Modification of illite-muscovite crystallite-size distributions by sample preparation for powder XRD analysis

Gejing Li, Donald R. Peacor, P R Buseck, Péter Árkai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mean crystallite sizes of illite-muscovite have been obtained by direct measurements using TEM on ion-milled (original rock) samples and separates prepared for XRD analysis, and by XRD profile analysis of separates in a prograde sequence of metapelites from southern New Zealand. The mean crystallite sizes determined by the analyses of XRD peak profiles increase with metamorphic grade, consistent with the trend determined by TEM from ion-milled rock samples. However, the sizes obtained by TEM on the ion-milled rock samples are approximately two to four times larger than those by XRD profile analyses. This difference is greater in higher-grade than lower-grade samples. The mean sizes of crystallites measured using TEM on the separates that were used to obtain XRD profiles correspond well to those from XRD profile analyses. Further TEM and AFM observations of separates show that crystals have been broken across and cleaved along (001) planes. These relations indicate that the XRD data were obtained from samples that differ significantly from the original rock samples; the data indicate that sample preparation for XRD analysis significantly altered the original size-distributions. Crystallite-size distributions are poor approximations to lognormal in original rocks, but are modified to lognormal or nearly lognormal distributions in separates. Interpretation of growth conditions from size distributions of separates is therefore subject to error. Only size distributions of unseparated samples, or separates where the effects of the separation process are known, should be used as indicators of growth conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1435-1451
Number of pages17
JournalCanadian Mineralogist
Volume36
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1998

Fingerprint

sample preparation
Crystallite size
muscovite
illite
Powders
X-ray diffraction
Rocks
Transmission electron microscopy
transmission electron microscopy
Ions
rock
ion
Crystallites
analysis
metapelite
Crystals
crystal

Keywords

  • Anchizone
  • Crystallite size
  • Diagenesis
  • Epizone
  • Illite-muscovite
  • Low-grade metamorphism
  • New Zealand
  • Size distribution
  • TEM measurement
  • XRD analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Modification of illite-muscovite crystallite-size distributions by sample preparation for powder XRD analysis. / Li, Gejing; Peacor, Donald R.; Buseck, P R; Árkai, Péter.

In: Canadian Mineralogist, Vol. 36, No. 6, 12.1998, p. 1435-1451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Gejing ; Peacor, Donald R. ; Buseck, P R ; Árkai, Péter. / Modification of illite-muscovite crystallite-size distributions by sample preparation for powder XRD analysis. In: Canadian Mineralogist. 1998 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 1435-1451.
@article{a9b8e97e04cd47c6bcd992368cb4ffd2,
title = "Modification of illite-muscovite crystallite-size distributions by sample preparation for powder XRD analysis",
abstract = "Mean crystallite sizes of illite-muscovite have been obtained by direct measurements using TEM on ion-milled (original rock) samples and separates prepared for XRD analysis, and by XRD profile analysis of separates in a prograde sequence of metapelites from southern New Zealand. The mean crystallite sizes determined by the analyses of XRD peak profiles increase with metamorphic grade, consistent with the trend determined by TEM from ion-milled rock samples. However, the sizes obtained by TEM on the ion-milled rock samples are approximately two to four times larger than those by XRD profile analyses. This difference is greater in higher-grade than lower-grade samples. The mean sizes of crystallites measured using TEM on the separates that were used to obtain XRD profiles correspond well to those from XRD profile analyses. Further TEM and AFM observations of separates show that crystals have been broken across and cleaved along (001) planes. These relations indicate that the XRD data were obtained from samples that differ significantly from the original rock samples; the data indicate that sample preparation for XRD analysis significantly altered the original size-distributions. Crystallite-size distributions are poor approximations to lognormal in original rocks, but are modified to lognormal or nearly lognormal distributions in separates. Interpretation of growth conditions from size distributions of separates is therefore subject to error. Only size distributions of unseparated samples, or separates where the effects of the separation process are known, should be used as indicators of growth conditions.",
keywords = "Anchizone, Crystallite size, Diagenesis, Epizone, Illite-muscovite, Low-grade metamorphism, New Zealand, Size distribution, TEM measurement, XRD analysis",
author = "Gejing Li and Peacor, {Donald R.} and Buseck, {P R} and P{\'e}ter {\'A}rkai",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1435--1451",
journal = "Canadian Mineralogist",
issn = "0008-4476",
publisher = "Mineralogical Association of Canada",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modification of illite-muscovite crystallite-size distributions by sample preparation for powder XRD analysis

AU - Li, Gejing

AU - Peacor, Donald R.

AU - Buseck, P R

AU - Árkai, Péter

PY - 1998/12

Y1 - 1998/12

N2 - Mean crystallite sizes of illite-muscovite have been obtained by direct measurements using TEM on ion-milled (original rock) samples and separates prepared for XRD analysis, and by XRD profile analysis of separates in a prograde sequence of metapelites from southern New Zealand. The mean crystallite sizes determined by the analyses of XRD peak profiles increase with metamorphic grade, consistent with the trend determined by TEM from ion-milled rock samples. However, the sizes obtained by TEM on the ion-milled rock samples are approximately two to four times larger than those by XRD profile analyses. This difference is greater in higher-grade than lower-grade samples. The mean sizes of crystallites measured using TEM on the separates that were used to obtain XRD profiles correspond well to those from XRD profile analyses. Further TEM and AFM observations of separates show that crystals have been broken across and cleaved along (001) planes. These relations indicate that the XRD data were obtained from samples that differ significantly from the original rock samples; the data indicate that sample preparation for XRD analysis significantly altered the original size-distributions. Crystallite-size distributions are poor approximations to lognormal in original rocks, but are modified to lognormal or nearly lognormal distributions in separates. Interpretation of growth conditions from size distributions of separates is therefore subject to error. Only size distributions of unseparated samples, or separates where the effects of the separation process are known, should be used as indicators of growth conditions.

AB - Mean crystallite sizes of illite-muscovite have been obtained by direct measurements using TEM on ion-milled (original rock) samples and separates prepared for XRD analysis, and by XRD profile analysis of separates in a prograde sequence of metapelites from southern New Zealand. The mean crystallite sizes determined by the analyses of XRD peak profiles increase with metamorphic grade, consistent with the trend determined by TEM from ion-milled rock samples. However, the sizes obtained by TEM on the ion-milled rock samples are approximately two to four times larger than those by XRD profile analyses. This difference is greater in higher-grade than lower-grade samples. The mean sizes of crystallites measured using TEM on the separates that were used to obtain XRD profiles correspond well to those from XRD profile analyses. Further TEM and AFM observations of separates show that crystals have been broken across and cleaved along (001) planes. These relations indicate that the XRD data were obtained from samples that differ significantly from the original rock samples; the data indicate that sample preparation for XRD analysis significantly altered the original size-distributions. Crystallite-size distributions are poor approximations to lognormal in original rocks, but are modified to lognormal or nearly lognormal distributions in separates. Interpretation of growth conditions from size distributions of separates is therefore subject to error. Only size distributions of unseparated samples, or separates where the effects of the separation process are known, should be used as indicators of growth conditions.

KW - Anchizone

KW - Crystallite size

KW - Diagenesis

KW - Epizone

KW - Illite-muscovite

KW - Low-grade metamorphism

KW - New Zealand

KW - Size distribution

KW - TEM measurement

KW - XRD analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13044270148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13044270148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:13044270148

VL - 36

SP - 1435

EP - 1451

JO - Canadian Mineralogist

JF - Canadian Mineralogist

SN - 0008-4476

IS - 6

ER -