Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia

A new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions

Ralph H. Hruban, N. Volkan Adsay, Jorge Albores-Saavedra, Carolyn Compton, Elizabeth S. Garrett, Steven N. Goodman, Scott E. Kern, David S. Klimstra, Günter Klöppel, Daniel S. Longnecker, Jutta Lüttges, G. Johan A Offerhaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

848 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proliferative epithelial lesions in the smaller caliber pancreatic ducts and ductules have been the subject of numerous morphologic, clinical, and genetic studies; however, a standard nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for classifying these lesion have not been established. To evaluate the uniformity of existing systems for grading duct lesions in the pancreas, 35 microscopic slides with 35 representative duct lesions were sent to eight expert pathologists from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Kappa values for interobserver agreement could not be calculated initially because more than 70 different diagnostic terms were used by the eight pathologists. In several cases, the diagnoses rendered for a single duct lesion ranged from "hyperplasia," to "metaplasia," to "dysplasia," to "carcinoma in situ." This review therefore demonstrated the need for a standard nomenclature and classification system. Subsequently, during a working group meeting, the pathologists agreed to adopt a single standard system. The terminology pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (or PanIN) was selected, and diagnostic criteria for each grade of PanIN were established (http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_panin). This new system was then evaluated by having the eight pathologists rereview the original 35 cases. Only seven different diagnoses were rendered, and kappa values of 0.43, 0.14, and 0.42 were obtained for PanINs 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Cases assigned other diagnoses (e.g., squamous metaplasia) collectively had a kappa value of 0.41. These results show both the potential of the classification system, and also the difficulty of classifying these lesions even with a consistent nomenclature. However, even when there is lack of consensus, having a restricted set of descriptions and terms allows a better understanding of the reasons for disagreement. It is suggested that we adopt and apply this system uniformly, with continued study of its reliability and use, and possibly further refinement. The acceptance of a standard classification system will facilitate the study of pancreatic duct lesions, and will lead ultimately to a better understanding of their biologic importance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)579-586
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pancreatic Ducts
Terminology
Metaplasia
Pancreas
Neoplasms
Group Processes
Carcinoma in Situ
Canada
Hyperplasia
Consensus
Pathology
Pathologists

Keywords

  • Carcinoma
  • In situ
  • Neoplasia
  • Pancreas
  • Pancreatic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia : A new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions. / Hruban, Ralph H.; Adsay, N. Volkan; Albores-Saavedra, Jorge; Compton, Carolyn; Garrett, Elizabeth S.; Goodman, Steven N.; Kern, Scott E.; Klimstra, David S.; Klöppel, Günter; Longnecker, Daniel S.; Lüttges, Jutta; Offerhaus, G. Johan A.

In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2001, p. 579-586.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hruban, RH, Adsay, NV, Albores-Saavedra, J, Compton, C, Garrett, ES, Goodman, SN, Kern, SE, Klimstra, DS, Klöppel, G, Longnecker, DS, Lüttges, J & Offerhaus, GJA 2001, 'Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: A new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions', American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 579-586. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200105000-00003
Hruban, Ralph H. ; Adsay, N. Volkan ; Albores-Saavedra, Jorge ; Compton, Carolyn ; Garrett, Elizabeth S. ; Goodman, Steven N. ; Kern, Scott E. ; Klimstra, David S. ; Klöppel, Günter ; Longnecker, Daniel S. ; Lüttges, Jutta ; Offerhaus, G. Johan A. / Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia : A new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions. In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2001 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 579-586.
@article{fc60e109342d417e9975a6eb5c85a269,
title = "Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: A new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions",
abstract = "Proliferative epithelial lesions in the smaller caliber pancreatic ducts and ductules have been the subject of numerous morphologic, clinical, and genetic studies; however, a standard nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for classifying these lesion have not been established. To evaluate the uniformity of existing systems for grading duct lesions in the pancreas, 35 microscopic slides with 35 representative duct lesions were sent to eight expert pathologists from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Kappa values for interobserver agreement could not be calculated initially because more than 70 different diagnostic terms were used by the eight pathologists. In several cases, the diagnoses rendered for a single duct lesion ranged from {"}hyperplasia,{"} to {"}metaplasia,{"} to {"}dysplasia,{"} to {"}carcinoma in situ.{"} This review therefore demonstrated the need for a standard nomenclature and classification system. Subsequently, during a working group meeting, the pathologists agreed to adopt a single standard system. The terminology pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (or PanIN) was selected, and diagnostic criteria for each grade of PanIN were established (http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_panin). This new system was then evaluated by having the eight pathologists rereview the original 35 cases. Only seven different diagnoses were rendered, and kappa values of 0.43, 0.14, and 0.42 were obtained for PanINs 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Cases assigned other diagnoses (e.g., squamous metaplasia) collectively had a kappa value of 0.41. These results show both the potential of the classification system, and also the difficulty of classifying these lesions even with a consistent nomenclature. However, even when there is lack of consensus, having a restricted set of descriptions and terms allows a better understanding of the reasons for disagreement. It is suggested that we adopt and apply this system uniformly, with continued study of its reliability and use, and possibly further refinement. The acceptance of a standard classification system will facilitate the study of pancreatic duct lesions, and will lead ultimately to a better understanding of their biologic importance.",
keywords = "Carcinoma, In situ, Neoplasia, Pancreas, Pancreatic",
author = "Hruban, {Ralph H.} and Adsay, {N. Volkan} and Jorge Albores-Saavedra and Carolyn Compton and Garrett, {Elizabeth S.} and Goodman, {Steven N.} and Kern, {Scott E.} and Klimstra, {David S.} and G{\"u}nter Kl{\"o}ppel and Longnecker, {Daniel S.} and Jutta L{\"u}ttges and Offerhaus, {G. Johan A}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1097/00000478-200105000-00003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "579--586",
journal = "American Journal of Surgical Pathology",
issn = "0147-5185",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia

