Life events and perceptions of life quality

Developments in a two‐factor approach

Alex J. Zautra, John W. Reich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

149 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reviews research on how a two‐factor model explains relationships between life events and perceptions of life quality. Positive life events were found to have different effects than negative life events. People rated their distress higher after experiencing negative events, but they did not always rate the quality of their daily lives lower. Positive events increased ratings of positive affect but were usually unrelated to psychological distress. While these data fit a two‐factor model of psychological well‐being best, such a model left some important exceptions to that model unexplained. To address such issues, the review focused on those occasions when the effects of events crossed affective domains. This fuller assessment promises to provide an integrative approach to understanding some of the affective and congnitive processes linking life events to quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-132
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Community Psychology
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Psychological Models
Psychology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Life events and perceptions of life quality : Developments in a two‐factor approach. / Zautra, Alex J.; Reich, John W.

In: Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1983, p. 121-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zautra, Alex J. ; Reich, John W. / Life events and perceptions of life quality : Developments in a two‐factor approach. In: Journal of Community Psychology. 1983 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 121-132.
@article{0fd80007d1464a7b8f77daa0a94c5db1,
title = "Life events and perceptions of life quality: Developments in a two‐factor approach",
abstract = "This paper reviews research on how a two‐factor model explains relationships between life events and perceptions of life quality. Positive life events were found to have different effects than negative life events. People rated their distress higher after experiencing negative events, but they did not always rate the quality of their daily lives lower. Positive events increased ratings of positive affect but were usually unrelated to psychological distress. While these data fit a two‐factor model of psychological well‐being best, such a model left some important exceptions to that model unexplained. To address such issues, the review focused on those occasions when the effects of events crossed affective domains. This fuller assessment promises to provide an integrative approach to understanding some of the affective and congnitive processes linking life events to quality of life.",
author = "Zautra, {Alex J.} and Reich, {John W.}",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1002/1520-6629(198304)11:2<121::AID-JCOP2290110206>3.0.CO;2-V",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "121--132",
journal = "Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0090-4392",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life events and perceptions of life quality

T2 - Developments in a two‐factor approach

AU - Zautra, Alex J.

AU - Reich, John W.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - This paper reviews research on how a two‐factor model explains relationships between life events and perceptions of life quality. Positive life events were found to have different effects than negative life events. People rated their distress higher after experiencing negative events, but they did not always rate the quality of their daily lives lower. Positive events increased ratings of positive affect but were usually unrelated to psychological distress. While these data fit a two‐factor model of psychological well‐being best, such a model left some important exceptions to that model unexplained. To address such issues, the review focused on those occasions when the effects of events crossed affective domains. This fuller assessment promises to provide an integrative approach to understanding some of the affective and congnitive processes linking life events to quality of life.

AB - This paper reviews research on how a two‐factor model explains relationships between life events and perceptions of life quality. Positive life events were found to have different effects than negative life events. People rated their distress higher after experiencing negative events, but they did not always rate the quality of their daily lives lower. Positive events increased ratings of positive affect but were usually unrelated to psychological distress. While these data fit a two‐factor model of psychological well‐being best, such a model left some important exceptions to that model unexplained. To address such issues, the review focused on those occasions when the effects of events crossed affective domains. This fuller assessment promises to provide an integrative approach to understanding some of the affective and congnitive processes linking life events to quality of life.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986500297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986500297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1520-6629(198304)11:2<121::AID-JCOP2290110206>3.0.CO;2-V

DO - 10.1002/1520-6629(198304)11:2<121::AID-JCOP2290110206>3.0.CO;2-V

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 121

EP - 132

JO - Journal of Community Psychology

JF - Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0090-4392

IS - 2

ER -