Mapping the Path Forward for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Review of Reviews

Craig Carter, Seth Washispack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic literature review (SLR) of 59 sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) SLRs. The key findings are that (1) we have reached a point of saturation, where we likely do not need additional SSCM SLRs that simply provide a broad overview of the content, themes, and structure of the SSCM literature (although periodic updates of existing SLRs may be warranted); however, (2) there is “white space” and opportunity to examine relationships among specific constructs and use SLRs for theory development; and (3) there is a need to improve the methodological rigor of future SSCM SLRs, as found through our introduction of a modified set of AMSTAR criteria to assess SLR quality. Finally, there is an opportunity for studies that move beyond metrics and investigation of performance from the perspective of a single organization to the broader supply chain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Business Logistics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Supply chain management
Literature review
Supply chain
Theory development

Keywords

  • meta-analysis
  • performance measurement
  • sustainable supply chain management
  • systematic literature review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Mapping the Path Forward for Sustainable Supply Chain Management : A Review of Reviews. / Carter, Craig; Washispack, Seth.

In: Journal of Business Logistics, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77077fb077fd4e43beb1e4fbb32e0807,
title = "Mapping the Path Forward for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Review of Reviews",
abstract = "This paper provides a systematic literature review (SLR) of 59 sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) SLRs. The key findings are that (1) we have reached a point of saturation, where we likely do not need additional SSCM SLRs that simply provide a broad overview of the content, themes, and structure of the SSCM literature (although periodic updates of existing SLRs may be warranted); however, (2) there is “white space” and opportunity to examine relationships among specific constructs and use SLRs for theory development; and (3) there is a need to improve the methodological rigor of future SSCM SLRs, as found through our introduction of a modified set of AMSTAR criteria to assess SLR quality. Finally, there is an opportunity for studies that move beyond metrics and investigation of performance from the perspective of a single organization to the broader supply chain.",
keywords = "meta-analysis, performance measurement, sustainable supply chain management, systematic literature review",
author = "Craig Carter and Seth Washispack",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jbl.12196",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Business Logistics",
issn = "0735-3766",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping the Path Forward for Sustainable Supply Chain Management

T2 - A Review of Reviews

AU - Carter, Craig

AU - Washispack, Seth

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This paper provides a systematic literature review (SLR) of 59 sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) SLRs. The key findings are that (1) we have reached a point of saturation, where we likely do not need additional SSCM SLRs that simply provide a broad overview of the content, themes, and structure of the SSCM literature (although periodic updates of existing SLRs may be warranted); however, (2) there is “white space” and opportunity to examine relationships among specific constructs and use SLRs for theory development; and (3) there is a need to improve the methodological rigor of future SSCM SLRs, as found through our introduction of a modified set of AMSTAR criteria to assess SLR quality. Finally, there is an opportunity for studies that move beyond metrics and investigation of performance from the perspective of a single organization to the broader supply chain.

AB - This paper provides a systematic literature review (SLR) of 59 sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) SLRs. The key findings are that (1) we have reached a point of saturation, where we likely do not need additional SSCM SLRs that simply provide a broad overview of the content, themes, and structure of the SSCM literature (although periodic updates of existing SLRs may be warranted); however, (2) there is “white space” and opportunity to examine relationships among specific constructs and use SLRs for theory development; and (3) there is a need to improve the methodological rigor of future SSCM SLRs, as found through our introduction of a modified set of AMSTAR criteria to assess SLR quality. Finally, there is an opportunity for studies that move beyond metrics and investigation of performance from the perspective of a single organization to the broader supply chain.

KW - meta-analysis

KW - performance measurement

KW - sustainable supply chain management

KW - systematic literature review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056174685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056174685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jbl.12196

DO - 10.1111/jbl.12196

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056174685

JO - Journal of Business Logistics

JF - Journal of Business Logistics

SN - 0735-3766

ER -