No evidence of short-term exchange of meat for sex among chimpanzees

Ian Gilby, M. Emery Thompson, Jonathan D. Ruane, Richard Wrangham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The meat-for-sex hypothesis posits that male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) trade meat with estrous females in exchange for short-term mating access. This notion is widely cited in the anthropological literature and has been used to construct scenarios about human evolution. Here we review the theoretical and empirical basis for the meat-for-sex hypothesis. We argue that chimpanzee behavioral ecology does not favor the evolution of such exchanges because 1) female chimpanzees show low mate selectivity and require little or no material incentive to mate, violating existing models of commodity exchange; and 2) meat-for-sex exchanges are unlikely to provide reproductive benefits to either partner. We also present new analyses of 28 years of data from two East African chimpanzee study sites (Gombe National Park, Tanzania; Kanyawara, Kibale National Park, Uganda) and discuss the results of previously published studies. In at least three chimpanzee communities, 1) the presence of sexually receptive females did not increase hunting probability, 2) males did not share preferentially with sexually receptive females, and 3) sharing with females did not increase a male's short-term mating success. We acknowledge that systematic meat sharing by male chimpanzees in expectation of, or in return for, immediate copulations might be discovered in future studies. However, current data indicate that such exchanges are so rare, and so different in nature from exchanges among humans, that with respect to chimpanzees, sexual bartering in humans should be regarded as a derived trait with no known antecedents in the behavior of wild chimpanzees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-53
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Human Evolution
Volume59
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

national park
Pan troglodytes
meat
gender
Uganda
Tanzania
evidence
commodity
ecology
incentive
scenario
human evolution
behavioral ecology
mating success
community
copulation
commodity exchange
national parks
hunting
literature

Keywords

  • Biological markets
  • Food sharing
  • Hunting
  • Mate provisioning
  • Meat eating
  • Reciprocity
  • Tolerated theft

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

No evidence of short-term exchange of meat for sex among chimpanzees. / Gilby, Ian; Emery Thompson, M.; Ruane, Jonathan D.; Wrangham, Richard.

In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 59, No. 1, 07.2010, p. 44-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gilby, Ian ; Emery Thompson, M. ; Ruane, Jonathan D. ; Wrangham, Richard. / No evidence of short-term exchange of meat for sex among chimpanzees. In: Journal of Human Evolution. 2010 ; Vol. 59, No. 1. pp. 44-53.
@article{b5263720cf5c401dab9d42e1743571f0,
title = "No evidence of short-term exchange of meat for sex among chimpanzees",
abstract = "The meat-for-sex hypothesis posits that male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) trade meat with estrous females in exchange for short-term mating access. This notion is widely cited in the anthropological literature and has been used to construct scenarios about human evolution. Here we review the theoretical and empirical basis for the meat-for-sex hypothesis. We argue that chimpanzee behavioral ecology does not favor the evolution of such exchanges because 1) female chimpanzees show low mate selectivity and require little or no material incentive to mate, violating existing models of commodity exchange; and 2) meat-for-sex exchanges are unlikely to provide reproductive benefits to either partner. We also present new analyses of 28 years of data from two East African chimpanzee study sites (Gombe National Park, Tanzania; Kanyawara, Kibale National Park, Uganda) and discuss the results of previously published studies. In at least three chimpanzee communities, 1) the presence of sexually receptive females did not increase hunting probability, 2) males did not share preferentially with sexually receptive females, and 3) sharing with females did not increase a male's short-term mating success. We acknowledge that systematic meat sharing by male chimpanzees in expectation of, or in return for, immediate copulations might be discovered in future studies. However, current data indicate that such exchanges are so rare, and so different in nature from exchanges among humans, that with respect to chimpanzees, sexual bartering in humans should be regarded as a derived trait with no known antecedents in the behavior of wild chimpanzees.",
keywords = "Biological markets, Food sharing, Hunting, Mate provisioning, Meat eating, Reciprocity, Tolerated theft",
author = "Ian Gilby and {Emery Thompson}, M. and Ruane, {Jonathan D.} and Richard Wrangham",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "44--53",
journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",
issn = "0047-2484",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - No evidence of short-term exchange of meat for sex among chimpanzees

AU - Gilby, Ian

AU - Emery Thompson, M.

AU - Ruane, Jonathan D.

AU - Wrangham, Richard

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - The meat-for-sex hypothesis posits that male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) trade meat with estrous females in exchange for short-term mating access. This notion is widely cited in the anthropological literature and has been used to construct scenarios about human evolution. Here we review the theoretical and empirical basis for the meat-for-sex hypothesis. We argue that chimpanzee behavioral ecology does not favor the evolution of such exchanges because 1) female chimpanzees show low mate selectivity and require little or no material incentive to mate, violating existing models of commodity exchange; and 2) meat-for-sex exchanges are unlikely to provide reproductive benefits to either partner. We also present new analyses of 28 years of data from two East African chimpanzee study sites (Gombe National Park, Tanzania; Kanyawara, Kibale National Park, Uganda) and discuss the results of previously published studies. In at least three chimpanzee communities, 1) the presence of sexually receptive females did not increase hunting probability, 2) males did not share preferentially with sexually receptive females, and 3) sharing with females did not increase a male's short-term mating success. We acknowledge that systematic meat sharing by male chimpanzees in expectation of, or in return for, immediate copulations might be discovered in future studies. However, current data indicate that such exchanges are so rare, and so different in nature from exchanges among humans, that with respect to chimpanzees, sexual bartering in humans should be regarded as a derived trait with no known antecedents in the behavior of wild chimpanzees.

AB - The meat-for-sex hypothesis posits that male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) trade meat with estrous females in exchange for short-term mating access. This notion is widely cited in the anthropological literature and has been used to construct scenarios about human evolution. Here we review the theoretical and empirical basis for the meat-for-sex hypothesis. We argue that chimpanzee behavioral ecology does not favor the evolution of such exchanges because 1) female chimpanzees show low mate selectivity and require little or no material incentive to mate, violating existing models of commodity exchange; and 2) meat-for-sex exchanges are unlikely to provide reproductive benefits to either partner. We also present new analyses of 28 years of data from two East African chimpanzee study sites (Gombe National Park, Tanzania; Kanyawara, Kibale National Park, Uganda) and discuss the results of previously published studies. In at least three chimpanzee communities, 1) the presence of sexually receptive females did not increase hunting probability, 2) males did not share preferentially with sexually receptive females, and 3) sharing with females did not increase a male's short-term mating success. We acknowledge that systematic meat sharing by male chimpanzees in expectation of, or in return for, immediate copulations might be discovered in future studies. However, current data indicate that such exchanges are so rare, and so different in nature from exchanges among humans, that with respect to chimpanzees, sexual bartering in humans should be regarded as a derived trait with no known antecedents in the behavior of wild chimpanzees.

KW - Biological markets

KW - Food sharing

KW - Hunting

KW - Mate provisioning

KW - Meat eating

KW - Reciprocity

KW - Tolerated theft

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954212781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954212781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.02.006

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 44

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Human Evolution

JF - Journal of Human Evolution

SN - 0047-2484

IS - 1

ER -