Milton among the pragmatists

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Appropriating Milton as an exponent of a distinctively American way of thinking has become something of an American tradition. Milton has been invoked in religion, politics, and most recently in philosophy, specifically as an advocate of American pragmatism and its postmodern descendant, the neo-pragmatism routinely associated with Stanley Fish in the 1980s and 1990s. For Fish, the appeal of pragmatism lies in the intellectual freedom afforded by its anti-essentialist implications. The problem is, however, that in his endless appetite for indeterminacy, Fish tends to de-historicize Milton's logocentrism and do violence to his belief in an objective, knowable truth. Ironically, a clear understanding of Milton's historical otherness makes it possible to turn the tables and articulate serious doubts about the disinterestedness of pragmatism and the achievements of American liberalism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)923-939
Number of pages17
JournalUniversity of Toronto Quarterly
Volume77
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Pragmatism
Pragmatist
Fish
Descendant
Essentialist
Religion
1990s
Indeterminacy
Otherness
Liberalism
Logocentrism
Disinterestedness
Appetite
Neopragmatism
American Tradition
Philosophy
1980s

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Milton among the pragmatists. / Hawkes, David.

In: University of Toronto Quarterly, Vol. 77, No. 3, 2008, p. 923-939.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5edab0a3b41c484da6a5aabf196d4d3f,
title = "Milton among the pragmatists",
abstract = "Appropriating Milton as an exponent of a distinctively American way of thinking has become something of an American tradition. Milton has been invoked in religion, politics, and most recently in philosophy, specifically as an advocate of American pragmatism and its postmodern descendant, the neo-pragmatism routinely associated with Stanley Fish in the 1980s and 1990s. For Fish, the appeal of pragmatism lies in the intellectual freedom afforded by its anti-essentialist implications. The problem is, however, that in his endless appetite for indeterminacy, Fish tends to de-historicize Milton's logocentrism and do violence to his belief in an objective, knowable truth. Ironically, a clear understanding of Milton's historical otherness makes it possible to turn the tables and articulate serious doubts about the disinterestedness of pragmatism and the achievements of American liberalism.",
author = "David Hawkes",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.3138/UTQ.77.3.923",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "923--939",
journal = "University of Toronto Quarterly",
issn = "0042-0247",
publisher = "University of Toronto Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Milton among the pragmatists

AU - Hawkes, David

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Appropriating Milton as an exponent of a distinctively American way of thinking has become something of an American tradition. Milton has been invoked in religion, politics, and most recently in philosophy, specifically as an advocate of American pragmatism and its postmodern descendant, the neo-pragmatism routinely associated with Stanley Fish in the 1980s and 1990s. For Fish, the appeal of pragmatism lies in the intellectual freedom afforded by its anti-essentialist implications. The problem is, however, that in his endless appetite for indeterminacy, Fish tends to de-historicize Milton's logocentrism and do violence to his belief in an objective, knowable truth. Ironically, a clear understanding of Milton's historical otherness makes it possible to turn the tables and articulate serious doubts about the disinterestedness of pragmatism and the achievements of American liberalism.

AB - Appropriating Milton as an exponent of a distinctively American way of thinking has become something of an American tradition. Milton has been invoked in religion, politics, and most recently in philosophy, specifically as an advocate of American pragmatism and its postmodern descendant, the neo-pragmatism routinely associated with Stanley Fish in the 1980s and 1990s. For Fish, the appeal of pragmatism lies in the intellectual freedom afforded by its anti-essentialist implications. The problem is, however, that in his endless appetite for indeterminacy, Fish tends to de-historicize Milton's logocentrism and do violence to his belief in an objective, knowable truth. Ironically, a clear understanding of Milton's historical otherness makes it possible to turn the tables and articulate serious doubts about the disinterestedness of pragmatism and the achievements of American liberalism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61949226437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61949226437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3138/UTQ.77.3.923

DO - 10.3138/UTQ.77.3.923

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:61949226437

VL - 77

SP - 923

EP - 939

JO - University of Toronto Quarterly

JF - University of Toronto Quarterly

SN - 0042-0247

IS - 3

ER -