Punitive sentiment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholarship has long noted the importance of understanding the changes that occur over time in aggregate public support for punitive criminal justice policies. Yet, the lack of a reliable and valid measure of this concept limits our understanding of this aspect of the criminal justice system. This research develops a measure of public support for punitive policies from 1951 to 2006 using 242 administrations of 24 unique survey indicators. It argues that punitive sentiment is politically constructed via frames focusing on the permissiveness of the criminal justice system. Punitive sentiment is estimated with an error-correction model showing both the short- and long-term relationships between punitive sentiment and presidential framing of crime, public dissatisfaction with social welfare policies, and perceptions of racial integration. The results highlight the complex dynamics responsible for the change over time in punitive sentiment as well as the possibilities of obtaining public support for alternative solutions to crime.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-364
Number of pages36
JournalCriminology
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Criminal Law
public support
Crime
justice
Permissiveness
offense
criminal justice policy
Social Perception
Social Welfare
Public Policy
social welfare
social policy
lack
Research
time

Keywords

  • Public opinion
  • Punishment
  • Time series

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Punitive sentiment. / Ramirez, Mark.

In: Criminology, Vol. 51, No. 2, 05.2013, p. 329-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramirez, Mark. / Punitive sentiment. In: Criminology. 2013 ; Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 329-364.
@article{07c3c4ba0e1d4f3a887008abe6a87de1,
title = "Punitive sentiment",
abstract = "Scholarship has long noted the importance of understanding the changes that occur over time in aggregate public support for punitive criminal justice policies. Yet, the lack of a reliable and valid measure of this concept limits our understanding of this aspect of the criminal justice system. This research develops a measure of public support for punitive policies from 1951 to 2006 using 242 administrations of 24 unique survey indicators. It argues that punitive sentiment is politically constructed via frames focusing on the permissiveness of the criminal justice system. Punitive sentiment is estimated with an error-correction model showing both the short- and long-term relationships between punitive sentiment and presidential framing of crime, public dissatisfaction with social welfare policies, and perceptions of racial integration. The results highlight the complex dynamics responsible for the change over time in punitive sentiment as well as the possibilities of obtaining public support for alternative solutions to crime.",
keywords = "Public opinion, Punishment, Time series",
author = "Mark Ramirez",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/1745-9125.12007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "329--364",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Punitive sentiment

AU - Ramirez, Mark

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Scholarship has long noted the importance of understanding the changes that occur over time in aggregate public support for punitive criminal justice policies. Yet, the lack of a reliable and valid measure of this concept limits our understanding of this aspect of the criminal justice system. This research develops a measure of public support for punitive policies from 1951 to 2006 using 242 administrations of 24 unique survey indicators. It argues that punitive sentiment is politically constructed via frames focusing on the permissiveness of the criminal justice system. Punitive sentiment is estimated with an error-correction model showing both the short- and long-term relationships between punitive sentiment and presidential framing of crime, public dissatisfaction with social welfare policies, and perceptions of racial integration. The results highlight the complex dynamics responsible for the change over time in punitive sentiment as well as the possibilities of obtaining public support for alternative solutions to crime.

AB - Scholarship has long noted the importance of understanding the changes that occur over time in aggregate public support for punitive criminal justice policies. Yet, the lack of a reliable and valid measure of this concept limits our understanding of this aspect of the criminal justice system. This research develops a measure of public support for punitive policies from 1951 to 2006 using 242 administrations of 24 unique survey indicators. It argues that punitive sentiment is politically constructed via frames focusing on the permissiveness of the criminal justice system. Punitive sentiment is estimated with an error-correction model showing both the short- and long-term relationships between punitive sentiment and presidential framing of crime, public dissatisfaction with social welfare policies, and perceptions of racial integration. The results highlight the complex dynamics responsible for the change over time in punitive sentiment as well as the possibilities of obtaining public support for alternative solutions to crime.

KW - Public opinion

KW - Punishment

KW - Time series

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877653441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877653441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1745-9125.12007

DO - 10.1111/1745-9125.12007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877653441

VL - 51

SP - 329

EP - 364

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 2

ER -