Moving forward with the concept of responsible leadership: Three caveats to guide theory and research

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The concept of responsible leadership has garnered increased attention in recent years. Indeed, irresponsibility on the part of organizational leaders appears to represent an area of growing concern to the greater public. Accordingly, it is appropriate that increased scholarly attention be devoted to an understanding of this concept. But with that said, the purpose of this article is to identify three caveats about which researchers and practitioners should be concerned as work in this area proceeds. These caveats pertain to: (1) definitional issues, (2) the importance of theory and research that is not ideologically driven or biased, and (3) the positioning of responsible leadership within the greater body of leadership theory and research. Additional concerns are considered including the measurement of responsible leadership and research strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationResponsible Leadership
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Pages75-83
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)9789400739956, 9789400739949
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Research Strategy
Positioning

Keywords

  • Leadership
  • Social responsibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Moving forward with the concept of responsible leadership : Three caveats to guide theory and research. / Waldman, David.

Responsible Leadership. Springer Netherlands, 2012. p. 75-83.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

@inbook{5067436b02bc4ab88902f46e630bdcc7,
title = "Moving forward with the concept of responsible leadership: Three caveats to guide theory and research",
abstract = "The concept of responsible leadership has garnered increased attention in recent years. Indeed, irresponsibility on the part of organizational leaders appears to represent an area of growing concern to the greater public. Accordingly, it is appropriate that increased scholarly attention be devoted to an understanding of this concept. But with that said, the purpose of this article is to identify three caveats about which researchers and practitioners should be concerned as work in this area proceeds. These caveats pertain to: (1) definitional issues, (2) the importance of theory and research that is not ideologically driven or biased, and (3) the positioning of responsible leadership within the greater body of leadership theory and research. Additional concerns are considered including the measurement of responsible leadership and research strategies.",
keywords = "Leadership, Social responsibility",
author = "David Waldman",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-011-1021-8",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9789400739956",
pages = "75--83",
booktitle = "Responsible Leadership",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Moving forward with the concept of responsible leadership

T2 - Three caveats to guide theory and research

AU - Waldman, David

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - The concept of responsible leadership has garnered increased attention in recent years. Indeed, irresponsibility on the part of organizational leaders appears to represent an area of growing concern to the greater public. Accordingly, it is appropriate that increased scholarly attention be devoted to an understanding of this concept. But with that said, the purpose of this article is to identify three caveats about which researchers and practitioners should be concerned as work in this area proceeds. These caveats pertain to: (1) definitional issues, (2) the importance of theory and research that is not ideologically driven or biased, and (3) the positioning of responsible leadership within the greater body of leadership theory and research. Additional concerns are considered including the measurement of responsible leadership and research strategies.

AB - The concept of responsible leadership has garnered increased attention in recent years. Indeed, irresponsibility on the part of organizational leaders appears to represent an area of growing concern to the greater public. Accordingly, it is appropriate that increased scholarly attention be devoted to an understanding of this concept. But with that said, the purpose of this article is to identify three caveats about which researchers and practitioners should be concerned as work in this area proceeds. These caveats pertain to: (1) definitional issues, (2) the importance of theory and research that is not ideologically driven or biased, and (3) the positioning of responsible leadership within the greater body of leadership theory and research. Additional concerns are considered including the measurement of responsible leadership and research strategies.

KW - Leadership

KW - Social responsibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956833562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956833562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-011-1021-8

DO - 10.1007/s10551-011-1021-8

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84956833562

SN - 9789400739956

SN - 9789400739949

SP - 75

EP - 83

BT - Responsible Leadership

PB - Springer Netherlands

ER -