T2 - A new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions

AU - Hruban, Ralph H.

AU - Adsay, N. Volkan

AU - Albores-Saavedra, Jorge

AU - Compton, Carolyn

AU - Garrett, Elizabeth S.

AU - Goodman, Steven N.

AU - Kern, Scott E.

AU - Klimstra, David S.

AU - Klöppel, Günter

AU - Longnecker, Daniel S.

AU - Lüttges, Jutta

AU - Offerhaus, G. Johan A

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Proliferative epithelial lesions in the smaller caliber pancreatic ducts and ductules have been the subject of numerous morphologic, clinical, and genetic studies; however, a standard nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for classifying these lesion have not been established. To evaluate the uniformity of existing systems for grading duct lesions in the pancreas, 35 microscopic slides with 35 representative duct lesions were sent to eight expert pathologists from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Kappa values for interobserver agreement could not be calculated initially because more than 70 different diagnostic terms were used by the eight pathologists. In several cases, the diagnoses rendered for a single duct lesion ranged from "hyperplasia," to "metaplasia," to "dysplasia," to "carcinoma in situ." This review therefore demonstrated the need for a standard nomenclature and classification system. Subsequently, during a working group meeting, the pathologists agreed to adopt a single standard system. The terminology pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (or PanIN) was selected, and diagnostic criteria for each grade of PanIN were established (http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_panin). This new system was then evaluated by having the eight pathologists rereview the original 35 cases. Only seven different diagnoses were rendered, and kappa values of 0.43, 0.14, and 0.42 were obtained for PanINs 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Cases assigned other diagnoses (e.g., squamous metaplasia) collectively had a kappa value of 0.41. These results show both the potential of the classification system, and also the difficulty of classifying these lesions even with a consistent nomenclature. However, even when there is lack of consensus, having a restricted set of descriptions and terms allows a better understanding of the reasons for disagreement. It is suggested that we adopt and apply this system uniformly, with continued study of its reliability and use, and possibly further refinement. The acceptance of a standard classification system will facilitate the study of pancreatic duct lesions, and will lead ultimately to a better understanding of their biologic importance.

AB - Proliferative epithelial lesions in the smaller caliber pancreatic ducts and ductules have been the subject of numerous morphologic, clinical, and genetic studies; however, a standard nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for classifying these lesion have not been established. To evaluate the uniformity of existing systems for grading duct lesions in the pancreas, 35 microscopic slides with 35 representative duct lesions were sent to eight expert pathologists from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Kappa values for interobserver agreement could not be calculated initially because more than 70 different diagnostic terms were used by the eight pathologists. In several cases, the diagnoses rendered for a single duct lesion ranged from "hyperplasia," to "metaplasia," to "dysplasia," to "carcinoma in situ." This review therefore demonstrated the need for a standard nomenclature and classification system. Subsequently, during a working group meeting, the pathologists agreed to adopt a single standard system. The terminology pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (or PanIN) was selected, and diagnostic criteria for each grade of PanIN were established (http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_panin). This new system was then evaluated by having the eight pathologists rereview the original 35 cases. Only seven different diagnoses were rendered, and kappa values of 0.43, 0.14, and 0.42 were obtained for PanINs 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Cases assigned other diagnoses (e.g., squamous metaplasia) collectively had a kappa value of 0.41. These results show both the potential of the classification system, and also the difficulty of classifying these lesions even with a consistent nomenclature. However, even when there is lack of consensus, having a restricted set of descriptions and terms allows a better understanding of the reasons for disagreement. It is suggested that we adopt and apply this system uniformly, with continued study of its reliability and use, and possibly further refinement. The acceptance of a standard classification system will facilitate the study of pancreatic duct lesions, and will lead ultimately to a better understanding of their biologic importance.

KW - Carcinoma

KW - In situ

KW - Neoplasia

KW - Pancreas

KW - Pancreatic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035020633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035020633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000478-200105000-00003

DO - 10.1097/00000478-200105000-00003

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 579

EP - 586

JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

SN - 0147-5185

IS - 5

ER -