Nesselroade and Molenaar's Measurement Concerns and Proposals: An Introduction

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

In this special section Nesselroade and Molenaar (N & M) propose a provocative new approach to measurement invariance. When measures are collected repeatedly over time (e.g., daily diary studies), a potentially unique measurement model relating the items to the underlying construct can be created for each individual. If hypothesized causal paths specified between constructs (e.g., frustration → aggression) can be constrained to be equal across the individuals, a model with idiographic measurement of the constructs, but with nomothetic structural relationships can be specified. Three commentaries react to N & M's proposal. Revelle and Wilt challenge the priority given by N & M to unique individual measurement structures, arguing that between subjects differences in structural relationships are empirically important and meaningful. Markus's uses David Hume's framework to raise philosophy of science challenges for N & M's approach. Maydeu-Olivares challenges the incremental validity of N & M's approach, arguing that N & M's approach is unlikely to improve the prediction of between subjects criteria. Finally, N & M present a rejoinder to the three commentaries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)392-395
Number of pages4
JournalMultivariate Behavioral Research
Volume51
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 3 2016

Fingerprint

Frustration
Aggression
Measurement Invariance
Philosophy of Science
Path
Prediction
Model
Relationships

Keywords

  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • idiographic
  • Measurement
  • measurement invariance
  • nomothetic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Nesselroade and Molenaar's Measurement Concerns and Proposals : An Introduction. / West, Stephen.

In: Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 51, No. 2-3, 03.05.2016, p. 392-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

@article{53e7ef4614d84752bb42197d7d5916c1,
title = "Nesselroade and Molenaar's Measurement Concerns and Proposals: An Introduction",
abstract = "In this special section Nesselroade and Molenaar (N & M) propose a provocative new approach to measurement invariance. When measures are collected repeatedly over time (e.g., daily diary studies), a potentially unique measurement model relating the items to the underlying construct can be created for each individual. If hypothesized causal paths specified between constructs (e.g., frustration → aggression) can be constrained to be equal across the individuals, a model with idiographic measurement of the constructs, but with nomothetic structural relationships can be specified. Three commentaries react to N & M's proposal. Revelle and Wilt challenge the priority given by N & M to unique individual measurement structures, arguing that between subjects differences in structural relationships are empirically important and meaningful. Markus's uses David Hume's framework to raise philosophy of science challenges for N & M's approach. Maydeu-Olivares challenges the incremental validity of N & M's approach, arguing that N & M's approach is unlikely to improve the prediction of between subjects criteria. Finally, N & M present a rejoinder to the three commentaries.",
keywords = "confirmatory factor analysis, idiographic, Measurement, measurement invariance, nomothetic",
author = "Stephen West",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00273171.2016.1195669",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "392--395",
journal = "Multivariate Behavioral Research",
issn = "0027-3171",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nesselroade and Molenaar's Measurement Concerns and Proposals

T2 - An Introduction

AU - West, Stephen

PY - 2016/5/3

Y1 - 2016/5/3

N2 - In this special section Nesselroade and Molenaar (N & M) propose a provocative new approach to measurement invariance. When measures are collected repeatedly over time (e.g., daily diary studies), a potentially unique measurement model relating the items to the underlying construct can be created for each individual. If hypothesized causal paths specified between constructs (e.g., frustration → aggression) can be constrained to be equal across the individuals, a model with idiographic measurement of the constructs, but with nomothetic structural relationships can be specified. Three commentaries react to N & M's proposal. Revelle and Wilt challenge the priority given by N & M to unique individual measurement structures, arguing that between subjects differences in structural relationships are empirically important and meaningful. Markus's uses David Hume's framework to raise philosophy of science challenges for N & M's approach. Maydeu-Olivares challenges the incremental validity of N & M's approach, arguing that N & M's approach is unlikely to improve the prediction of between subjects criteria. Finally, N & M present a rejoinder to the three commentaries.

AB - In this special section Nesselroade and Molenaar (N & M) propose a provocative new approach to measurement invariance. When measures are collected repeatedly over time (e.g., daily diary studies), a potentially unique measurement model relating the items to the underlying construct can be created for each individual. If hypothesized causal paths specified between constructs (e.g., frustration → aggression) can be constrained to be equal across the individuals, a model with idiographic measurement of the constructs, but with nomothetic structural relationships can be specified. Three commentaries react to N & M's proposal. Revelle and Wilt challenge the priority given by N & M to unique individual measurement structures, arguing that between subjects differences in structural relationships are empirically important and meaningful. Markus's uses David Hume's framework to raise philosophy of science challenges for N & M's approach. Maydeu-Olivares challenges the incremental validity of N & M's approach, arguing that N & M's approach is unlikely to improve the prediction of between subjects criteria. Finally, N & M present a rejoinder to the three commentaries.

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - idiographic

KW - Measurement

KW - measurement invariance

KW - nomothetic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978036647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978036647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00273171.2016.1195669

DO - 10.1080/00273171.2016.1195669

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 27391256

AN - SCOPUS:84978036647

VL - 51

SP - 392

EP - 395

JO - Multivariate Behavioral Research

JF - Multivariate Behavioral Research

SN - 0027-3171

IS - 2-3

ER -