Optimal timing of comb construction by honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies: A dynamic programming model and experimental tests

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Honeybee colonies, like organisms, should exhibit optimal design in their temporal pattern of resource allocation to somatic structures. A vital colony structure is the comb which stores honey for overwinter survival. However, the timing of comb construction poses a dilemma to a colony attempting to maximize its honey reserves. On the one hand, plenty of empty comb is needed for efficient exploitation of temporally unpredictable flower blooms. On the other hand, because comb is made from energetically expensive wax, its construction too early or in excessive amounts will reduce the amount of honey available for winter thermoregulation and brood-rearing. A dynamic optimization model concludes that colonies should add new comb only when they have filled their old comb with food and brood above a threshold level. The threshold increases with time until, at the end of the season, building is never an optimal behavior. The temporal pattern of construction predicted by the model - pulses of building coincident with periods of nectar intake and comb fullness - matches that seen in an actual colony observed over the course of an entire foraging season. When nectar sources are rich but temporally clumped, the model also predicts that bees should be sensitive to nectar intake, employing much higher thresholds on days when nectar is not available than on days when it is. Even under poorer and more dispersed nectar regimes, little fitness cost is paid by colonies replacing the optimal strategy with a simpler rule of thumb calling for new construction only when two conditions are met: (1) a fullness threshold has been exceeded, and (2) nectar is currently being collected. Experiments demonstrate that colonies do in fact use such a rule of thumb to control the onset of construction. However, once they have begun building, the bees continue as long as nectar collection persists, regardless of changes in comb fullness. Thus the onset and duration of comb-building bouts appear to be under partially independent control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-42
Number of pages13
JournalBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Apis mellifera
  • Dynamic programming
  • Honeybee
  • Nest construction
  • Resource allocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal timing of comb construction by honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies: A dynamic programming model and experimental tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this