Method to the Madness: Tracking and Interviewing Respondents in a Longitudinal Study of Prisoner Reentry

Chantal Fahmy, Kendra J. Clark, Meghan M. Mitchell, Scott H. Decker, David C. Pyrooz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

After nearly four decades of growth, the number of people held in U.S. prisons has begun to decline. In an era of decarceration, social scientists need to understand prisoner reentry experiences. Longitudinal studies are one strategy to accomplish this goal. Yet, the retention of a formerly incarcerated population across waves of interviews is challenging due to their transient lifestyles and limited support systems, which may be further complicated by gang involvement. This article details the longitudinal follow-up procedures used in the LoneStar Project—a multiwave study of 802 males first interviewed in prison and reinterviewed twice in the year postrelease—to build rapport, complete interviews, and minimize attrition. We then evaluate the effectiveness of our procedures on important outcomes including interview yields, appointments, and incoming calls. Results indicate that any outgoing contact with respondents via appointment reminders and other reciprocal modes of contact lead to greater project engagement and a greater likelihood of interview completion. We conclude with relevant takeaways for researchers seeking to maximize survey participation with hard-to-reach populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSociological Methods and Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

prisoner
longitudinal study
interview
correctional institution
contact
social scientist
participation
experience

Keywords

  • gang membership
  • interviewing
  • longitudinal
  • prisoner reentry
  • retention
  • survey research
  • tracking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Method to the Madness : Tracking and Interviewing Respondents in a Longitudinal Study of Prisoner Reentry. / Fahmy, Chantal; Clark, Kendra J.; Mitchell, Meghan M.; Decker, Scott H.; Pyrooz, David C.

In: Sociological Methods and Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cb25abc7af64316bfc0845aebce9362,
title = "Method to the Madness: Tracking and Interviewing Respondents in a Longitudinal Study of Prisoner Reentry",
abstract = "After nearly four decades of growth, the number of people held in U.S. prisons has begun to decline. In an era of decarceration, social scientists need to understand prisoner reentry experiences. Longitudinal studies are one strategy to accomplish this goal. Yet, the retention of a formerly incarcerated population across waves of interviews is challenging due to their transient lifestyles and limited support systems, which may be further complicated by gang involvement. This article details the longitudinal follow-up procedures used in the LoneStar Project—a multiwave study of 802 males first interviewed in prison and reinterviewed twice in the year postrelease—to build rapport, complete interviews, and minimize attrition. We then evaluate the effectiveness of our procedures on important outcomes including interview yields, appointments, and incoming calls. Results indicate that any outgoing contact with respondents via appointment reminders and other reciprocal modes of contact lead to greater project engagement and a greater likelihood of interview completion. We conclude with relevant takeaways for researchers seeking to maximize survey participation with hard-to-reach populations.",
keywords = "gang membership, interviewing, longitudinal, prisoner reentry, retention, survey research, tracking",
author = "Chantal Fahmy and Clark, {Kendra J.} and Mitchell, {Meghan M.} and Decker, {Scott H.} and Pyrooz, {David C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0049124119875962",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Sociological Methods and Research",
issn = "0049-1241",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Method to the Madness

T2 - Tracking and Interviewing Respondents in a Longitudinal Study of Prisoner Reentry

AU - Fahmy, Chantal

AU - Clark, Kendra J.

AU - Mitchell, Meghan M.

AU - Decker, Scott H.

AU - Pyrooz, David C.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - After nearly four decades of growth, the number of people held in U.S. prisons has begun to decline. In an era of decarceration, social scientists need to understand prisoner reentry experiences. Longitudinal studies are one strategy to accomplish this goal. Yet, the retention of a formerly incarcerated population across waves of interviews is challenging due to their transient lifestyles and limited support systems, which may be further complicated by gang involvement. This article details the longitudinal follow-up procedures used in the LoneStar Project—a multiwave study of 802 males first interviewed in prison and reinterviewed twice in the year postrelease—to build rapport, complete interviews, and minimize attrition. We then evaluate the effectiveness of our procedures on important outcomes including interview yields, appointments, and incoming calls. Results indicate that any outgoing contact with respondents via appointment reminders and other reciprocal modes of contact lead to greater project engagement and a greater likelihood of interview completion. We conclude with relevant takeaways for researchers seeking to maximize survey participation with hard-to-reach populations.

AB - After nearly four decades of growth, the number of people held in U.S. prisons has begun to decline. In an era of decarceration, social scientists need to understand prisoner reentry experiences. Longitudinal studies are one strategy to accomplish this goal. Yet, the retention of a formerly incarcerated population across waves of interviews is challenging due to their transient lifestyles and limited support systems, which may be further complicated by gang involvement. This article details the longitudinal follow-up procedures used in the LoneStar Project—a multiwave study of 802 males first interviewed in prison and reinterviewed twice in the year postrelease—to build rapport, complete interviews, and minimize attrition. We then evaluate the effectiveness of our procedures on important outcomes including interview yields, appointments, and incoming calls. Results indicate that any outgoing contact with respondents via appointment reminders and other reciprocal modes of contact lead to greater project engagement and a greater likelihood of interview completion. We conclude with relevant takeaways for researchers seeking to maximize survey participation with hard-to-reach populations.

KW - gang membership

KW - interviewing

KW - longitudinal

KW - prisoner reentry

KW - retention

KW - survey research

KW - tracking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074039365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074039365&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0049124119875962

DO - 10.1177/0049124119875962

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074039365

JO - Sociological Methods and Research

JF - Sociological Methods and Research

SN - 0049-1241

ER -