TY - JOUR
T1 - Providing High-Quality Education in Juvenile Corrections
T2 - Next Steps
AU - Gagnon, Joseph Calvin
AU - Mason-Williams, Loretta
AU - Clark, Heather Griller
AU - LaBelle, Brittany
AU - Mathur, Sarup R.
AU - Leone, Peter E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Global Alliance for Behavioral Health and Social Justice
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - In 2014, the U.S. Departments of Education and Justice (U.S. DOE/DOJ) jointly released the Guiding Principles for Providing High-Quality Education in Juvenile Justice Secure Care Settings to provide recommendations within five principles that affect education, including safety (i.e., behavioral and mental health interventions), funding, staffing, curriculum and instruction, and reentry. However, no systematic review has evaluated the research within and across the Guiding Principles since their publication. The purpose of the current article is to (a) describe the literature review process that resulted in 36 studies across all of the principles, (b) briefly summarize information from the separate literature reviews focusing on behavior, mental health, and curriculum and instruction for which no separate literature reviews have been conducted, (c) provide detail concerning studies focusing on staffing and reentry, and (d) identify patterns across studies in all of the reviews, particularly related to study quality. In addition, we provide implications for research, policy, and practice.
AB - In 2014, the U.S. Departments of Education and Justice (U.S. DOE/DOJ) jointly released the Guiding Principles for Providing High-Quality Education in Juvenile Justice Secure Care Settings to provide recommendations within five principles that affect education, including safety (i.e., behavioral and mental health interventions), funding, staffing, curriculum and instruction, and reentry. However, no systematic review has evaluated the research within and across the Guiding Principles since their publication. The purpose of the current article is to (a) describe the literature review process that resulted in 36 studies across all of the principles, (b) briefly summarize information from the separate literature reviews focusing on behavior, mental health, and curriculum and instruction for which no separate literature reviews have been conducted, (c) provide detail concerning studies focusing on staffing and reentry, and (d) identify patterns across studies in all of the reviews, particularly related to study quality. In addition, we provide implications for research, policy, and practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125079033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125079033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/ort0000612
DO - 10.1037/ort0000612
M3 - Article
C2 - 35130005
AN - SCOPUS:85125079033
JO - American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
JF - American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
SN - 0002-9432
ER -