Physical education pedagogy faculty perceptions of journal quality

Stephen Silverman, Pamela Kulinna, Sharon R. Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examined perceived journal quality by physical education pedagogy faculty members. Participants (N = 273) were identified in three ways and recruited through e-mail. Based on research in other fields investigating journal quality and on publication patterns in physical education, a web-based survey was used to examine (a) whether participants knew a journal and viewed it as scholarly, (b) ratings of journal quality, (c) what factors influenced their ratings, and (d) demographic and scholarly productivity measures. There was a wide range of journals known by the participants and clear indicators of which journals had higher and lower perceived quality. There were differences in ratings between those employed at master's and doctoral institutions and relationships between scholarly productivity and the number of journals known. The results provide strong indications of journal quality for those who have reasons to evaluate journals in physical education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)134-154
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Teaching in Physical Education
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Keywords

  • Institutional type
  • Journal prestige
  • Journal ratings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Physical education pedagogy faculty perceptions of journal quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this