Longitudinal performance of a surgically implanted neuroprosthesis for lower-extremity exercise, standing, and transfers after spinal cord injury

Ronald J. Triolo, Stephanie Nogan Bailey, Michael E. Miller, Loretta M. Rohde, James S. Anderson, John A. Davis, James J. Abbas, Lisa A. Diponio, George P. Forrest, David R. Gater, Lynda J. Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the longitudinal performance of a surgically implanted neuroprosthesis for lower-extremity exercise, standing, and transfers after spinal cord injury. Design: Case series. Setting: Research or outpatient physical therapy departments of 4 academic hospitals. Participants: Subjects (N=15) with thoracic or low cervical level spinal cord injuries who had received the 8-channel neuroprosthesis for exercise and standing. Intervention: After completing rehabilitation with the device, the subjects were discharged to unrestricted home use of the system. A series of assessments were performed before discharge and at a follow-up appointment approximately 1 year later. Main Outcome Measures: Neuroprosthesis usage, maximum standing time, body weight support, knee strength, knee fatigue index, electrode stability, and component survivability. Results: Levels of maximum standing time, body weight support, knee strength, and knee fatigue index were not statistically different from discharge to follow-up (P>.05). Additionally, neuroprosthesis usage was consistent with subjects choosing to use the system on approximately half of the days during each monitoring period. Although the number of hours using the neuroprosthesis remained constant, subjects shifted their usage to more functional standing versus more maintenance exercise, suggesting that the subjects incorporated the neuroprosthesis into their lives. Safety and reliability of the system were demonstrated by electrode stability and a high component survivability rate (>90%). Conclusions: This group of 15 subjects is the largest cohort of implanted lower-extremity neuroprosthetic exercise and standing system users. The safety and efficiency data from this group, and acceptance of the neuroprosthesis as demonstrated by continued usage, indicate that future efforts toward commercialization of a similar device may be warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)896-904
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume93
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Electric stimulation
  • Exercise
  • Neural prostheses
  • Rehabilitation
  • Spinal cord injuries
  • Weight-bearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Triolo, R. J., Bailey, S. N., Miller, M. E., Rohde, L. M., Anderson, J. S., Davis, J. A., Abbas, J. J., Diponio, L. A., Forrest, G. P., Gater, D. R., & Yang, L. J. (2012). Longitudinal performance of a surgically implanted neuroprosthesis for lower-extremity exercise, standing, and transfers after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(5), 896-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.001