Maximizing federal medicaid dollars: nursing home provider tax adoption, 2000-2004

Edward Alan Miller, Lili Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since Medicaid is jointly financed by the federal and state governments, state officials have sought to offset state expenditures by maximizing federal contributions. One such strategy is to adopt a provider tax, which enables states to collect revenues from providers; those revenues are then used to pay for services rendered to Medicaid recipients, thereby leveraging federal matching dollars without concomitant increases in state expenditures. The number of states adopting a nursing home tax increased from thirteen to thirty-one between 2000 and 2004. This study seeks to identify the factors that spurred the rapid increase in nursing home provider taxes following implementation of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Results indicate that states with more powerful nursing home lobbies, lower proportions of private pay nursing home residents, worse fiscal health, weaker fiscal capacity, broader Medicaid eligibility, and nursing home supply restrictions were more likely to adopt. This implies that state officials react rationally to prevailing fiscal and programmatic circumstances when formulating policy under Medicaid and that providers seek relief, in part, from the adverse fiscal consequences of federal policy changes by promoting policy change at the state level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)899-930
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Medicaid
Nursing Homes
Health Expenditures
State Government
Federal Government
Taxes
Budgets
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Maximizing federal medicaid dollars : nursing home provider tax adoption, 2000-2004. / Miller, Edward Alan; Wang, Lili.

In: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 34, No. 6, 12.2009, p. 899-930.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{27de39d2ae7244debc20a42639eca331,
title = "Maximizing federal medicaid dollars: nursing home provider tax adoption, 2000-2004",
abstract = "Since Medicaid is jointly financed by the federal and state governments, state officials have sought to offset state expenditures by maximizing federal contributions. One such strategy is to adopt a provider tax, which enables states to collect revenues from providers; those revenues are then used to pay for services rendered to Medicaid recipients, thereby leveraging federal matching dollars without concomitant increases in state expenditures. The number of states adopting a nursing home tax increased from thirteen to thirty-one between 2000 and 2004. This study seeks to identify the factors that spurred the rapid increase in nursing home provider taxes following implementation of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Results indicate that states with more powerful nursing home lobbies, lower proportions of private pay nursing home residents, worse fiscal health, weaker fiscal capacity, broader Medicaid eligibility, and nursing home supply restrictions were more likely to adopt. This implies that state officials react rationally to prevailing fiscal and programmatic circumstances when formulating policy under Medicaid and that providers seek relief, in part, from the adverse fiscal consequences of federal policy changes by promoting policy change at the state level.",
author = "Miller, {Edward Alan} and Lili Wang",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1215/03616878-2009-031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "899--930",
journal = "Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maximizing federal medicaid dollars

T2 - nursing home provider tax adoption, 2000-2004

AU - Miller, Edward Alan

AU - Wang, Lili

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Since Medicaid is jointly financed by the federal and state governments, state officials have sought to offset state expenditures by maximizing federal contributions. One such strategy is to adopt a provider tax, which enables states to collect revenues from providers; those revenues are then used to pay for services rendered to Medicaid recipients, thereby leveraging federal matching dollars without concomitant increases in state expenditures. The number of states adopting a nursing home tax increased from thirteen to thirty-one between 2000 and 2004. This study seeks to identify the factors that spurred the rapid increase in nursing home provider taxes following implementation of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Results indicate that states with more powerful nursing home lobbies, lower proportions of private pay nursing home residents, worse fiscal health, weaker fiscal capacity, broader Medicaid eligibility, and nursing home supply restrictions were more likely to adopt. This implies that state officials react rationally to prevailing fiscal and programmatic circumstances when formulating policy under Medicaid and that providers seek relief, in part, from the adverse fiscal consequences of federal policy changes by promoting policy change at the state level.

AB - Since Medicaid is jointly financed by the federal and state governments, state officials have sought to offset state expenditures by maximizing federal contributions. One such strategy is to adopt a provider tax, which enables states to collect revenues from providers; those revenues are then used to pay for services rendered to Medicaid recipients, thereby leveraging federal matching dollars without concomitant increases in state expenditures. The number of states adopting a nursing home tax increased from thirteen to thirty-one between 2000 and 2004. This study seeks to identify the factors that spurred the rapid increase in nursing home provider taxes following implementation of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Results indicate that states with more powerful nursing home lobbies, lower proportions of private pay nursing home residents, worse fiscal health, weaker fiscal capacity, broader Medicaid eligibility, and nursing home supply restrictions were more likely to adopt. This implies that state officials react rationally to prevailing fiscal and programmatic circumstances when formulating policy under Medicaid and that providers seek relief, in part, from the adverse fiscal consequences of federal policy changes by promoting policy change at the state level.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73249147884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73249147884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/03616878-2009-031

DO - 10.1215/03616878-2009-031

M3 - Article

C2 - 20018986

AN - SCOPUS:73249147884

VL - 34

SP - 899

EP - 930

JO - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

JF - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

SN - 0361-6878

IS - 6

ER -