Moral intuitions and smart growth: Why do liberals and conservatives view compact development so differently?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Political liberals are significantly more supportive than conservatives of walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods, transit-oriented development, and other aspects of the "compact city," not just in their views about government policy toward metropolitan development but also in their consumption preferences regarding neighborhoods. I argue that social psychologists' theory of moral intuitionism helps account for these differences. In this view, liberals and conservatives emphasize different sets of affective, emotion-laden moral impulses-such as those involving fairness, purity, or ingroup loyalty-predisposing them toward particular reactions to compact development. Political ideologies also are associated with different personality traits that are relevant to opinions on the built environment. To explore the intuitionist hypothesis, I review qualitative accounts that suggest an association between certain moral worldviews and attitudes toward development patterns. I then conduct multivariate analysis of a public opinion survey that contained questions relevant to moral foundations and to views on compact development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-108
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Urban Affairs
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

intuition
political ideology
social theory
multivariate analysis
worldview
personality traits
loyalty
psychologist
fairness
government policy
public opinion
emotion
development pattern
WorldView
built environment
opinion
opinion survey
consumption
city

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Moral intuitions and smart growth : Why do liberals and conservatives view compact development so differently? / Lewis, Paul.

In: Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.05.2015, p. 87-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84d8c7cc3d77422ba2b9ce1d0212ab7a,
title = "Moral intuitions and smart growth: Why do liberals and conservatives view compact development so differently?",
abstract = "Political liberals are significantly more supportive than conservatives of walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods, transit-oriented development, and other aspects of the {"}compact city,{"} not just in their views about government policy toward metropolitan development but also in their consumption preferences regarding neighborhoods. I argue that social psychologists' theory of moral intuitionism helps account for these differences. In this view, liberals and conservatives emphasize different sets of affective, emotion-laden moral impulses-such as those involving fairness, purity, or ingroup loyalty-predisposing them toward particular reactions to compact development. Political ideologies also are associated with different personality traits that are relevant to opinions on the built environment. To explore the intuitionist hypothesis, I review qualitative accounts that suggest an association between certain moral worldviews and attitudes toward development patterns. I then conduct multivariate analysis of a public opinion survey that contained questions relevant to moral foundations and to views on compact development.",
author = "Paul Lewis",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/juaf.12172",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "87--108",
journal = "Journal of Urban Affairs",
issn = "0735-2166",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral intuitions and smart growth

T2 - Why do liberals and conservatives view compact development so differently?

AU - Lewis, Paul

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Political liberals are significantly more supportive than conservatives of walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods, transit-oriented development, and other aspects of the "compact city," not just in their views about government policy toward metropolitan development but also in their consumption preferences regarding neighborhoods. I argue that social psychologists' theory of moral intuitionism helps account for these differences. In this view, liberals and conservatives emphasize different sets of affective, emotion-laden moral impulses-such as those involving fairness, purity, or ingroup loyalty-predisposing them toward particular reactions to compact development. Political ideologies also are associated with different personality traits that are relevant to opinions on the built environment. To explore the intuitionist hypothesis, I review qualitative accounts that suggest an association between certain moral worldviews and attitudes toward development patterns. I then conduct multivariate analysis of a public opinion survey that contained questions relevant to moral foundations and to views on compact development.

AB - Political liberals are significantly more supportive than conservatives of walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods, transit-oriented development, and other aspects of the "compact city," not just in their views about government policy toward metropolitan development but also in their consumption preferences regarding neighborhoods. I argue that social psychologists' theory of moral intuitionism helps account for these differences. In this view, liberals and conservatives emphasize different sets of affective, emotion-laden moral impulses-such as those involving fairness, purity, or ingroup loyalty-predisposing them toward particular reactions to compact development. Political ideologies also are associated with different personality traits that are relevant to opinions on the built environment. To explore the intuitionist hypothesis, I review qualitative accounts that suggest an association between certain moral worldviews and attitudes toward development patterns. I then conduct multivariate analysis of a public opinion survey that contained questions relevant to moral foundations and to views on compact development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928215904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928215904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/juaf.12172

DO - 10.1111/juaf.12172

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928215904

VL - 37

SP - 87

EP - 108

JO - Journal of Urban Affairs

JF - Journal of Urban Affairs

SN - 0735-2166

IS - 2

ER -