Organ procurement organizations Internet enrollment for organ donation: Abandoning informed consent

Sandra Woien, Mohamed Y. Rady, Joseph L. Verheijde, Joan McGregor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Requirements for organ donation after cardiac or imminent death have been introduced to address the transplantable organs shortage in the United States. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) increasingly use the Internet for organ donation consent. Methods: An analysis of OPO Web sites available to the public for enrollment and consent for organ donation. The Web sites and consent forms were examined for the minimal information recommended by the United States Department of Health and Human Services for informed consent. Content scores were calculated as percentages of data elements in four information categories: donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, donation promotion, and informed consent. Results: There were 60 Web sites for organ donation enrollment serving the 52 states. The median percent (10 percentile-90 percentile) content scores of the Web sites for donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, and donation promotion were 33% (20-47), 79% (57-86), and 75% (50-100), respectively. The informed consent score was 0% (0-33). The content scores for donor knowledge and informed consent were significantly lower than donor consent reinforcement and donation promotion for all Web sites (P < .05). The content scores for the four categories were similar among the 11 regions of the United Network for Organ Sharing. Conclusion: The Web sites and consent forms for public enrollment in organ donation do not fulfill the necessary requirements for informed consent. The Web sites predominantly provide positive reinforcement and promotional information rather than the transparent disclosure of organ donation process. Independent regulatory oversight is essential to ensure that Internet enrollment for organ donation complies with legal and ethical standards for informed consent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number14
JournalBMC Medical Ethics
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 22 2006

Fingerprint

organ donation
Tissue and Organ Procurement
Informed Consent
Internet
Organizations
reinforcement
donation
promotion
Consent Forms
United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
shortage
Disclosure
death
health
Reinforcement (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Organ procurement organizations Internet enrollment for organ donation : Abandoning informed consent. / Woien, Sandra; Rady, Mohamed Y.; Verheijde, Joseph L.; McGregor, Joan.

In: BMC Medical Ethics, Vol. 7, 14, 22.12.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0fabf1a3503429fbc44675b0affa220,
title = "Organ procurement organizations Internet enrollment for organ donation: Abandoning informed consent",
abstract = "Background: Requirements for organ donation after cardiac or imminent death have been introduced to address the transplantable organs shortage in the United States. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) increasingly use the Internet for organ donation consent. Methods: An analysis of OPO Web sites available to the public for enrollment and consent for organ donation. The Web sites and consent forms were examined for the minimal information recommended by the United States Department of Health and Human Services for informed consent. Content scores were calculated as percentages of data elements in four information categories: donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, donation promotion, and informed consent. Results: There were 60 Web sites for organ donation enrollment serving the 52 states. The median percent (10 percentile-90 percentile) content scores of the Web sites for donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, and donation promotion were 33{\%} (20-47), 79{\%} (57-86), and 75{\%} (50-100), respectively. The informed consent score was 0{\%} (0-33). The content scores for donor knowledge and informed consent were significantly lower than donor consent reinforcement and donation promotion for all Web sites (P < .05). The content scores for the four categories were similar among the 11 regions of the United Network for Organ Sharing. Conclusion: The Web sites and consent forms for public enrollment in organ donation do not fulfill the necessary requirements for informed consent. The Web sites predominantly provide positive reinforcement and promotional information rather than the transparent disclosure of organ donation process. Independent regulatory oversight is essential to ensure that Internet enrollment for organ donation complies with legal and ethical standards for informed consent.",
author = "Sandra Woien and Rady, {Mohamed Y.} and Verheijde, {Joseph L.} and Joan McGregor",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6939-7-14",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "BMC Medical Ethics",
issn = "1472-6939",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organ procurement organizations Internet enrollment for organ donation

T2 - Abandoning informed consent

AU - Woien, Sandra

AU - Rady, Mohamed Y.

AU - Verheijde, Joseph L.

AU - McGregor, Joan

PY - 2006/12/22

Y1 - 2006/12/22

N2 - Background: Requirements for organ donation after cardiac or imminent death have been introduced to address the transplantable organs shortage in the United States. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) increasingly use the Internet for organ donation consent. Methods: An analysis of OPO Web sites available to the public for enrollment and consent for organ donation. The Web sites and consent forms were examined for the minimal information recommended by the United States Department of Health and Human Services for informed consent. Content scores were calculated as percentages of data elements in four information categories: donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, donation promotion, and informed consent. Results: There were 60 Web sites for organ donation enrollment serving the 52 states. The median percent (10 percentile-90 percentile) content scores of the Web sites for donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, and donation promotion were 33% (20-47), 79% (57-86), and 75% (50-100), respectively. The informed consent score was 0% (0-33). The content scores for donor knowledge and informed consent were significantly lower than donor consent reinforcement and donation promotion for all Web sites (P < .05). The content scores for the four categories were similar among the 11 regions of the United Network for Organ Sharing. Conclusion: The Web sites and consent forms for public enrollment in organ donation do not fulfill the necessary requirements for informed consent. The Web sites predominantly provide positive reinforcement and promotional information rather than the transparent disclosure of organ donation process. Independent regulatory oversight is essential to ensure that Internet enrollment for organ donation complies with legal and ethical standards for informed consent.

AB - Background: Requirements for organ donation after cardiac or imminent death have been introduced to address the transplantable organs shortage in the United States. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) increasingly use the Internet for organ donation consent. Methods: An analysis of OPO Web sites available to the public for enrollment and consent for organ donation. The Web sites and consent forms were examined for the minimal information recommended by the United States Department of Health and Human Services for informed consent. Content scores were calculated as percentages of data elements in four information categories: donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, donation promotion, and informed consent. Results: There were 60 Web sites for organ donation enrollment serving the 52 states. The median percent (10 percentile-90 percentile) content scores of the Web sites for donor knowledge, donor consent reinforcement, and donation promotion were 33% (20-47), 79% (57-86), and 75% (50-100), respectively. The informed consent score was 0% (0-33). The content scores for donor knowledge and informed consent were significantly lower than donor consent reinforcement and donation promotion for all Web sites (P < .05). The content scores for the four categories were similar among the 11 regions of the United Network for Organ Sharing. Conclusion: The Web sites and consent forms for public enrollment in organ donation do not fulfill the necessary requirements for informed consent. The Web sites predominantly provide positive reinforcement and promotional information rather than the transparent disclosure of organ donation process. Independent regulatory oversight is essential to ensure that Internet enrollment for organ donation complies with legal and ethical standards for informed consent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846536154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846536154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6939-7-14

DO - 10.1186/1472-6939-7-14

M3 - Article

C2 - 17187671

AN - SCOPUS:33846536154

VL - 7

JO - BMC Medical Ethics

JF - BMC Medical Ethics

SN - 1472-6939

M1 - 14

ER -