Missing data in educational research

A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement

James L. Peugh, Craig K. Enders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

456 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Missing data analyses have received considerable recent attention in the methodological literature, and two "modern" methods, multiple imputation and maximum likelihood estimation, are recommended. The goals of this article are to (a) provide an overview of missing-data theory, maximum likelihood estimation, and multiple imputation; (b) conduct a methodological review of missing-data reporting practices in 23 applied research journals; and (c) provide a demonstration of multiple imputation and maximum likelihood estimation using the Longitudinal Study of American Youth data. The results indicated that explicit discussions of missing data increased substantially between 1999 and 2003, but the use of maximum likelihood estimation or multiple imputation was rare; the studies relied almost exclusively on listwise and pairwise deletion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)525-556
Number of pages32
JournalReview of Educational Research
Volume74
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

educational research
longitudinal study

Keywords

  • EM algorithm
  • Maximum likelihood estimation
  • Missing data
  • Multiple imputation
  • NORM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Missing data in educational research : A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. / Peugh, James L.; Enders, Craig K.

In: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 74, No. 4, 12.2004, p. 525-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b8c93e86ca78445fb51d20399cfb0321,
title = "Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement",
abstract = "Missing data analyses have received considerable recent attention in the methodological literature, and two {"}modern{"} methods, multiple imputation and maximum likelihood estimation, are recommended. The goals of this article are to (a) provide an overview of missing-data theory, maximum likelihood estimation, and multiple imputation; (b) conduct a methodological review of missing-data reporting practices in 23 applied research journals; and (c) provide a demonstration of multiple imputation and maximum likelihood estimation using the Longitudinal Study of American Youth data. The results indicated that explicit discussions of missing data increased substantially between 1999 and 2003, but the use of maximum likelihood estimation or multiple imputation was rare; the studies relied almost exclusively on listwise and pairwise deletion.",
keywords = "EM algorithm, Maximum likelihood estimation, Missing data, Multiple imputation, NORM",
author = "Peugh, {James L.} and Enders, {Craig K.}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "525--556",
journal = "Review of Educational Research",
issn = "0034-6543",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing data in educational research

T2 - A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement

AU - Peugh, James L.

AU - Enders, Craig K.

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - Missing data analyses have received considerable recent attention in the methodological literature, and two "modern" methods, multiple imputation and maximum likelihood estimation, are recommended. The goals of this article are to (a) provide an overview of missing-data theory, maximum likelihood estimation, and multiple imputation; (b) conduct a methodological review of missing-data reporting practices in 23 applied research journals; and (c) provide a demonstration of multiple imputation and maximum likelihood estimation using the Longitudinal Study of American Youth data. The results indicated that explicit discussions of missing data increased substantially between 1999 and 2003, but the use of maximum likelihood estimation or multiple imputation was rare; the studies relied almost exclusively on listwise and pairwise deletion.

AB - Missing data analyses have received considerable recent attention in the methodological literature, and two "modern" methods, multiple imputation and maximum likelihood estimation, are recommended. The goals of this article are to (a) provide an overview of missing-data theory, maximum likelihood estimation, and multiple imputation; (b) conduct a methodological review of missing-data reporting practices in 23 applied research journals; and (c) provide a demonstration of multiple imputation and maximum likelihood estimation using the Longitudinal Study of American Youth data. The results indicated that explicit discussions of missing data increased substantially between 1999 and 2003, but the use of maximum likelihood estimation or multiple imputation was rare; the studies relied almost exclusively on listwise and pairwise deletion.

KW - EM algorithm

KW - Maximum likelihood estimation

KW - Missing data

KW - Multiple imputation

KW - NORM

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12744272198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12744272198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 525

EP - 556

JO - Review of Educational Research

JF - Review of Educational Research

SN - 0034-6543

IS - 4

ER -