Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning

Vimla Patel, Guy J. Groen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

386 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The techniques of propositionol analysis are used to examine the protocols of seven cardiologists in a task involving the diagnosis of a case of acute bacterial endocarditis and an explanation of its underlying pathophysiology. It is shown that the explanations of physicians making an accurate diagnosis can be accounted for in terms of a model consisting of pure forward reasoning through a network of causal rules, actuated by relevant propositions embedded in the stimulus text. These rules appear to derive from the physician's underlying knowledge base rather than any information in the text itself. In contrast, subjects with inacurate diagnoses tend to make use of a mixture of forward and backward reasoning, beginning with a high level hypothesis and proceeding in a top-down fashion to the propositions embedded in stimulus text, or to the generation of irrelevant rules.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-116
Number of pages26
JournalCognitive Science
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physicians
Bacterial Endocarditis
Knowledge Bases
Stimulus
Cardiologists
Causal
Proceedings
Top-down

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning. / Patel, Vimla; Groen, Guy J.

In: Cognitive Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.01.1986, p. 91-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, Vimla ; Groen, Guy J. / Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning. In: Cognitive Science. 1986 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 91-116.
@article{eddec0943cad4c52ae9774d7ff6efd63,
title = "Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning",
abstract = "The techniques of propositionol analysis are used to examine the protocols of seven cardiologists in a task involving the diagnosis of a case of acute bacterial endocarditis and an explanation of its underlying pathophysiology. It is shown that the explanations of physicians making an accurate diagnosis can be accounted for in terms of a model consisting of pure forward reasoning through a network of causal rules, actuated by relevant propositions embedded in the stimulus text. These rules appear to derive from the physician's underlying knowledge base rather than any information in the text itself. In contrast, subjects with inacurate diagnoses tend to make use of a mixture of forward and backward reasoning, beginning with a high level hypothesis and proceeding in a top-down fashion to the propositions embedded in stimulus text, or to the generation of irrelevant rules.",
author = "Vimla Patel and Groen, {Guy J.}",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0364-0213(86)80010-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "91--116",
journal = "Cognitive Science",
issn = "0364-0213",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning

AU - Patel, Vimla

AU - Groen, Guy J.

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - The techniques of propositionol analysis are used to examine the protocols of seven cardiologists in a task involving the diagnosis of a case of acute bacterial endocarditis and an explanation of its underlying pathophysiology. It is shown that the explanations of physicians making an accurate diagnosis can be accounted for in terms of a model consisting of pure forward reasoning through a network of causal rules, actuated by relevant propositions embedded in the stimulus text. These rules appear to derive from the physician's underlying knowledge base rather than any information in the text itself. In contrast, subjects with inacurate diagnoses tend to make use of a mixture of forward and backward reasoning, beginning with a high level hypothesis and proceeding in a top-down fashion to the propositions embedded in stimulus text, or to the generation of irrelevant rules.

AB - The techniques of propositionol analysis are used to examine the protocols of seven cardiologists in a task involving the diagnosis of a case of acute bacterial endocarditis and an explanation of its underlying pathophysiology. It is shown that the explanations of physicians making an accurate diagnosis can be accounted for in terms of a model consisting of pure forward reasoning through a network of causal rules, actuated by relevant propositions embedded in the stimulus text. These rules appear to derive from the physician's underlying knowledge base rather than any information in the text itself. In contrast, subjects with inacurate diagnoses tend to make use of a mixture of forward and backward reasoning, beginning with a high level hypothesis and proceeding in a top-down fashion to the propositions embedded in stimulus text, or to the generation of irrelevant rules.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002371558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002371558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0364-0213(86)80010-6

DO - 10.1016/S0364-0213(86)80010-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002371558

VL - 10

SP - 91

EP - 116

JO - Cognitive Science

JF - Cognitive Science

SN - 0364-0213

IS - 1

ER -