Problems with mitigation translocation of herpetofauna

Brian Sullivan, Erika M. Nowak, Matthew A. Kwiatkowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mitigation translocation of nuisance animals is a commonly used management practice aimed at resolution of human-animal conflict by removal and release of an individual animal. Long considered a reasonable undertaking, especially by the general public, it is now known that translocated subjects are negatively affected by the practice. Mitigation translocation is typically undertaken with individual adult organisms and has a much lower success rate than the more widely practiced conservation translocation of threatened and endangered species. Nonetheless, the public and many conservation practitioners believe that because population-level conservation translocations have been successful that mitigation translocation can be satisfactorily applied to a wide variety of human-wildlife conflict situations. We reviewed mitigation translocations of reptiles, including our own work with 3 long-lived species (Gila monsters [Heloderma suspectum], Sonoran desert tortoises [Gopherus morafkai], and western diamond-backed rattlesnakes [Crotalus atrox]). Overall, mitigation translocation had a low success rate when judged either by effects on individuals (in all studies reviewed they exhibited increased movement or increased mortality) or by the success of the resolution of the human-animal conflict (translocated individuals often returned to the capture site). Careful planning and identification of knowledge gaps are critical to increasing success rates in mitigation translocations in the face of increasing pressure to find solutions for species threatened by diverse anthropogenic factors, including climate change and exurban and energy development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-18
Number of pages7
JournalConservation Biology
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

herpetofauna
translocation
mitigation
threatened species
Gopherus morafkai
animals
Crotalus atrox
human-wildlife relations
Gopherus agassizii
Sonoran Desert
animal
endangered species
reptiles
planning
climate change
organisms
energy
reptile
diamond
management practice

Keywords

  • Alternative energy
  • Crotalus
  • Gopherus
  • Heloderma
  • Nuisance animal
  • Reptile conservation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Problems with mitigation translocation of herpetofauna. / Sullivan, Brian; Nowak, Erika M.; Kwiatkowski, Matthew A.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.02.2015, p. 12-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sullivan, Brian ; Nowak, Erika M. ; Kwiatkowski, Matthew A. / Problems with mitigation translocation of herpetofauna. In: Conservation Biology. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 12-18.
@article{079f7315ed764f9998d48851a811e65d,
title = "Problems with mitigation translocation of herpetofauna",
abstract = "Mitigation translocation of nuisance animals is a commonly used management practice aimed at resolution of human-animal conflict by removal and release of an individual animal. Long considered a reasonable undertaking, especially by the general public, it is now known that translocated subjects are negatively affected by the practice. Mitigation translocation is typically undertaken with individual adult organisms and has a much lower success rate than the more widely practiced conservation translocation of threatened and endangered species. Nonetheless, the public and many conservation practitioners believe that because population-level conservation translocations have been successful that mitigation translocation can be satisfactorily applied to a wide variety of human-wildlife conflict situations. We reviewed mitigation translocations of reptiles, including our own work with 3 long-lived species (Gila monsters [Heloderma suspectum], Sonoran desert tortoises [Gopherus morafkai], and western diamond-backed rattlesnakes [Crotalus atrox]). Overall, mitigation translocation had a low success rate when judged either by effects on individuals (in all studies reviewed they exhibited increased movement or increased mortality) or by the success of the resolution of the human-animal conflict (translocated individuals often returned to the capture site). Careful planning and identification of knowledge gaps are critical to increasing success rates in mitigation translocations in the face of increasing pressure to find solutions for species threatened by diverse anthropogenic factors, including climate change and exurban and energy development.",
keywords = "Alternative energy, Crotalus, Gopherus, Heloderma, Nuisance animal, Reptile conservation",
author = "Brian Sullivan and Nowak, {Erika M.} and Kwiatkowski, {Matthew A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cobi.12336",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "12--18",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problems with mitigation translocation of herpetofauna

AU - Sullivan, Brian

AU - Nowak, Erika M.

AU - Kwiatkowski, Matthew A.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Mitigation translocation of nuisance animals is a commonly used management practice aimed at resolution of human-animal conflict by removal and release of an individual animal. Long considered a reasonable undertaking, especially by the general public, it is now known that translocated subjects are negatively affected by the practice. Mitigation translocation is typically undertaken with individual adult organisms and has a much lower success rate than the more widely practiced conservation translocation of threatened and endangered species. Nonetheless, the public and many conservation practitioners believe that because population-level conservation translocations have been successful that mitigation translocation can be satisfactorily applied to a wide variety of human-wildlife conflict situations. We reviewed mitigation translocations of reptiles, including our own work with 3 long-lived species (Gila monsters [Heloderma suspectum], Sonoran desert tortoises [Gopherus morafkai], and western diamond-backed rattlesnakes [Crotalus atrox]). Overall, mitigation translocation had a low success rate when judged either by effects on individuals (in all studies reviewed they exhibited increased movement or increased mortality) or by the success of the resolution of the human-animal conflict (translocated individuals often returned to the capture site). Careful planning and identification of knowledge gaps are critical to increasing success rates in mitigation translocations in the face of increasing pressure to find solutions for species threatened by diverse anthropogenic factors, including climate change and exurban and energy development.

AB - Mitigation translocation of nuisance animals is a commonly used management practice aimed at resolution of human-animal conflict by removal and release of an individual animal. Long considered a reasonable undertaking, especially by the general public, it is now known that translocated subjects are negatively affected by the practice. Mitigation translocation is typically undertaken with individual adult organisms and has a much lower success rate than the more widely practiced conservation translocation of threatened and endangered species. Nonetheless, the public and many conservation practitioners believe that because population-level conservation translocations have been successful that mitigation translocation can be satisfactorily applied to a wide variety of human-wildlife conflict situations. We reviewed mitigation translocations of reptiles, including our own work with 3 long-lived species (Gila monsters [Heloderma suspectum], Sonoran desert tortoises [Gopherus morafkai], and western diamond-backed rattlesnakes [Crotalus atrox]). Overall, mitigation translocation had a low success rate when judged either by effects on individuals (in all studies reviewed they exhibited increased movement or increased mortality) or by the success of the resolution of the human-animal conflict (translocated individuals often returned to the capture site). Careful planning and identification of knowledge gaps are critical to increasing success rates in mitigation translocations in the face of increasing pressure to find solutions for species threatened by diverse anthropogenic factors, including climate change and exurban and energy development.

KW - Alternative energy

KW - Crotalus

KW - Gopherus

KW - Heloderma

KW - Nuisance animal

KW - Reptile conservation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921436490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921436490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.12336

DO - 10.1111/cobi.12336

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 12

EP - 18

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 1

ER -