Observations and implications of the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud

Jon A. Holtzman, John S. Gallagher, Andrew A. Cole, Jeremy R. Mould, Carl J. Grillmair, Gilda E. Ballester, Christopher J. Burrows, John T. Clarke, David Crisp, Robin W. Evans, Richard E. Griffiths, J. Jeff Hester, John G. Hoessel, Paul Scowen, Karl R. Stapelfeldt, John T. Trauger, Alan M. Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present derivations of star formation histories based on color-magnitude diagrams of three fields in the LMC from HST/WFPC2 observations. One field is located in the LMC bar and the other two are in the outer disk. We find that a significant component of stars older than 4 Gyr is required to match the observed color-magnitude diagrams. Models with a dispersion-free age-metallicity relation are unable to reproduce the width of the observed main sequence; models with a range of metallicity at a given age provide a much better fit. Such models allow us to construct complete "population boxes" for the LMC based entirely on color-magnitude diagrams; remarkably, these qualitatively reproduce the age-metallicity relation observed in LMC clusters. We discuss some of the uncertainties in deriving star formation histories by our method and suggest that improvements and confidence in the method will be obtained by independent metallicity determinations. We find, independently of the models, that the LMC bar field has a larger relative component of older stars than the outer fields. The main implications suggested by this study are: (1) The star formation history of field stars appears to differ from the age distribution of clusters. (2) There is no obvious evidence for bursty star formation, but our ability to measure bursts shorter in duration than about 25% of any given age is limited by the statistics of the observed number of stars. (3) There may be some correlation of the star formation rate with the last close passage of the LMC/SMC/Milky Way, but there is no dramatic effect. (4) the derived star formation history is probably consistent with observed abundances, based on recent chemical evolution models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2262-2279
Number of pages18
JournalAstronomical Journal
Volume118
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

Magellanic clouds
star formation
histories
metallicity
color-magnitude diagram
history
diagram
stars
star distribution
chemical evolution
star formation rate
age structure
boxes
confidence
bursts
derivation
statistics
method

Keywords

  • Magellanic Clouds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Holtzman, J. A., Gallagher, J. S., Cole, A. A., Mould, J. R., Grillmair, C. J., Ballester, G. E., ... Watson, A. M. (1999). Observations and implications of the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astronomical Journal, 118(5), 2262-2279. https://doi.org/10.1086/301097

Observations and implications of the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud. / Holtzman, Jon A.; Gallagher, John S.; Cole, Andrew A.; Mould, Jeremy R.; Grillmair, Carl J.; Ballester, Gilda E.; Burrows, Christopher J.; Clarke, John T.; Crisp, David; Evans, Robin W.; Griffiths, Richard E.; Hester, J. Jeff; Hoessel, John G.; Scowen, Paul; Stapelfeldt, Karl R.; Trauger, John T.; Watson, Alan M.

In: Astronomical Journal, Vol. 118, No. 5, 01.01.1999, p. 2262-2279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holtzman, JA, Gallagher, JS, Cole, AA, Mould, JR, Grillmair, CJ, Ballester, GE, Burrows, CJ, Clarke, JT, Crisp, D, Evans, RW, Griffiths, RE, Hester, JJ, Hoessel, JG, Scowen, P, Stapelfeldt, KR, Trauger, JT & Watson, AM 1999, 'Observations and implications of the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud', Astronomical Journal, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 2262-2279. https://doi.org/10.1086/301097
Holtzman JA, Gallagher JS, Cole AA, Mould JR, Grillmair CJ, Ballester GE et al. Observations and implications of the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astronomical Journal. 1999 Jan 1;118(5):2262-2279. https://doi.org/10.1086/301097
Holtzman, Jon A. ; Gallagher, John S. ; Cole, Andrew A. ; Mould, Jeremy R. ; Grillmair, Carl J. ; Ballester, Gilda E. ; Burrows, Christopher J. ; Clarke, John T. ; Crisp, David ; Evans, Robin W. ; Griffiths, Richard E. ; Hester, J. Jeff ; Hoessel, John G. ; Scowen, Paul ; Stapelfeldt, Karl R. ; Trauger, John T. ; Watson, Alan M. / Observations and implications of the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud. In: Astronomical Journal. 1999 ; Vol. 118, No. 5. pp. 2262-2279.
@article{d78d9fd37f6e4e3ea157419f109c3fdb,
title = "Observations and implications of the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud",
abstract = "We present derivations of star formation histories based on color-magnitude diagrams of three fields in the LMC from HST/WFPC2 observations. One field is located in the LMC bar and the other two are in the outer disk. We find that a significant component of stars older than 4 Gyr is required to match the observed color-magnitude diagrams. Models with a dispersion-free age-metallicity relation are unable to reproduce the width of the observed main sequence; models with a range of metallicity at a given age provide a much better fit. Such models allow us to construct complete {"}population boxes{"} for the LMC based entirely on color-magnitude diagrams; remarkably, these qualitatively reproduce the age-metallicity relation observed in LMC clusters. We discuss some of the uncertainties in deriving star formation histories by our method and suggest that improvements and confidence in the method will be obtained by independent metallicity determinations. We find, independently of the models, that the LMC bar field has a larger relative component of older stars than the outer fields. The main implications suggested by this study are: (1) The star formation history of field stars appears to differ from the age distribution of clusters. (2) There is no obvious evidence for bursty star formation, but our ability to measure bursts shorter in duration than about 25{\%} of any given age is limited by the statistics of the observed number of stars. (3) There may be some correlation of the star formation rate with the last close passage of the LMC/SMC/Milky Way, but there is no dramatic effect. (4) the derived star formation history is probably consistent with observed abundances, based on recent chemical evolution models.",
keywords = "Magellanic Clouds",
author = "Holtzman, {Jon A.} and Gallagher, {John S.} and Cole, {Andrew A.} and Mould, {Jeremy R.} and Grillmair, {Carl J.} and Ballester, {Gilda E.} and Burrows, {Christopher J.} and Clarke, {John T.} and David Crisp and Evans, {Robin W.} and Griffiths, {Richard E.} and Hester, {J. Jeff} and Hoessel, {John G.} and Paul Scowen and Stapelfeldt, {Karl R.} and Trauger, {John T.} and Watson, {Alan M.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/301097",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "2262--2279",
journal = "Astronomical Journal",
issn = "0004-6256",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observations and implications of the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud

