On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Underlying any understanding of the mode, tempo and relative importance of the adaptive process in the evolution of natural populations is the notion of whether adaptation is mutation limited. Two very different population genetic models have recently been proposed in which the rate of adaptation is not strongly limited by the rate at which newly arising beneficial mutations enter the population. However, empirical and experimental evidence to date challenges the recent enthusiasm for invoking these models to explain observed patterns of variation in humans and Drosophila.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number5281
JournalNature Communications
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

mutations
Mutation
Genetic Models
Population Genetics
Population
Drosophila

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps. / Jensen, Jeffrey.

In: Nature Communications, Vol. 5, 5281, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{af11c78298de47a2ae746279f3c1ebc3,
title = "On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps",
abstract = "Underlying any understanding of the mode, tempo and relative importance of the adaptive process in the evolution of natural populations is the notion of whether adaptation is mutation limited. Two very different population genetic models have recently been proposed in which the rate of adaptation is not strongly limited by the rate at which newly arising beneficial mutations enter the population. However, empirical and experimental evidence to date challenges the recent enthusiasm for invoking these models to explain observed patterns of variation in humans and Drosophila.",
author = "Jeffrey Jensen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1038/ncomms6281",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Nature Communications",
issn = "2041-1723",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps

AU - Jensen, Jeffrey

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Underlying any understanding of the mode, tempo and relative importance of the adaptive process in the evolution of natural populations is the notion of whether adaptation is mutation limited. Two very different population genetic models have recently been proposed in which the rate of adaptation is not strongly limited by the rate at which newly arising beneficial mutations enter the population. However, empirical and experimental evidence to date challenges the recent enthusiasm for invoking these models to explain observed patterns of variation in humans and Drosophila.

AB - Underlying any understanding of the mode, tempo and relative importance of the adaptive process in the evolution of natural populations is the notion of whether adaptation is mutation limited. Two very different population genetic models have recently been proposed in which the rate of adaptation is not strongly limited by the rate at which newly arising beneficial mutations enter the population. However, empirical and experimental evidence to date challenges the recent enthusiasm for invoking these models to explain observed patterns of variation in humans and Drosophila.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84915790248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84915790248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ncomms6281

DO - 10.1038/ncomms6281

M3 - Review article

VL - 5

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

SN - 2041-1723

M1 - 5281

ER -