Public Attitudes toward Private Military Companies: Insights from Principal–agent Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the distribution and correlates of mass attitudes toward the privatization of US military operations. Relying on insights from principal–agent theory, we form predictions about what beliefs are associated with a willingness to grant authority over military operations to private military companies (PMCs). The model predicts that citizens’ beliefs about actor motives, accountability, and costs are associated with attitudes toward PMCs. Using a nationally representative survey, we find that beliefs about the profit-oriented motives of private firms and perceptions of their lack of accountability reduce support for the use of PMCs, particularly in combat operations. By contrast, belief in private firms’ superior fiscal efficiency increases support for utilizing PMCs in both combat and noncombat operations. The results illustrate the usefulness of principle-agent theory for understanding mass attitudes and help to improve the field’s understanding of the contours of public attitudes toward US defense policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

private security and military companies
Military
firm
defense policy
responsibility
privatization
profit
citizen
efficiency
Public attitudes
Principal-agent theory
lack
costs

Keywords

  • military contractors
  • principal–agent theory
  • private military companies
  • public opinion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{f27541f828b447b08738e6832d2db1ab,
title = "Public Attitudes toward Private Military Companies: Insights from Principal–agent Theory",
abstract = "This article examines the distribution and correlates of mass attitudes toward the privatization of US military operations. Relying on insights from principal–agent theory, we form predictions about what beliefs are associated with a willingness to grant authority over military operations to private military companies (PMCs). The model predicts that citizens’ beliefs about actor motives, accountability, and costs are associated with attitudes toward PMCs. Using a nationally representative survey, we find that beliefs about the profit-oriented motives of private firms and perceptions of their lack of accountability reduce support for the use of PMCs, particularly in combat operations. By contrast, belief in private firms’ superior fiscal efficiency increases support for utilizing PMCs in both combat and noncombat operations. The results illustrate the usefulness of principle-agent theory for understanding mass attitudes and help to improve the field’s understanding of the contours of public attitudes toward US defense policy.",
keywords = "military contractors, principal–agent theory, private military companies, public opinion",
author = "Mark Ramirez and Reed Wood",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022002718797166",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public Attitudes toward Private Military Companies

T2 - Insights from Principal–agent Theory

AU - Ramirez, Mark

AU - Wood, Reed

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This article examines the distribution and correlates of mass attitudes toward the privatization of US military operations. Relying on insights from principal–agent theory, we form predictions about what beliefs are associated with a willingness to grant authority over military operations to private military companies (PMCs). The model predicts that citizens’ beliefs about actor motives, accountability, and costs are associated with attitudes toward PMCs. Using a nationally representative survey, we find that beliefs about the profit-oriented motives of private firms and perceptions of their lack of accountability reduce support for the use of PMCs, particularly in combat operations. By contrast, belief in private firms’ superior fiscal efficiency increases support for utilizing PMCs in both combat and noncombat operations. The results illustrate the usefulness of principle-agent theory for understanding mass attitudes and help to improve the field’s understanding of the contours of public attitudes toward US defense policy.

AB - This article examines the distribution and correlates of mass attitudes toward the privatization of US military operations. Relying on insights from principal–agent theory, we form predictions about what beliefs are associated with a willingness to grant authority over military operations to private military companies (PMCs). The model predicts that citizens’ beliefs about actor motives, accountability, and costs are associated with attitudes toward PMCs. Using a nationally representative survey, we find that beliefs about the profit-oriented motives of private firms and perceptions of their lack of accountability reduce support for the use of PMCs, particularly in combat operations. By contrast, belief in private firms’ superior fiscal efficiency increases support for utilizing PMCs in both combat and noncombat operations. The results illustrate the usefulness of principle-agent theory for understanding mass attitudes and help to improve the field’s understanding of the contours of public attitudes toward US defense policy.

KW - military contractors

KW - principal–agent theory

KW - private military companies

KW - public opinion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059557218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059557218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002718797166

DO - 10.1177/0022002718797166

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059557218

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

ER -