Pair-production supernovae: Theory and observation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Nonrotating stars that end their lives with masses 140 M ≤ M* ≤ 260 M should explode as pair-production supernovae (PPSNe). Here I review the physical properties of these objects, as well as the prospects for them to be observationally constrained. In very massive stars, much of the pressure support comes from the radiation field, meaning that they are loosely bound, and that (d lg p/d lg ρ)adiabatic near the center is close to the minimum value necessary for stability. Near the end of C/O burning, the central temperature increases to the point that photons begin to be converted into electron-positron pairs, softening the equation of state below this critical value. The result is a runaway collapse, followed by explosive burning that completely obliterates the loosely bound star. While these explosions can be up to 100 times more energetic than core collapse and Type Ia supernovae, their peak luminosities are only slightly greater. However, due both to copious Ni56 production and hydrogen recombination, they are brighter much longer, and remain observable for ≈1 year. Since metal enrichment is a local process, PPSNe should occur in pockets of metal-free gas over a broad range of redshifts, greatly enhancing their detectability, and distributing their nucleosynthetic products about the Milky Way. This means that measurements of the abundances of metal-free stars should be thought of as directly constraining these objects. It also means that ongoing supernova searches, which limit the contribution of very massive stars to ≲ 1% of the total star-formation-rate density out to z ≈ 2, already provide weak constraints for PPSN models. A survey with the NIRCam instrument on JWST, on the other hand, would be able to extend these limits to z ≈ 10. Observing a 0.3 deg2 patch of sky for ≈1 week per year for three consecutive years, such a program would either detect or rule out the existence of these remarkable objects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMassive Stars
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages209-227
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9780511770593
ISBN (Print)9780521762632
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

pair production
supernovae
massive stars
stars
metals
hydrogen recombinations
James Webb Space Telescope
electron-positron pairs
distributing
star formation rate
softening
radiation distribution
explosions
sky
equations of state
physical properties
luminosity
photons
products
gases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Pair-production supernovae : Theory and observation. / Scannapieco, Evan.

Massive Stars. Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 209-227.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Scannapieco, Evan. / Pair-production supernovae : Theory and observation. Massive Stars. Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 209-227
@inbook{b1b18ee93a0048c6a30e690a964498c6,
title = "Pair-production supernovae: Theory and observation",
abstract = "Nonrotating stars that end their lives with masses 140 M⊙ ≤ M* ≤ 260 M⊙ should explode as pair-production supernovae (PPSNe). Here I review the physical properties of these objects, as well as the prospects for them to be observationally constrained. In very massive stars, much of the pressure support comes from the radiation field, meaning that they are loosely bound, and that (d lg p/d lg ρ)adiabatic near the center is close to the minimum value necessary for stability. Near the end of C/O burning, the central temperature increases to the point that photons begin to be converted into electron-positron pairs, softening the equation of state below this critical value. The result is a runaway collapse, followed by explosive burning that completely obliterates the loosely bound star. While these explosions can be up to 100 times more energetic than core collapse and Type Ia supernovae, their peak luminosities are only slightly greater. However, due both to copious Ni56 production and hydrogen recombination, they are brighter much longer, and remain observable for ≈1 year. Since metal enrichment is a local process, PPSNe should occur in pockets of metal-free gas over a broad range of redshifts, greatly enhancing their detectability, and distributing their nucleosynthetic products about the Milky Way. This means that measurements of the abundances of metal-free stars should be thought of as directly constraining these objects. It also means that ongoing supernova searches, which limit the contribution of very massive stars to ≲ 1{\%} of the total star-formation-rate density out to z ≈ 2, already provide weak constraints for PPSN models. A survey with the NIRCam instrument on JWST, on the other hand, would be able to extend these limits to z ≈ 10. Observing a 0.3 deg2 patch of sky for ≈1 week per year for three consecutive years, such a program would either detect or rule out the existence of these remarkable objects.",
author = "Evan Scannapieco",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511770593.016",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521762632",
pages = "209--227",
booktitle = "Massive Stars",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Pair-production supernovae

T2 - Theory and observation

AU - Scannapieco, Evan

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Nonrotating stars that end their lives with masses 140 M⊙ ≤ M* ≤ 260 M⊙ should explode as pair-production supernovae (PPSNe). Here I review the physical properties of these objects, as well as the prospects for them to be observationally constrained. In very massive stars, much of the pressure support comes from the radiation field, meaning that they are loosely bound, and that (d lg p/d lg ρ)adiabatic near the center is close to the minimum value necessary for stability. Near the end of C/O burning, the central temperature increases to the point that photons begin to be converted into electron-positron pairs, softening the equation of state below this critical value. The result is a runaway collapse, followed by explosive burning that completely obliterates the loosely bound star. While these explosions can be up to 100 times more energetic than core collapse and Type Ia supernovae, their peak luminosities are only slightly greater. However, due both to copious Ni56 production and hydrogen recombination, they are brighter much longer, and remain observable for ≈1 year. Since metal enrichment is a local process, PPSNe should occur in pockets of metal-free gas over a broad range of redshifts, greatly enhancing their detectability, and distributing their nucleosynthetic products about the Milky Way. This means that measurements of the abundances of metal-free stars should be thought of as directly constraining these objects. It also means that ongoing supernova searches, which limit the contribution of very massive stars to ≲ 1% of the total star-formation-rate density out to z ≈ 2, already provide weak constraints for PPSN models. A survey with the NIRCam instrument on JWST, on the other hand, would be able to extend these limits to z ≈ 10. Observing a 0.3 deg2 patch of sky for ≈1 week per year for three consecutive years, such a program would either detect or rule out the existence of these remarkable objects.

AB - Nonrotating stars that end their lives with masses 140 M⊙ ≤ M* ≤ 260 M⊙ should explode as pair-production supernovae (PPSNe). Here I review the physical properties of these objects, as well as the prospects for them to be observationally constrained. In very massive stars, much of the pressure support comes from the radiation field, meaning that they are loosely bound, and that (d lg p/d lg ρ)adiabatic near the center is close to the minimum value necessary for stability. Near the end of C/O burning, the central temperature increases to the point that photons begin to be converted into electron-positron pairs, softening the equation of state below this critical value. The result is a runaway collapse, followed by explosive burning that completely obliterates the loosely bound star. While these explosions can be up to 100 times more energetic than core collapse and Type Ia supernovae, their peak luminosities are only slightly greater. However, due both to copious Ni56 production and hydrogen recombination, they are brighter much longer, and remain observable for ≈1 year. Since metal enrichment is a local process, PPSNe should occur in pockets of metal-free gas over a broad range of redshifts, greatly enhancing their detectability, and distributing their nucleosynthetic products about the Milky Way. This means that measurements of the abundances of metal-free stars should be thought of as directly constraining these objects. It also means that ongoing supernova searches, which limit the contribution of very massive stars to ≲ 1% of the total star-formation-rate density out to z ≈ 2, already provide weak constraints for PPSN models. A survey with the NIRCam instrument on JWST, on the other hand, would be able to extend these limits to z ≈ 10. Observing a 0.3 deg2 patch of sky for ≈1 week per year for three consecutive years, such a program would either detect or rule out the existence of these remarkable objects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011324150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011324150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511770593.016

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511770593.016

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85011324150

SN - 9780521762632

SP - 209

EP - 227

BT - Massive Stars

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -