
IS - 2
ER -