AU - Holtzman, Jon A.

AU - Gallagher, John S.

AU - Cole, Andrew A.

AU - Mould, Jeremy R.

AU - Grillmair, Carl J.

AU - Ballester, Gilda E.

AU - Burrows, Christopher J.

AU - Clarke, John T.

AU - Crisp, David

AU - Evans, Robin W.

AU - Griffiths, Richard E.

AU - Hester, J. Jeff

AU - Hoessel, John G.

AU - Scowen, Paul

AU - Stapelfeldt, Karl R.

AU - Trauger, John T.

AU - Watson, Alan M.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - We present derivations of star formation histories based on color-magnitude diagrams of three fields in the LMC from HST/WFPC2 observations. One field is located in the LMC bar and the other two are in the outer disk. We find that a significant component of stars older than 4 Gyr is required to match the observed color-magnitude diagrams. Models with a dispersion-free age-metallicity relation are unable to reproduce the width of the observed main sequence; models with a range of metallicity at a given age provide a much better fit. Such models allow us to construct complete "population boxes" for the LMC based entirely on color-magnitude diagrams; remarkably, these qualitatively reproduce the age-metallicity relation observed in LMC clusters. We discuss some of the uncertainties in deriving star formation histories by our method and suggest that improvements and confidence in the method will be obtained by independent metallicity determinations. We find, independently of the models, that the LMC bar field has a larger relative component of older stars than the outer fields. The main implications suggested by this study are: (1) The star formation history of field stars appears to differ from the age distribution of clusters. (2) There is no obvious evidence for bursty star formation, but our ability to measure bursts shorter in duration than about 25% of any given age is limited by the statistics of the observed number of stars. (3) There may be some correlation of the star formation rate with the last close passage of the LMC/SMC/Milky Way, but there is no dramatic effect. (4) the derived star formation history is probably consistent with observed abundances, based on recent chemical evolution models.

AB - We present derivations of star formation histories based on color-magnitude diagrams of three fields in the LMC from HST/WFPC2 observations. One field is located in the LMC bar and the other two are in the outer disk. We find that a significant component of stars older than 4 Gyr is required to match the observed color-magnitude diagrams. Models with a dispersion-free age-metallicity relation are unable to reproduce the width of the observed main sequence; models with a range of metallicity at a given age provide a much better fit. Such models allow us to construct complete "population boxes" for the LMC based entirely on color-magnitude diagrams; remarkably, these qualitatively reproduce the age-metallicity relation observed in LMC clusters. We discuss some of the uncertainties in deriving star formation histories by our method and suggest that improvements and confidence in the method will be obtained by independent metallicity determinations. We find, independently of the models, that the LMC bar field has a larger relative component of older stars than the outer fields. The main implications suggested by this study are: (1) The star formation history of field stars appears to differ from the age distribution of clusters. (2) There is no obvious evidence for bursty star formation, but our ability to measure bursts shorter in duration than about 25% of any given age is limited by the statistics of the observed number of stars. (3) There may be some correlation of the star formation rate with the last close passage of the LMC/SMC/Milky Way, but there is no dramatic effect. (4) the derived star formation history is probably consistent with observed abundances, based on recent chemical evolution models.

KW - Magellanic Clouds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039399948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039399948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/301097

DO - 10.1086/301097

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 2262

EP - 2279

JO - Astronomical Journal

JF - Astronomical Journal

SN - 0004-6256

IS - 5

ER -