Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment: A Primer for Social Workers

Jill Messing, Jonel Thaller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social workers are likely to encounter intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors and/or perpetrators within their practice due to the prevalence of this social issue and the negative health and mental health consequences resulting from it. IPV risk assessments can be utilised by social workers in multiple service settings. A recent meta-analysis provided information on the IPV risk assessment instruments with the greatest predictive accuracy, but social workers need to know the most appropriate IPV risk assessment tools for use in their particular practice settings. Therefore, this paper provides social workers with summary information on the four risk assessment instruments that have the highest predictive accuracy-the Danger Assessment, the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment, the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment, and the Domestic Violence Screening Inventory. For social workers unable to use validated risk assessments, a summary of the risk factors is provided with a focus on opportunities for change within violent relationships. Finally, recommendations for which IPV risk assessment to use in various social work practice settings are outlined. The use of IPV risk assessment should be situated within an evidence-based practice framework, taking into account the best evidence of risk for future harm, clinical expertise and client self-determination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1804-1820
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

risk assessment
social worker
violence
assault
Social Workers
Intimate Partner Violence
Personal Autonomy
Domestic Violence
health consequences
Evidence-Based Practice
Ontario
social issue
self-determination
Social Work
domestic violence
evidence
Survivors
Meta-Analysis
Mental Health
social work

Keywords

  • Domestic violence
  • evidence-based practice
  • intimate partner violence
  • risk
  • risk assessment
  • risk factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment : A Primer for Social Workers. / Messing, Jill; Thaller, Jonel.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 45, No. 6, 01.09.2015, p. 1804-1820.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01868a7a76284a2f8d823009a8bdeb45,
title = "Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment: A Primer for Social Workers",
abstract = "Social workers are likely to encounter intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors and/or perpetrators within their practice due to the prevalence of this social issue and the negative health and mental health consequences resulting from it. IPV risk assessments can be utilised by social workers in multiple service settings. A recent meta-analysis provided information on the IPV risk assessment instruments with the greatest predictive accuracy, but social workers need to know the most appropriate IPV risk assessment tools for use in their particular practice settings. Therefore, this paper provides social workers with summary information on the four risk assessment instruments that have the highest predictive accuracy-the Danger Assessment, the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment, the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment, and the Domestic Violence Screening Inventory. For social workers unable to use validated risk assessments, a summary of the risk factors is provided with a focus on opportunities for change within violent relationships. Finally, recommendations for which IPV risk assessment to use in various social work practice settings are outlined. The use of IPV risk assessment should be situated within an evidence-based practice framework, taking into account the best evidence of risk for future harm, clinical expertise and client self-determination.",
keywords = "Domestic violence, evidence-based practice, intimate partner violence, risk, risk assessment, risk factors",
author = "Jill Messing and Jonel Thaller",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcu012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "1804--1820",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment

T2 - A Primer for Social Workers

AU - Messing, Jill

AU - Thaller, Jonel

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Social workers are likely to encounter intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors and/or perpetrators within their practice due to the prevalence of this social issue and the negative health and mental health consequences resulting from it. IPV risk assessments can be utilised by social workers in multiple service settings. A recent meta-analysis provided information on the IPV risk assessment instruments with the greatest predictive accuracy, but social workers need to know the most appropriate IPV risk assessment tools for use in their particular practice settings. Therefore, this paper provides social workers with summary information on the four risk assessment instruments that have the highest predictive accuracy-the Danger Assessment, the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment, the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment, and the Domestic Violence Screening Inventory. For social workers unable to use validated risk assessments, a summary of the risk factors is provided with a focus on opportunities for change within violent relationships. Finally, recommendations for which IPV risk assessment to use in various social work practice settings are outlined. The use of IPV risk assessment should be situated within an evidence-based practice framework, taking into account the best evidence of risk for future harm, clinical expertise and client self-determination.

AB - Social workers are likely to encounter intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors and/or perpetrators within their practice due to the prevalence of this social issue and the negative health and mental health consequences resulting from it. IPV risk assessments can be utilised by social workers in multiple service settings. A recent meta-analysis provided information on the IPV risk assessment instruments with the greatest predictive accuracy, but social workers need to know the most appropriate IPV risk assessment tools for use in their particular practice settings. Therefore, this paper provides social workers with summary information on the four risk assessment instruments that have the highest predictive accuracy-the Danger Assessment, the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment, the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment, and the Domestic Violence Screening Inventory. For social workers unable to use validated risk assessments, a summary of the risk factors is provided with a focus on opportunities for change within violent relationships. Finally, recommendations for which IPV risk assessment to use in various social work practice settings are outlined. The use of IPV risk assessment should be situated within an evidence-based practice framework, taking into account the best evidence of risk for future harm, clinical expertise and client self-determination.

KW - Domestic violence

KW - evidence-based practice

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - risk

KW - risk assessment

KW - risk factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942313708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942313708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcu012

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcu012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942313708

VL - 45

SP - 1804

EP - 1820

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 6

ER -