Madison's tightrope: The federal union and the Madisonian foundations of legitimate government

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The states' rights-nationalist debate is America's oldest constitutional debate. It is also the most puzzling, since it continues to stagger through the scholarly and political landscape even after numerous and powerful assailants - including the Civil War, the 14th Amendment, the New Deal, and the Civil Rights Era - would have seemed to have sealed its doom. Even James Madison, the father of the Constitution and perhaps the most widely respected political thinker among the founding generation, seemed puzzled about the nature of the American federal union for much of his career. This article argues that late in life, Madison elaborated a theory of "layered social compacts" that provides a compelling account of the nature of the American federal union. His account makes a significant contribution to social compact theory and also provides a potentially helpful guide for navigating today's states' rights-nationalist debates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-272
Number of pages24
JournalPolity
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 4 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

civil rights
civil war
amendment
constitution
father
career

Keywords

  • American political thought
  • federalism
  • James Madison
  • social contract
  • states' rights
  • U.S. constitution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Madison's tightrope : The federal union and the Madisonian foundations of legitimate government. / Seagrave, S. Adam.

In: Polity, Vol. 47, No. 2, 04.04.2015, p. 249-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d5b81ac11aa4529afe382be26032943,
title = "Madison's tightrope: The federal union and the Madisonian foundations of legitimate government",
abstract = "The states' rights-nationalist debate is America's oldest constitutional debate. It is also the most puzzling, since it continues to stagger through the scholarly and political landscape even after numerous and powerful assailants - including the Civil War, the 14th Amendment, the New Deal, and the Civil Rights Era - would have seemed to have sealed its doom. Even James Madison, the father of the Constitution and perhaps the most widely respected political thinker among the founding generation, seemed puzzled about the nature of the American federal union for much of his career. This article argues that late in life, Madison elaborated a theory of {"}layered social compacts{"} that provides a compelling account of the nature of the American federal union. His account makes a significant contribution to social compact theory and also provides a potentially helpful guide for navigating today's states' rights-nationalist debates.",
keywords = "American political thought, federalism, James Madison, social contract, states' rights, U.S. constitution",
author = "Seagrave, {S. Adam}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1057/pol.2015.4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "249--272",
journal = "Polity",
issn = "0032-3497",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Madison's tightrope

T2 - The federal union and the Madisonian foundations of legitimate government

AU - Seagrave, S. Adam

PY - 2015/4/4

Y1 - 2015/4/4

N2 - The states' rights-nationalist debate is America's oldest constitutional debate. It is also the most puzzling, since it continues to stagger through the scholarly and political landscape even after numerous and powerful assailants - including the Civil War, the 14th Amendment, the New Deal, and the Civil Rights Era - would have seemed to have sealed its doom. Even James Madison, the father of the Constitution and perhaps the most widely respected political thinker among the founding generation, seemed puzzled about the nature of the American federal union for much of his career. This article argues that late in life, Madison elaborated a theory of "layered social compacts" that provides a compelling account of the nature of the American federal union. His account makes a significant contribution to social compact theory and also provides a potentially helpful guide for navigating today's states' rights-nationalist debates.

AB - The states' rights-nationalist debate is America's oldest constitutional debate. It is also the most puzzling, since it continues to stagger through the scholarly and political landscape even after numerous and powerful assailants - including the Civil War, the 14th Amendment, the New Deal, and the Civil Rights Era - would have seemed to have sealed its doom. Even James Madison, the father of the Constitution and perhaps the most widely respected political thinker among the founding generation, seemed puzzled about the nature of the American federal union for much of his career. This article argues that late in life, Madison elaborated a theory of "layered social compacts" that provides a compelling account of the nature of the American federal union. His account makes a significant contribution to social compact theory and also provides a potentially helpful guide for navigating today's states' rights-nationalist debates.

KW - American political thought

KW - federalism

KW - James Madison

KW - social contract

KW - states' rights

KW - U.S. constitution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930456892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930456892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/pol.2015.4

DO - 10.1057/pol.2015.4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930456892

VL - 47

SP - 249

EP - 272

JO - Polity

JF - Polity

SN - 0032-3497

IS - 2

ER -