Perceived risk and citizen preferences for governmental management of routine hazards

Brian Gerber, Grant W. Neeley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Risk perceptions are important to the policy process because they inform individuals' preferences for government management of hazards that affect personal safety, public health, or ecological conditions. Studies of risk in the policy process have often focused on explicating the determinants of risk perceptions for highly salient, high consequence hazards (e.g., nuclear energy). We argue that it is useful to also study more routinely experienced hazards; doing so shows the relevance of risk perceptions in individuals' daily lives. Our investigation focuses on the impact perceived risk has on citizens' preferences over hazard management policies (as distinct from identifying risk perception determinants per se). We use a recursive structural equation model to analyze public opinion data measuring attitudes in three distinct issue domains: air pollution, crime, and hazardous waste storage and disposal. We find that citizens utilize perceived risk rationally: greater perceived risk generally produces support for more proactive government to manage potential hazards. This perceived risk-policy response relationship generally holds even though the policy options respondents were asked to consider entailed nontrivial costs to the public. The exception seems to be when individuals know less about the substantive issue domain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-418
Number of pages24
JournalPolicy Studies Journal
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

risk perception
hazard
citizen
management
hazard management
crime
hazardous waste
waste disposal
public health
atmospheric pollution
determinants
policy
safety
nuclear energy
air pollution
structural model
public opinion
cost
offense
costs

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Crime
  • Hazardous waste
  • Hazards management
  • Policy preferences
  • Risk perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Perceived risk and citizen preferences for governmental management of routine hazards. / Gerber, Brian; Neeley, Grant W.

In: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 33, No. 3, 08.2005, p. 395-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e20efaaa3506473d8c8644d5b0be86cf,
title = "Perceived risk and citizen preferences for governmental management of routine hazards",
abstract = "Risk perceptions are important to the policy process because they inform individuals' preferences for government management of hazards that affect personal safety, public health, or ecological conditions. Studies of risk in the policy process have often focused on explicating the determinants of risk perceptions for highly salient, high consequence hazards (e.g., nuclear energy). We argue that it is useful to also study more routinely experienced hazards; doing so shows the relevance of risk perceptions in individuals' daily lives. Our investigation focuses on the impact perceived risk has on citizens' preferences over hazard management policies (as distinct from identifying risk perception determinants per se). We use a recursive structural equation model to analyze public opinion data measuring attitudes in three distinct issue domains: air pollution, crime, and hazardous waste storage and disposal. We find that citizens utilize perceived risk rationally: greater perceived risk generally produces support for more proactive government to manage potential hazards. This perceived risk-policy response relationship generally holds even though the policy options respondents were asked to consider entailed nontrivial costs to the public. The exception seems to be when individuals know less about the substantive issue domain.",
keywords = "Air pollution, Crime, Hazardous waste, Hazards management, Policy preferences, Risk perception",
author = "Brian Gerber and Neeley, {Grant W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00122.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "395--418",
journal = "Policy Studies Journal",
issn = "0190-292X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived risk and citizen preferences for governmental management of routine hazards

AU - Gerber, Brian

AU - Neeley, Grant W.

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Risk perceptions are important to the policy process because they inform individuals' preferences for government management of hazards that affect personal safety, public health, or ecological conditions. Studies of risk in the policy process have often focused on explicating the determinants of risk perceptions for highly salient, high consequence hazards (e.g., nuclear energy). We argue that it is useful to also study more routinely experienced hazards; doing so shows the relevance of risk perceptions in individuals' daily lives. Our investigation focuses on the impact perceived risk has on citizens' preferences over hazard management policies (as distinct from identifying risk perception determinants per se). We use a recursive structural equation model to analyze public opinion data measuring attitudes in three distinct issue domains: air pollution, crime, and hazardous waste storage and disposal. We find that citizens utilize perceived risk rationally: greater perceived risk generally produces support for more proactive government to manage potential hazards. This perceived risk-policy response relationship generally holds even though the policy options respondents were asked to consider entailed nontrivial costs to the public. The exception seems to be when individuals know less about the substantive issue domain.

AB - Risk perceptions are important to the policy process because they inform individuals' preferences for government management of hazards that affect personal safety, public health, or ecological conditions. Studies of risk in the policy process have often focused on explicating the determinants of risk perceptions for highly salient, high consequence hazards (e.g., nuclear energy). We argue that it is useful to also study more routinely experienced hazards; doing so shows the relevance of risk perceptions in individuals' daily lives. Our investigation focuses on the impact perceived risk has on citizens' preferences over hazard management policies (as distinct from identifying risk perception determinants per se). We use a recursive structural equation model to analyze public opinion data measuring attitudes in three distinct issue domains: air pollution, crime, and hazardous waste storage and disposal. We find that citizens utilize perceived risk rationally: greater perceived risk generally produces support for more proactive government to manage potential hazards. This perceived risk-policy response relationship generally holds even though the policy options respondents were asked to consider entailed nontrivial costs to the public. The exception seems to be when individuals know less about the substantive issue domain.

KW - Air pollution

KW - Crime

KW - Hazardous waste

KW - Hazards management

KW - Policy preferences

KW - Risk perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844457546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23844457546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00122.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00122.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:23844457546

VL - 33

SP - 395

EP - 418

JO - Policy Studies Journal

JF - Policy Studies Journal

SN - 0190-292X

IS - 3

ER -