Lateralization of repeated filtered transients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The lateralization of a high-pass and a low-pass 40 dB SL, 0.1-msec transient was measured as a function of the number of repetitions of the transient and the repetition rate. A high-pass transient presented once required 100 /usec more interaural time for lateralization than did a low-pass transient presented once. Twelve repetitions of the high-pass transient yielded the same lateralization performance as that obtained with a low-pass transient. Repetition rate did not affect the lateralization of the high or low-pass transients, and number of repetitions did not affect the lateralization of the low-pass transients. These results were compared with results obtained with gated sinusoids presented with and without rise—decay times.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-181
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1976
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

lateral control
repetition
sine waves
Lateralization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Lateralization of repeated filtered transients. / Yost, William.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 60, No. 1, 01.01.1976, p. 178-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d4a0c4dcc32e4e68978c5cf651852996,
title = "Lateralization of repeated filtered transients",
abstract = "The lateralization of a high-pass and a low-pass 40 dB SL, 0.1-msec transient was measured as a function of the number of repetitions of the transient and the repetition rate. A high-pass transient presented once required 100 /usec more interaural time for lateralization than did a low-pass transient presented once. Twelve repetitions of the high-pass transient yielded the same lateralization performance as that obtained with a low-pass transient. Repetition rate did not affect the lateralization of the high or low-pass transients, and number of repetitions did not affect the lateralization of the low-pass transients. These results were compared with results obtained with gated sinusoids presented with and without rise—decay times.",
author = "William Yost",
year = "1976",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.381061",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "178--181",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lateralization of repeated filtered transients

AU - Yost, William

PY - 1976/1/1

Y1 - 1976/1/1

N2 - The lateralization of a high-pass and a low-pass 40 dB SL, 0.1-msec transient was measured as a function of the number of repetitions of the transient and the repetition rate. A high-pass transient presented once required 100 /usec more interaural time for lateralization than did a low-pass transient presented once. Twelve repetitions of the high-pass transient yielded the same lateralization performance as that obtained with a low-pass transient. Repetition rate did not affect the lateralization of the high or low-pass transients, and number of repetitions did not affect the lateralization of the low-pass transients. These results were compared with results obtained with gated sinusoids presented with and without rise—decay times.

AB - The lateralization of a high-pass and a low-pass 40 dB SL, 0.1-msec transient was measured as a function of the number of repetitions of the transient and the repetition rate. A high-pass transient presented once required 100 /usec more interaural time for lateralization than did a low-pass transient presented once. Twelve repetitions of the high-pass transient yielded the same lateralization performance as that obtained with a low-pass transient. Repetition rate did not affect the lateralization of the high or low-pass transients, and number of repetitions did not affect the lateralization of the low-pass transients. These results were compared with results obtained with gated sinusoids presented with and without rise—decay times.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017189194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017189194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.381061

DO - 10.1121/1.381061

M3 - Article

C2 - 956524

AN - SCOPUS:0017189194

VL - 60

SP - 178

EP - 181

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 1

ER -