Quantity discrimination in canids

Dogs (Canis familiaris) and wolves (Canis lupus) compared

Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini, Clive Wynne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accumulating evidence indicates that animals are able to discriminate between quantities. Recent studies have shown that dogs’ and coyotes’ ability to discriminate between quantities of food items decreases with increasing numerical ratio. Conversely, wolves’ performance is not affected by numerical ratio. Cross-species comparisons are difficult because of differences in the methodologies employed, and hence it is still unclear whether domestication altered quantitative abilities in canids. Here we used the same procedure to compare pet dogs and wolves in a spontaneous food choice task. Subjects were presented with two quantities of food items and allowed to choose only one option. Four numerical contrasts of increasing difficulty (range 1–4) were used to assess the influence of numerical ratio on the performance of the two species. Dogs’ accuracy was affected by numerical ratio, while no ratio effect was observed in wolves. These results align with previous findings and reinforce the idea of different quantitative competences in dogs and wolves. Although we cannot exclude that other variables might have played a role in shaping quantitative abilities in these two species, our results might suggest that the interspecific differences here reported may have arisen as a result of domestication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-92
Number of pages4
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume144
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

Canidae
Canis lupus
wolves
Aptitude
Dogs
dogs
domestication
Food
Coyotes
Canis latrans
Pets
food choices
Mental Competency
pets
animals
Domestication
methodology

Keywords

  • Dogs
  • Quantity discrimination
  • Spontaneous choice
  • Wolves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Quantity discrimination in canids : Dogs (Canis familiaris) and wolves (Canis lupus) compared. / Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena; Wynne, Clive.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 144, 01.11.2017, p. 89-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87ed4dd98d8b4d46a9727d4ff2aae9fd,
title = "Quantity discrimination in canids: Dogs (Canis familiaris) and wolves (Canis lupus) compared",
abstract = "Accumulating evidence indicates that animals are able to discriminate between quantities. Recent studies have shown that dogs’ and coyotes’ ability to discriminate between quantities of food items decreases with increasing numerical ratio. Conversely, wolves’ performance is not affected by numerical ratio. Cross-species comparisons are difficult because of differences in the methodologies employed, and hence it is still unclear whether domestication altered quantitative abilities in canids. Here we used the same procedure to compare pet dogs and wolves in a spontaneous food choice task. Subjects were presented with two quantities of food items and allowed to choose only one option. Four numerical contrasts of increasing difficulty (range 1–4) were used to assess the influence of numerical ratio on the performance of the two species. Dogs’ accuracy was affected by numerical ratio, while no ratio effect was observed in wolves. These results align with previous findings and reinforce the idea of different quantitative competences in dogs and wolves. Although we cannot exclude that other variables might have played a role in shaping quantitative abilities in these two species, our results might suggest that the interspecific differences here reported may have arisen as a result of domestication.",
keywords = "Dogs, Quantity discrimination, Spontaneous choice, Wolves",
author = "{Miletto Petrazzini}, {Maria Elena} and Clive Wynne",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "89--92",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantity discrimination in canids

T2 - Dogs (Canis familiaris) and wolves (Canis lupus) compared

AU - Miletto Petrazzini, Maria Elena

AU - Wynne, Clive

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Accumulating evidence indicates that animals are able to discriminate between quantities. Recent studies have shown that dogs’ and coyotes’ ability to discriminate between quantities of food items decreases with increasing numerical ratio. Conversely, wolves’ performance is not affected by numerical ratio. Cross-species comparisons are difficult because of differences in the methodologies employed, and hence it is still unclear whether domestication altered quantitative abilities in canids. Here we used the same procedure to compare pet dogs and wolves in a spontaneous food choice task. Subjects were presented with two quantities of food items and allowed to choose only one option. Four numerical contrasts of increasing difficulty (range 1–4) were used to assess the influence of numerical ratio on the performance of the two species. Dogs’ accuracy was affected by numerical ratio, while no ratio effect was observed in wolves. These results align with previous findings and reinforce the idea of different quantitative competences in dogs and wolves. Although we cannot exclude that other variables might have played a role in shaping quantitative abilities in these two species, our results might suggest that the interspecific differences here reported may have arisen as a result of domestication.

AB - Accumulating evidence indicates that animals are able to discriminate between quantities. Recent studies have shown that dogs’ and coyotes’ ability to discriminate between quantities of food items decreases with increasing numerical ratio. Conversely, wolves’ performance is not affected by numerical ratio. Cross-species comparisons are difficult because of differences in the methodologies employed, and hence it is still unclear whether domestication altered quantitative abilities in canids. Here we used the same procedure to compare pet dogs and wolves in a spontaneous food choice task. Subjects were presented with two quantities of food items and allowed to choose only one option. Four numerical contrasts of increasing difficulty (range 1–4) were used to assess the influence of numerical ratio on the performance of the two species. Dogs’ accuracy was affected by numerical ratio, while no ratio effect was observed in wolves. These results align with previous findings and reinforce the idea of different quantitative competences in dogs and wolves. Although we cannot exclude that other variables might have played a role in shaping quantitative abilities in these two species, our results might suggest that the interspecific differences here reported may have arisen as a result of domestication.

KW - Dogs

KW - Quantity discrimination

KW - Spontaneous choice

KW - Wolves

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029782078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029782078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 144

SP - 89

EP - 92

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

ER -