@article{84e367b97f174c0b8e29643a1efa7e81,
title = "Peer review and the courts, or when scientists “get real”",
author = "Chubin, {Daryl E.} and Hackett, {Edward J.} and Solomon, {Shana M.}",
note = "Funding Information: generally accepted knowledge. But inherent in the procedures used to produce scientific and technical knowledge, the decision seems to assume that there is a single, true scientific method that judges can examine to determine the soundness of the testimony. Scientific researchers and philosophers of science have spent frustrating decades in pursuit of the holy grail of true scientific practice, while historians, anthropologists, and sociologists of science have documented the diversity of {"}sound{"} scientific research practices and their tenuous connection with the quality of scientific results. (Anyone acquainted with recent efforts by the National Academy of Sciences, the National Science Foundation, and the Public Health Service to establish standards of proper research conduct knows the complexities of such judgments.)",
year = "1995",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08989629508573863",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Accountability in Research",
issn = "0898-9621",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",
}