Power as a determinant of executive compensation

Arden Grabke-Rundell, Luis Gomez-Mejia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most empirical investigations on the disassociation between executive compensation and firm performance have been done using agency theory. Agency theory alludes to a power imbalance favorable to the executives, allowing them to pursue their self-interest in the form of large pay packages. However, because of its roots in the economic discipline, agency theory has led researchers to test financial rather than behavioral hypotheses. Over 70 years of research has been conducted on the pay-form-performance relationship, but only a few significant relationships have been found. This paper attempts to incorporate behavioral conjectures of power into the agency theory framework to provide a comprehensive approach to testing executive pay. Agency theory is combined with the resource dependency theory and with specific measures of power developed by Finkelstein (1992) for a more complete executive pay model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-23
Number of pages21
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Incentive Reimbursement
Compensation and Redress
Economics
Research Personnel
Research
Agency theory
Executive compensation

Keywords

  • Agency theory
  • Board governance
  • CEO pay
  • Executive compensation
  • Executive entrenchment
  • Executive power
  • Managerialism
  • Ownership power
  • Resource dependency theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Power as a determinant of executive compensation. / Grabke-Rundell, Arden; Gomez-Mejia, Luis.

In: Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2002, p. 3-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{04a1c63d7136415fb9cf234f2ec45f28,
title = "Power as a determinant of executive compensation",
abstract = "Most empirical investigations on the disassociation between executive compensation and firm performance have been done using agency theory. Agency theory alludes to a power imbalance favorable to the executives, allowing them to pursue their self-interest in the form of large pay packages. However, because of its roots in the economic discipline, agency theory has led researchers to test financial rather than behavioral hypotheses. Over 70 years of research has been conducted on the pay-form-performance relationship, but only a few significant relationships have been found. This paper attempts to incorporate behavioral conjectures of power into the agency theory framework to provide a comprehensive approach to testing executive pay. Agency theory is combined with the resource dependency theory and with specific measures of power developed by Finkelstein (1992) for a more complete executive pay model.",
keywords = "Agency theory, Board governance, CEO pay, Executive compensation, Executive entrenchment, Executive power, Managerialism, Ownership power, Resource dependency theory",
author = "Arden Grabke-Rundell and Luis Gomez-Mejia",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00038-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "3--23",
journal = "Human Resource Management Review",
issn = "1053-4822",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power as a determinant of executive compensation

AU - Grabke-Rundell, Arden

AU - Gomez-Mejia, Luis

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Most empirical investigations on the disassociation between executive compensation and firm performance have been done using agency theory. Agency theory alludes to a power imbalance favorable to the executives, allowing them to pursue their self-interest in the form of large pay packages. However, because of its roots in the economic discipline, agency theory has led researchers to test financial rather than behavioral hypotheses. Over 70 years of research has been conducted on the pay-form-performance relationship, but only a few significant relationships have been found. This paper attempts to incorporate behavioral conjectures of power into the agency theory framework to provide a comprehensive approach to testing executive pay. Agency theory is combined with the resource dependency theory and with specific measures of power developed by Finkelstein (1992) for a more complete executive pay model.

AB - Most empirical investigations on the disassociation between executive compensation and firm performance have been done using agency theory. Agency theory alludes to a power imbalance favorable to the executives, allowing them to pursue their self-interest in the form of large pay packages. However, because of its roots in the economic discipline, agency theory has led researchers to test financial rather than behavioral hypotheses. Over 70 years of research has been conducted on the pay-form-performance relationship, but only a few significant relationships have been found. This paper attempts to incorporate behavioral conjectures of power into the agency theory framework to provide a comprehensive approach to testing executive pay. Agency theory is combined with the resource dependency theory and with specific measures of power developed by Finkelstein (1992) for a more complete executive pay model.

KW - Agency theory

KW - Board governance

KW - CEO pay

KW - Executive compensation

KW - Executive entrenchment

KW - Executive power

KW - Managerialism

KW - Ownership power

KW - Resource dependency theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10644232340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10644232340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00038-9

DO - 10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00038-9

M3 - Review article

VL - 12

SP - 3

EP - 23

JO - Human Resource Management Review

JF - Human Resource Management Review

SN - 1053-4822

IS - 1

ER -