Issue representation in neighborhood organizations

Questing for democracy at the grassroots

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this era of government reinvention and devolution, some have expressed interest in applying that logic to the local level by including neighborhood associations among the mechanisms for delivering urban services. However, if decision-making authority were to be decentralized to a greater extent, there is the possibility that the decisions of these organizational participants might not be reflective of the group they are supposed to represent. This article seeks to examine the issue representation ability of neighborhood associations. Using a unique neighborhood-level dataset from Indianapolis, this analysis reveals how representative the organization's activities are in terms of the issues that are of most importance to residents (other participants and non-participants). In addition, the article presents and tests a model to explain differences in the levels of representation. The findings raise concents with the wisdom of such devolution as well as highlight the environmental and organizational characteristics that influence issue representation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-137
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Urban Affairs
Volume22
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

democracy
devolution
decentralization
urban service
wisdom
decision making
resident
ability
Group
decision
analysis
test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Issue representation in neighborhood organizations : Questing for democracy at the grassroots. / Swindell, David.

In: Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2000, p. 123-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{76476ccb33004775a73f6ba9947469ce,
title = "Issue representation in neighborhood organizations: Questing for democracy at the grassroots",
abstract = "In this era of government reinvention and devolution, some have expressed interest in applying that logic to the local level by including neighborhood associations among the mechanisms for delivering urban services. However, if decision-making authority were to be decentralized to a greater extent, there is the possibility that the decisions of these organizational participants might not be reflective of the group they are supposed to represent. This article seeks to examine the issue representation ability of neighborhood associations. Using a unique neighborhood-level dataset from Indianapolis, this analysis reveals how representative the organization's activities are in terms of the issues that are of most importance to residents (other participants and non-participants). In addition, the article presents and tests a model to explain differences in the levels of representation. The findings raise concents with the wisdom of such devolution as well as highlight the environmental and organizational characteristics that influence issue representation.",
author = "David Swindell",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "123--137",
journal = "Journal of Urban Affairs",
issn = "0735-2166",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issue representation in neighborhood organizations

T2 - Questing for democracy at the grassroots

AU - Swindell, David

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In this era of government reinvention and devolution, some have expressed interest in applying that logic to the local level by including neighborhood associations among the mechanisms for delivering urban services. However, if decision-making authority were to be decentralized to a greater extent, there is the possibility that the decisions of these organizational participants might not be reflective of the group they are supposed to represent. This article seeks to examine the issue representation ability of neighborhood associations. Using a unique neighborhood-level dataset from Indianapolis, this analysis reveals how representative the organization's activities are in terms of the issues that are of most importance to residents (other participants and non-participants). In addition, the article presents and tests a model to explain differences in the levels of representation. The findings raise concents with the wisdom of such devolution as well as highlight the environmental and organizational characteristics that influence issue representation.

AB - In this era of government reinvention and devolution, some have expressed interest in applying that logic to the local level by including neighborhood associations among the mechanisms for delivering urban services. However, if decision-making authority were to be decentralized to a greater extent, there is the possibility that the decisions of these organizational participants might not be reflective of the group they are supposed to represent. This article seeks to examine the issue representation ability of neighborhood associations. Using a unique neighborhood-level dataset from Indianapolis, this analysis reveals how representative the organization's activities are in terms of the issues that are of most importance to residents (other participants and non-participants). In addition, the article presents and tests a model to explain differences in the levels of representation. The findings raise concents with the wisdom of such devolution as well as highlight the environmental and organizational characteristics that influence issue representation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034423675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034423675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 123

EP - 137

JO - Journal of Urban Affairs

JF - Journal of Urban Affairs

SN - 0735-2166

IS - 2

ER -