Optimal approaches for balancing invasive species eradication and endangered species management

Adam Lampert, Alan Hastings, Edwin D. Grosholz, Sunny L. Jardine, James N. Sanchirico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Resolving conflicting ecosystem management goals - such as maintaining fisheries while conserving marine species or harvesting timber while preserving habitat - is a widely recognized challenge. Even more challenging may be conflicts between two conservation goals that are typically considered complementary. Here, we model a case where eradication of an invasive plant, hybrid Spartina, threatens the recovery of an endangered bird that uses Spartina for nesting. Achieving both goals requires restoration of native Spartina. We show that the optimal management entails less intensive treatment over longer time scales to fit with the time scale of natural processes. In contrast, both eradication and restoration, when considered separately, would optimally proceed as fast as possible. Thus, managers should simultaneously consider multiple, potentially conflicting goals, which may require flexibility in the timing of expenditures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1028-1031
Number of pages4
JournalScience
Volume344
Issue number6187
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Time Scales
Invasive Species
Endangered Species
Restoration
Eradication
Expenditure
Ecosystem
Fisheries
Habitat
Recovery
Conservation
Managers
Timber
Birds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Lampert, A., Hastings, A., Grosholz, E. D., Jardine, S. L., & Sanchirico, J. N. (2014). Optimal approaches for balancing invasive species eradication and endangered species management. Science, 344(6187), 1028-1031. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250763

Optimal approaches for balancing invasive species eradication and endangered species management. / Lampert, Adam; Hastings, Alan; Grosholz, Edwin D.; Jardine, Sunny L.; Sanchirico, James N.

In: Science, Vol. 344, No. 6187, 2014, p. 1028-1031.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lampert, A, Hastings, A, Grosholz, ED, Jardine, SL & Sanchirico, JN 2014, 'Optimal approaches for balancing invasive species eradication and endangered species management', Science, vol. 344, no. 6187, pp. 1028-1031. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250763
Lampert, Adam ; Hastings, Alan ; Grosholz, Edwin D. ; Jardine, Sunny L. ; Sanchirico, James N. / Optimal approaches for balancing invasive species eradication and endangered species management. In: Science. 2014 ; Vol. 344, No. 6187. pp. 1028-1031.
@article{910f7ecbfb6844b084e64f0618d2915a,
title = "Optimal approaches for balancing invasive species eradication and endangered species management",
abstract = "Resolving conflicting ecosystem management goals - such as maintaining fisheries while conserving marine species or harvesting timber while preserving habitat - is a widely recognized challenge. Even more challenging may be conflicts between two conservation goals that are typically considered complementary. Here, we model a case where eradication of an invasive plant, hybrid Spartina, threatens the recovery of an endangered bird that uses Spartina for nesting. Achieving both goals requires restoration of native Spartina. We show that the optimal management entails less intensive treatment over longer time scales to fit with the time scale of natural processes. In contrast, both eradication and restoration, when considered separately, would optimally proceed as fast as possible. Thus, managers should simultaneously consider multiple, potentially conflicting goals, which may require flexibility in the timing of expenditures.",
author = "Adam Lampert and Alan Hastings and Grosholz, {Edwin D.} and Jardine, {Sunny L.} and Sanchirico, {James N.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1126/science.1250763",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "344",
pages = "1028--1031",
journal = "Science",
issn = "0036-8075",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
number = "6187",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal approaches for balancing invasive species eradication and endangered species management

AU - Lampert, Adam

AU - Hastings, Alan

AU - Grosholz, Edwin D.

AU - Jardine, Sunny L.

AU - Sanchirico, James N.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Resolving conflicting ecosystem management goals - such as maintaining fisheries while conserving marine species or harvesting timber while preserving habitat - is a widely recognized challenge. Even more challenging may be conflicts between two conservation goals that are typically considered complementary. Here, we model a case where eradication of an invasive plant, hybrid Spartina, threatens the recovery of an endangered bird that uses Spartina for nesting. Achieving both goals requires restoration of native Spartina. We show that the optimal management entails less intensive treatment over longer time scales to fit with the time scale of natural processes. In contrast, both eradication and restoration, when considered separately, would optimally proceed as fast as possible. Thus, managers should simultaneously consider multiple, potentially conflicting goals, which may require flexibility in the timing of expenditures.

AB - Resolving conflicting ecosystem management goals - such as maintaining fisheries while conserving marine species or harvesting timber while preserving habitat - is a widely recognized challenge. Even more challenging may be conflicts between two conservation goals that are typically considered complementary. Here, we model a case where eradication of an invasive plant, hybrid Spartina, threatens the recovery of an endangered bird that uses Spartina for nesting. Achieving both goals requires restoration of native Spartina. We show that the optimal management entails less intensive treatment over longer time scales to fit with the time scale of natural processes. In contrast, both eradication and restoration, when considered separately, would optimally proceed as fast as possible. Thus, managers should simultaneously consider multiple, potentially conflicting goals, which may require flexibility in the timing of expenditures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901625698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901625698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.1250763

DO - 10.1126/science.1250763

M3 - Article

C2 - 24876497

AN - SCOPUS:84901625698

VL - 344

SP - 1028

EP - 1031

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 6187

ER -