TY - JOUR
T1 - Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system
AU - Robinson, Derek T.
AU - Di Vittorio, Alan
AU - Alexander, Peter
AU - Arneth, Almut
AU - Barton, C Michael
AU - Brown, Daniel G.
AU - Kettner, Albert
AU - Lemmen, Carsten
AU - O'Neill, Brian C.
AU - Janssen, Marcus
AU - Pugh, Thomas A.M.
AU - Rabin, Sam S.
AU - Rounsevell, Mark
AU - Syvitski, James P.
AU - Ullah, Isaac
AU - Verburg, Peter H.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements. This research has been made possible for the authors from a variety of supporting institutions, which we thank and acknowledge in what follows. Derek T. Robinson was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council (NSERC) of Canada as part of their Discovery Grant program. Alan Di Vittorio was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Climate and Environmental Sciences Division, Integrated Assessment Program, under Award Number DE-AC02-05CH11231. Peter Alexander, Thomas A. M. Pugh, and Mark Rounsevell were supported by the Future Earth AIMES project, CSDMS, and the European Commission LUC4C project. Almut Arneth, Sam S. Rabin, and Mark Rounsevell also acknowledge LUC4C (grant no. 603542) and the Helmholtz association through its ATMO programme and its Integration and Networking fund. Thomas A. M. Pugh was supported by the University of Birmingham, the Birmingham Institute of Forest Research (BIFoR paper no. 30). C. Michael Barton and Isaac Ullah were supported by the US National Science Foundation (grants BCS-410269, DEB-1313727, and GEO-909394), and the support from Arizona State University and the Universitat de Valencia, Spain. Many other people in Jordan, Spain, and the US contributed in various ways to the MedLanD project, and we want to extend our thanks to them also. Albert Kettner and James P. Syvitski were supported by the CSDMS project, funded by The US National Science Foundation (grant 0621695). Carsten Lemmen was supported by the MOSSCO project funded by the German Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF) under grant agreements 03F0667A. Brian C. O’Neill’s contribution was based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number AGS- 1243095. Peter H. Verburg was supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme ERC grant agreement no. 311819 – GLOLAND.
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2018/6/26
Y1 - 2018/6/26
N2 - The unprecedented use of Earth's resources by humans, in combination with increasing natural variability in natural processes over the past century, is affecting the evolution of the Earth system. To better understand natural processes and their potential future trajectories requires improved integration with and quantification of human processes. Similarly, to mitigate risk and facilitate socio-economic development requires a better understanding of how the natural system (e.g. climate variability and change, extreme weather events, and processes affecting soil fertility) affects human processes. Our understanding of these interactions and feedback between human and natural systems has been formalized through a variety of modelling approaches. However, a common conceptual framework or set of guidelines to model human-natural-system feedbacks is lacking. The presented research lays out a conceptual framework that includes representing model coupling configuration in combination with the frequency of interaction and coordination of communication between coupled models. Four different approaches used to couple representations of the human and natural system are presented in relation to this framework, which vary in the processes represented and in the scale of their application. From the development and experience associated with the four models of coupled human-natural systems, the following eight lessons were identified that if taken into account by future coupled human-natural-systems model developments may increase their success: (1) leverage the power of sensitivity analysis with models, (2) remember modelling is an iterative process, (3) create a common language, (4) make code open-access, (5) ensure consistency, (6) reconcile spatio-temporal mismatch, (7) construct homogeneous units, and (8) incorporating feedback increases non-linearity and variability. Following a discussion of feedbacks, a way forward to expedite model coupling and increase the longevity and interoperability of models is given, which suggests the use of a wrapper container software, a standardized applications programming interface (API), the incorporation of standard names, the mitigation of sunk costs by creating interfaces to multiple coupling frameworks, and the adoption of reproducible workflow environments to wire the pieces together.
AB - The unprecedented use of Earth's resources by humans, in combination with increasing natural variability in natural processes over the past century, is affecting the evolution of the Earth system. To better understand natural processes and their potential future trajectories requires improved integration with and quantification of human processes. Similarly, to mitigate risk and facilitate socio-economic development requires a better understanding of how the natural system (e.g. climate variability and change, extreme weather events, and processes affecting soil fertility) affects human processes. Our understanding of these interactions and feedback between human and natural systems has been formalized through a variety of modelling approaches. However, a common conceptual framework or set of guidelines to model human-natural-system feedbacks is lacking. The presented research lays out a conceptual framework that includes representing model coupling configuration in combination with the frequency of interaction and coordination of communication between coupled models. Four different approaches used to couple representations of the human and natural system are presented in relation to this framework, which vary in the processes represented and in the scale of their application. From the development and experience associated with the four models of coupled human-natural systems, the following eight lessons were identified that if taken into account by future coupled human-natural-systems model developments may increase their success: (1) leverage the power of sensitivity analysis with models, (2) remember modelling is an iterative process, (3) create a common language, (4) make code open-access, (5) ensure consistency, (6) reconcile spatio-temporal mismatch, (7) construct homogeneous units, and (8) incorporating feedback increases non-linearity and variability. Following a discussion of feedbacks, a way forward to expedite model coupling and increase the longevity and interoperability of models is given, which suggests the use of a wrapper container software, a standardized applications programming interface (API), the incorporation of standard names, the mitigation of sunk costs by creating interfaces to multiple coupling frameworks, and the adoption of reproducible workflow environments to wire the pieces together.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049144201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049144201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/esd-9-895-2018
DO - 10.5194/esd-9-895-2018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049144201
SN - 2190-4979
VL - 9
SP - 895
EP - 914
JO - Earth System Dynamics
JF - Earth System Dynamics
IS - 2
ER -