Perspectives on assessment of educational technologies for informal learning

Wilhelmina Savenye

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Informal learning is a complex area, yet one that increasingly involves educational technologists in practice and research. Informal learning includes many different settings, contexts and goals, and draws upon many fields. Two fields that have yielded considerable research literature are museum/free-choice learning and informal science education. While some have defined informal learning as nonschool learning, the nature of informal learning includes dimensions such as location, timing, structure, control, pacing, regulation and content, and so informal learning is not necessarily tied to space. This means that informal learning can and does occur frequently in museums, after-school clubs, botanical gardens, zoos, science centers, and community centers, but can also be engaged in at home and also be integrated within formal school or college settings. Informal science education, museum learning and workplace learning are designed for varied outcomes and have different frameworks. Reasons for assessing for informal learning include to provide formative feedback to participants and to provide evaluation data to improve the organization's learning goals. Methods for assessment for informal learning encompass both quantitative and qualitative approaches, including traditional tests and measures, but primarily rely on such methods as surveys, group and individual interviews, observations, artifact and product analysis, and sometimes ethnographic or case studies. Emerging educational technologies, such as social media, Web 2.0 tools, eLearning and online learning, provide fertile ground for continuing developments in informal learning and assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
Subtitle of host publicationFourth Edition
PublisherSpringer New York
Pages257-267
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781461431855
ISBN (Print)9781461431848
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

informal learning
educational technology
museum
learning
community center
clubs
learning organization
science
social media
school
education
artifact
data analysis
workplace
regulation

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Evaluation
  • Informal learning
  • Informal science education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Savenye, W. (2014). Perspectives on assessment of educational technologies for informal learning. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition (pp. 257-267). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_21

Perspectives on assessment of educational technologies for informal learning. / Savenye, Wilhelmina.

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition. Springer New York, 2014. p. 257-267.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Savenye, W 2014, Perspectives on assessment of educational technologies for informal learning. in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition. Springer New York, pp. 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_21
Savenye W. Perspectives on assessment of educational technologies for informal learning. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition. Springer New York. 2014. p. 257-267 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_21
Savenye, Wilhelmina. / Perspectives on assessment of educational technologies for informal learning. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition. Springer New York, 2014. pp. 257-267
@inbook{866d9305b90d462f993eced102c1ebda,
title = "Perspectives on assessment of educational technologies for informal learning",
abstract = "Informal learning is a complex area, yet one that increasingly involves educational technologists in practice and research. Informal learning includes many different settings, contexts and goals, and draws upon many fields. Two fields that have yielded considerable research literature are museum/free-choice learning and informal science education. While some have defined informal learning as nonschool learning, the nature of informal learning includes dimensions such as location, timing, structure, control, pacing, regulation and content, and so informal learning is not necessarily tied to space. This means that informal learning can and does occur frequently in museums, after-school clubs, botanical gardens, zoos, science centers, and community centers, but can also be engaged in at home and also be integrated within formal school or college settings. Informal science education, museum learning and workplace learning are designed for varied outcomes and have different frameworks. Reasons for assessing for informal learning include to provide formative feedback to participants and to provide evaluation data to improve the organization's learning goals. Methods for assessment for informal learning encompass both quantitative and qualitative approaches, including traditional tests and measures, but primarily rely on such methods as surveys, group and individual interviews, observations, artifact and product analysis, and sometimes ethnographic or case studies. Emerging educational technologies, such as social media, Web 2.0 tools, eLearning and online learning, provide fertile ground for continuing developments in informal learning and assessment.",
keywords = "Assessment, Evaluation, Informal learning, Informal science education",
author = "Wilhelmina Savenye",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_21",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781461431848",
pages = "257--267",
booktitle = "Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology",
publisher = "Springer New York",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Perspectives on assessment of educational technologies for informal learning

AU - Savenye, Wilhelmina

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Informal learning is a complex area, yet one that increasingly involves educational technologists in practice and research. Informal learning includes many different settings, contexts and goals, and draws upon many fields. Two fields that have yielded considerable research literature are museum/free-choice learning and informal science education. While some have defined informal learning as nonschool learning, the nature of informal learning includes dimensions such as location, timing, structure, control, pacing, regulation and content, and so informal learning is not necessarily tied to space. This means that informal learning can and does occur frequently in museums, after-school clubs, botanical gardens, zoos, science centers, and community centers, but can also be engaged in at home and also be integrated within formal school or college settings. Informal science education, museum learning and workplace learning are designed for varied outcomes and have different frameworks. Reasons for assessing for informal learning include to provide formative feedback to participants and to provide evaluation data to improve the organization's learning goals. Methods for assessment for informal learning encompass both quantitative and qualitative approaches, including traditional tests and measures, but primarily rely on such methods as surveys, group and individual interviews, observations, artifact and product analysis, and sometimes ethnographic or case studies. Emerging educational technologies, such as social media, Web 2.0 tools, eLearning and online learning, provide fertile ground for continuing developments in informal learning and assessment.

AB - Informal learning is a complex area, yet one that increasingly involves educational technologists in practice and research. Informal learning includes many different settings, contexts and goals, and draws upon many fields. Two fields that have yielded considerable research literature are museum/free-choice learning and informal science education. While some have defined informal learning as nonschool learning, the nature of informal learning includes dimensions such as location, timing, structure, control, pacing, regulation and content, and so informal learning is not necessarily tied to space. This means that informal learning can and does occur frequently in museums, after-school clubs, botanical gardens, zoos, science centers, and community centers, but can also be engaged in at home and also be integrated within formal school or college settings. Informal science education, museum learning and workplace learning are designed for varied outcomes and have different frameworks. Reasons for assessing for informal learning include to provide formative feedback to participants and to provide evaluation data to improve the organization's learning goals. Methods for assessment for informal learning encompass both quantitative and qualitative approaches, including traditional tests and measures, but primarily rely on such methods as surveys, group and individual interviews, observations, artifact and product analysis, and sometimes ethnographic or case studies. Emerging educational technologies, such as social media, Web 2.0 tools, eLearning and online learning, provide fertile ground for continuing developments in informal learning and assessment.

KW - Assessment

KW - Evaluation

KW - Informal learning

KW - Informal science education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995728276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995728276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_21

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_21

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781461431848

SP - 257

EP - 267

BT - Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology

PB - Springer New York

ER -