TY - JOUR
T1 - On the factor structure of the Rosenberg (1965) general self-esteem scale
AU - Alessandri, Guido
AU - Vecchione, Michele
AU - Eisenberg, Nancy
AU - Łaguna, Mariola
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Since its introduction, the Rosenberg General Self-Esteem Scale (RGSE, Rosenberg, 1965) has been 1 of the most widely used measures of global self-esteem. We conducted 4 studies to investigate (a) the goodness-of-fit of a bifactor model positing a general self-esteem (GSE) factor and 2 specific factors grouping positive (MFP) and negative items (MFN) and (b) different kinds of validity of the GSE, MFN, and MFP factors of the RSGE. In the first study (n = 11,028), the fit of the bifactor model was compared with those of 9 alternative models proposed in literature for the RGSE. In Study 2 (n = 357), the external validities of GSE, MFP, and MFN were evaluated using objective grade point average data and multimethod measures of prosociality, aggression, and depression. In Study 3 (n = 565), the across-rater robustness of the bifactor model was evaluated. In Study 4, measurement invariance of the RGSE was further supported across samples in 3 European countries, Serbia (n = 1,010), Poland (n = 699), and Italy (n = 707), and in the United States (n = 1,192). All in all, psychometric findings corroborate the value and the robustness of the bifactor structure and its substantive interpretation.
AB - Since its introduction, the Rosenberg General Self-Esteem Scale (RGSE, Rosenberg, 1965) has been 1 of the most widely used measures of global self-esteem. We conducted 4 studies to investigate (a) the goodness-of-fit of a bifactor model positing a general self-esteem (GSE) factor and 2 specific factors grouping positive (MFP) and negative items (MFN) and (b) different kinds of validity of the GSE, MFN, and MFP factors of the RSGE. In the first study (n = 11,028), the fit of the bifactor model was compared with those of 9 alternative models proposed in literature for the RGSE. In Study 2 (n = 357), the external validities of GSE, MFP, and MFN were evaluated using objective grade point average data and multimethod measures of prosociality, aggression, and depression. In Study 3 (n = 565), the across-rater robustness of the bifactor model was evaluated. In Study 4, measurement invariance of the RGSE was further supported across samples in 3 European countries, Serbia (n = 1,010), Poland (n = 699), and Italy (n = 707), and in the United States (n = 1,192). All in all, psychometric findings corroborate the value and the robustness of the bifactor structure and its substantive interpretation.
KW - Bifactor model
KW - Method effects
KW - Method factors
KW - Rosenberg self-esteem scale
KW - Self-esteem
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930755288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930755288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/pas0000073
DO - 10.1037/pas0000073
M3 - Article
C2 - 25580614
AN - SCOPUS:84930755288
SN - 1040-3590
VL - 27
SP - 621
EP - 635
JO - Psychological Assessment
JF - Psychological Assessment
IS - 2
ER -