TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating occupant safety through simulating the interaction between side curtain airbag deployment and an out-of-position occupant
AU - Potula, S. R.
AU - Solanki, Kiran
AU - Oglesby, D. L.
AU - Tschopp, M. A.
AU - Bhatia, M. A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under Award Numbers DE-FC26-02OR22910 and by the U.S. Army TACOM Life Cycle Command under Contract No. W56HZV-08-C-0236 through a subcontract with Mississippi State University, and was performed for the Simulation Based Reliability and Safety (SimBRS) research program.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - The objective of this research is to elucidate the effect of side curtain airbag deployment on occupant injuries and safety when the occupant is either in-position or out-of-position (OOP). We used side impact vehicle collision simulations with a 1996 Dodge Neon model, which was further modified to include a side curtain airbag, a seatbelt, and a 50th percentile Hybrid III dummy. The airbag used in the study was inflated using both the uniform pressure (UP) and smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) methods. In-position and OOP simulations were performed to assess and establish guidelines for airbag aggressivity thresholds and occupant position versus risk of injury. Three different OOP scenarios (OOP1, OOP2, OOP3) were initially setup following the work of Lund (2003), then modified such that the dummy's head was closer to the airbag, increasing the chance of injury caused by the airbag. The resultant head acceleration as a function of time for in-position and OOP simulations shows that both UP and SPH methods produce similar peak accelerations in cases where the airbag is fully inflated prior to impact. In all cases, the head peak accelerations and the head injury criteria for simulations with an airbag were significantly lower when compared with the no airbag case, which would typically indicate that the use of an airbag results in improved occupant protection during side impact. However, in the case of OOP2 and OOP3, the neck flexion forces actually increase significantly when compared with the no airbag case. This finding indicates that the HIC and neck flexion forces criterion are in conflict and that there may be a tradeoff in terms of occupant injury/safety with a side curtain airbag that is strongly correlated to the occupant position. Consequently, this study shows that safety devices result in a significant effect on occupant injury/safety when the occupant is in OOP conditions. Moreover, in some cases, simulation results show that the side curtain airbag may not make the occupant safer. This study requires further investigation of the vehicle-specific airbag and its interaction with an occupant in various OOP conditions.
AB - The objective of this research is to elucidate the effect of side curtain airbag deployment on occupant injuries and safety when the occupant is either in-position or out-of-position (OOP). We used side impact vehicle collision simulations with a 1996 Dodge Neon model, which was further modified to include a side curtain airbag, a seatbelt, and a 50th percentile Hybrid III dummy. The airbag used in the study was inflated using both the uniform pressure (UP) and smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) methods. In-position and OOP simulations were performed to assess and establish guidelines for airbag aggressivity thresholds and occupant position versus risk of injury. Three different OOP scenarios (OOP1, OOP2, OOP3) were initially setup following the work of Lund (2003), then modified such that the dummy's head was closer to the airbag, increasing the chance of injury caused by the airbag. The resultant head acceleration as a function of time for in-position and OOP simulations shows that both UP and SPH methods produce similar peak accelerations in cases where the airbag is fully inflated prior to impact. In all cases, the head peak accelerations and the head injury criteria for simulations with an airbag were significantly lower when compared with the no airbag case, which would typically indicate that the use of an airbag results in improved occupant protection during side impact. However, in the case of OOP2 and OOP3, the neck flexion forces actually increase significantly when compared with the no airbag case. This finding indicates that the HIC and neck flexion forces criterion are in conflict and that there may be a tradeoff in terms of occupant injury/safety with a side curtain airbag that is strongly correlated to the occupant position. Consequently, this study shows that safety devices result in a significant effect on occupant injury/safety when the occupant is in OOP conditions. Moreover, in some cases, simulation results show that the side curtain airbag may not make the occupant safer. This study requires further investigation of the vehicle-specific airbag and its interaction with an occupant in various OOP conditions.
KW - Crashworthiness
KW - Finite element analysis
KW - Occupant safety and injury
KW - Out-of-position
KW - Side curtain airbag
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867070651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867070651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.007
DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 23036418
AN - SCOPUS:84867070651
SN - 0001-4575
VL - 49
SP - 392
EP - 403
JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention
JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention
ER -